【摘要】：法律原則的理論研究在西方國(guó)家早已有了林林總總的流派，而在我國(guó)大陸法理學(xué)教科書(shū)中一般僅將其與法律概念、法律規(guī)則等等一并作為法律的基本要素之一，，但是21世紀(jì)以來(lái)由于我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐的吁求，法律原則理論得到了較大的發(fā)展。例如2001年發(fā)生在四川的那起聞名全國(guó)的瀘州遺贈(zèng)案，法院就已經(jīng)面臨著“法律原則如何適用”的難題。而由此引發(fā)的糾結(jié)在法律規(guī)則和社會(huì)價(jià)值之間的法律原則，承載了太多的分歧與爭(zhēng)論。這不僅因?yàn)槠涫橇⒎ㄖ行哪Ｊ胶退痉ㄖ行哪Ｊ礁?jìng)爭(zhēng)的對(duì)象，而且也是原則之治與規(guī)則之治爭(zhēng)論的中心。而縱觀我國(guó)法學(xué)界對(duì)于法律原則問(wèn)題的研究基本上都是圍繞法律原則的適用問(wèn)題而展開(kāi)，都力求對(duì)該問(wèn)題進(jìn)行作出更加合理的、更具有學(xué)理性的解釋;但是其中涉及的甚多法律問(wèn)題至今終無(wú)定論，至少?zèng)]有形成一個(gè)相對(duì)統(tǒng)一、全面、完整的論說(shuō)。故本文亦將以法律原則適用問(wèn)題研究為中心，全面了解法律原則適用理論研究的現(xiàn)狀，在充分把握法律原則與法律規(guī)則的關(guān)系、法律原則的適用條件、法律原則在民法與刑法中適用的差異的基礎(chǔ)上，進(jìn)行深入探析規(guī)則約束說(shuō)的內(nèi)涵和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義，并運(yùn)用哲學(xué)理論通過(guò)法律邏輯分析的方法，從實(shí)質(zhì)理性與形式理性在法學(xué)領(lǐng)域里的實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀上和司法權(quán)來(lái)源的角度上進(jìn)行充分論證規(guī)則約束說(shuō)的理論基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:The theoretical study of legal principles has long existed in western countries, but in the textbooks of jurisprudence in mainland China, it is generally regarded as one of the basic elements of law together with legal concepts, legal rules and so on. However, since the 21st century, due to the appeal of our judicial practice, the theory of legal principles has been greatly developed. For example, in the famous Luzhou bequest case in Sichuan Province in 2001, the court already faced the problem of "how to apply the legal principles". Therefore, the legal principles between legal rules and social values bear too many differences and controversies. This is not only the object of competition between the legislative-centered model and the judicial-centered model, but also the center of the dispute between the rule-governing and the rule-based governance. On the whole, the research on the legal principle in the legal circle of our country is based on the application of the legal principle, and all strive to make a more reasonable and more rational explanation of the problem. However, many of the legal issues involved are still inconclusive, at least not forming a relatively unified, comprehensive and complete theory. Therefore, this paper will also take the study of the application of legal principles as the center, fully understand the current situation of the theoretical research on the application of legal principles, fully grasp the relationship between legal principles and legal rules, and the applicable conditions of legal principles. On the basis of the difference between civil law and criminal law, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the connotation and practical significance of the rule restraint theory, and applies the philosophical theory through the method of legal logic analysis. This paper fully demonstrates the theoretical basis of the rule restraint theory from the point of view of the practice status of the substantive rationality and the formal reason in the field of law and the source of judicial power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪全勝;;法律適用原則競(jìng)合時(shí)的司法選擇[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

2 陳實(shí);論法官在困難案件中的角色[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

3 吳春雷;司法裁判中的法律原則適用質(zhì)疑[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年02期

4 龐凌;法律原則的識(shí)別和適用[J];法學(xué);2004年10期

5 梁迎修;;法律原則的適用——基于方法論視角的分析[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

6 李可;原則和規(guī)則的若干問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年05期

7 董雯婧;;方法論視野下法律原則的司法適用[J];民辦教育研究;2009年08期

8 李傳先;;法律原則的適用方式及方法[J];前沿;2009年01期

9 舒國(guó)瀅;法律原則適用中的難題何在[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

10 謝暉;法律原則的效力和適用條件[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

本文編號(hào)：2457199