法律程式化語言研究
[Abstract]:Legal programming language is an important part of legal language, which is widely used in legislative language, judicial language and law enforcement language. Legal stylized language plays a very important role in the practice of legal legislation and judicial practice. Through the study of legal stylized language, we can strengthen the understanding of legal stylized language among legal workers. And cause more legal workers to participate in the study of legal stylized language, and promote legal practitioners to use legal stylized language consciously. Legal stylized language is a prefabricated or semi-prefabricated mode of expression formed by language in the application of legal activities, such as normative, rigorous, single vocabulary, sentence structure and so on. According to the application of legal programming language in historical documents and in modern legal activities, the formation of legal programming language can be summarized into five models, which are evolutionary models, respectively. Case model, transition pattern, logical model and universal model. The application of legal stylized language in legal activities has important pragmatic value and practical function, which is manifested in the simplicity, rhythmicity, standardization and prompt function of legal context, as well as the function of maintaining legal majesty. Legal stylized language also shows the characteristics of adaptability and generation in its application. The legal programming language shows two aspects: explicit and prescriptive in the expression of the rights and the prescribed obligations in the legislative discourse. In the distribution statistics of the application of explicit programming language and prescriptive programming language in 10 laws, it is found that the use frequency of prescriptive program is higher than that of explicit programming language. The obligatory programming language is used more frequently than the rights-conferred programming language. Legal programming language uses similar or similar expressions, whether in the expression of rights and obligations or in explicit and prescriptive expressions. The analysis of these similar or similar procedural languages can promote the legislative workers to choose the legal programming language accurately, and it can also promote the judicial workers to understand and differentiate the legal programming language correctly.
【作者單位】: 江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)法律語言學(xué)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】:D90-055
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 張新紅;漢語立法語篇的言語行為分析[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2000年03期
2 陳炯;論立法語言功能域[J];畢節(jié)師范高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期
3 陳炯;論立法語言的風(fēng)格特征[J];畢節(jié)師范高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
4 劉仕明;第二語言習(xí)得中的程式語研究[J];天津外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期
5 陳炯;二十多年來中國法律語言研究評(píng)述[J];畢節(jié)師范高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 冀婷婷;法律語言模糊性的語義學(xué)和語用學(xué)視角研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年
2 張忠梅;程式化語言的順應(yīng)論探究[D];西南大學(xué);2006年
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬雯;論英語立法語言模糊詞語的運(yùn)用及不可消除性[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期
2 王剛;李巖;;關(guān)于國際法學(xué)科開設(shè)英漢雙語教學(xué)的思考[J];安康師專學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期
3 郭自力,李榮;刑事立法語言的立場(chǎng)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期
4 陳炯;論幾種表達(dá)法律規(guī)范的特殊句式[J];畢節(jié)師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期
5 陳炯;論立法語言的風(fēng)格特征[J];畢節(jié)師范高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
6 譚s,
本文編號(hào):2442983
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2442983.html