【摘要】：誣告罪隨著國家的產(chǎn)生而產(chǎn)生,它是一種利用國家權(quán)力宣泄私怨的犯罪,所以誣告罪的懲治得到了歷朝歷代統(tǒng)治者們的重視。它不僅侵犯了他人的人身權(quán)利,同時也對統(tǒng)治者所確立的司法秩序帶來了極大的破壞,因此,誣告罪懲治的律文在各朝代中都處于重要的地位。早在西周時期,就有了懲罰誣告犯罪的案件記載,秦代時就確立了誣告反坐的法律原則。此后,這項法律原則一直被歷代承襲,在相當(dāng)長的一段時間內(nèi)都是解決誣告犯罪的唯一的強制性規(guī)定,并且對控制誣告犯罪發(fā)揮了莫大的作用。唐律總結(jié)前代的立法、司法的實踐和經(jīng)驗,以"一準(zhǔn)于禮、明法慎刑"為立法的指導(dǎo)思想,在提升立法技術(shù)、闡述法律原理等方面都取得了極高的成就,成為中國傳統(tǒng)律學(xué)的典范和代表。表現(xiàn)在誣告罪懲治中,則是建立了一整套完整而又科學(xué)嚴密的誣告罪律文體系,可操作性強,為司法官吏在司法實踐中提供了行之有效的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。目前,學(xué)術(shù)界尚未有對唐律誣告罪的專門論述,對唐律誣告罪的研究還顯得不足。本文基于此而論。全文共分為四個部分:第一部分首先探索誣告字義字源,并對唐以前誣告罪的懲治分為先秦、秦漢、魏晉南北朝三個時期進行考察。第二部分參照現(xiàn)代刑法犯罪四要件學(xué)說,對誣告罪展開論述,分析唐律中對誣告罪的規(guī)定。第三個部分考察唐代誣告罪懲治的司法實踐,由于武周時期統(tǒng)治者特殊的社會環(huán)境和政策,故分為武周時期和其他時期加以論述。第四部分嘗試對唐律誣告罪做出評析。
[Abstract]:The crime of falsehood comes into being with the emergence of the country, it is a crime of using state power to vent private grievances, so the punishment of falsehood crime has been attached great importance to by the rulers of successive dynasties. It not only infringed upon the personal rights of others, but also caused great damage to the judicial order established by the rulers. Therefore, the law of falsehood and punishment was in an important position in every dynasty. As early as the Western Zhou Dynasty, there were cases of punishment for false accusation, Qin Dynasty established the legal principle of false accusation. Since then, this legal principle has been inherited by successive dynasties, in a long period of time is the only mandatory provision to solve the crime of false accusation, and has played a great role in controlling the crime of false accusation. Tang law summarized the legislation of the previous generation, judicial practice and experience, taking the guiding ideology of the legislation, such as "the first rule of ceremony, Ming law careful punishment" as the guiding ideology, has made great achievements in improving the legislative technology and expounding the legal principle, and so on. To become the model and representative of Chinese traditional law. In the punishment of falsehood accusation, a complete set of scientific and strict legal system of falsehood accusation is established, which has strong operability and provides an effective standard for judicial officials in judicial practice. At present, there is no special discussion on the crime of falsehood in the academia, and the research on the crime of falsehood of the law of Tang Dynasty is still insufficient. This paper is based on this. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part explores the source of false accusation, and the punishment of the crime of falsehood before Tang Dynasty is divided into three periods: Pre-Qin, Qin and Han, Wei, Jin and Southern and Northern dynasties. The second part, referring to the four elements theory of modern criminal law, discusses the crime of falsehood and analyzes the provisions of the law of Tang Dynasty on the crime of falsehood. The third part investigates the judicial practice of the punishment of false accusation in Tang Dynasty. Because of the special social environment and policy of rulers in Wu-Zhou period, it is divided into Wu-Zhou period and other periods. The fourth part tries to comment on the crime of falsehood of Tang Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D929

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 徐敏;;建國以來中國女性就業(yè)的歷史沿革[J];廣西黨史;2006年11期

2 陳宇;唐亞玲;;鄉(xiāng)村公共產(chǎn)品供給主體論[J];法制與社會;2006年20期

3 謝忠強;李云;;試論我國古代慈善事業(yè)的歷史沿革[J];延邊大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

4 蔣雯雯;;我國行政投訴制度的歷史沿革及現(xiàn)狀概述[J];新西部(理論版);2012年07期

5 胡錦昊;李仲偉;;淺論我軍歷史使命沿革發(fā)展的規(guī)律和要求[J];中共貴州省委黨校學(xué)報;2009年03期

6 溫云峰;;國內(nèi)外非政府組織歷史沿革綜述[J];廣東石油化工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年02期

7 王躍飛;中國民主黨派的歷史沿革[J];社會科學(xué)家;2005年05期

8 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 秦雪;刑法視野下的勞動權(quán)保護研究[D];河南大學(xué);2015年

2 楊欽云;唐代誣告罪研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：2412624