天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 法理論文 >

邊沁功利主義立法觀探析

發(fā)布時間:2019-01-14 09:19
【摘要】:英國工業(yè)革命的發(fā)展,資本主義法律制度的相繼建立,使得邊沁的功利主義立法觀應運而生。這種理論主張,正是人們對功利的需要才導致了立法以及法律的產(chǎn)生。據(jù)此,邊沁提出了立法的目的就是功利,即實現(xiàn)"最大多數(shù)人的最大幸福"。邊沁側(cè)重從立法的角度考察法的功用,他認為立法可以增進人類的幸福,自然法不能為人們解決實際的問題。目前,就我國正在進行的法治建設(shè)而言,這種講求實際功用的立法觀,的確具有可供參考和借鑒的價值。比如,注重個人利益和社會利益的結(jié)合。我國在注重經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的同時,不僅要關(guān)注個人利益是否得到滿足,還要注重個人利益和社會利益的有效結(jié)合。否則,兩者之間無法平衡將導致利益無法發(fā)生實效。雖然邊沁的這種理論存在固有的缺陷,但是鑒于我國迫切需要完善的立法理論引導法治建設(shè),以及國內(nèi)對功利主義立法理論不夠重視的現(xiàn)狀,因此,筆者認為深入分析這種理論本身的價值,對我國的法治建設(shè)具有很大的借鑒意義,這也正是本文所要解決的問題。本文將通過對邊沁的功利主義立法觀的深入研究,試圖引起人們對功利主義的足夠重視,探索這種理論對我國法治國家和法治社會的借鑒意義。本文主要分為四個部分:第一部分,首先界定邊沁功利主義立法觀的真正內(nèi)涵,并通過闡述其發(fā)展脈絡(luò),架構(gòu)邊沁思想發(fā)展的時代背景,以求進一步深入探討其特征和內(nèi)容。第二部分,闡明邊沁功利主義立法觀的特征,并通過分析其特征,陳述利弊,使人們正確看待功利主義,引起人們對功利主義的足夠重視。第三部分,分析功利主義的構(gòu)成,對功利主義的立法觀進行深入的研究與剖析。第四部分,通過前面三個部分的闡述,總結(jié)功利主義立法觀對我國法治建設(shè)的啟示,為我國完善立法理論提供參考。
[Abstract]:With the development of British industrial revolution and the establishment of capitalist legal system, Bentham's utilitarian legislation came into being. This theory claims that it is the need for utilitarianism that leads to the production of legislation and law. On this basis, Bentham put forward the purpose of legislation is utilitarian, that is, to realize "the greatest happiness of most people". Bentham emphasizes the function of law from the angle of legislation. He thinks that legislation can promote the happiness of human beings, and natural law can not solve the practical problems for people. At present, as far as the construction of the rule of law is concerned, this kind of legislation view, which emphasizes the actual function, has the value for reference and reference. For example, pay attention to the combination of personal interests and social interests. While paying attention to economic development, our country should pay attention not only to whether personal interests are satisfied, but also to the effective combination of personal interests and social interests. Otherwise, the lack of balance between the two will result in impractical benefits. Although Bentham's theory has its inherent defects, in view of the urgent need for perfect legislative theory to guide the construction of the rule of law in our country and the current situation that the utilitarian legislative theory is not paid enough attention to in our country, The author thinks that the deep analysis of the value of this theory is of great significance to the construction of the rule of law in our country, which is exactly the problem to be solved in this paper. In this paper, through the in-depth study of Bentham's utilitarian legislative view, we try to arouse people's attention to utilitarianism and explore the significance of this theory to our country and society under the rule of law. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part defines the real connotation of Bentham's utilitarian legislative view, and through the elaboration of its development context, frame the background of Bentham's thought development, in order to further explore its characteristics and content. The second part clarifies the characteristics of Bentham's utilitarianism legislative view, and through analyzing its characteristics, states its advantages and disadvantages, makes people treat utilitarianism correctly, and causes people to pay enough attention to utilitarianism. In the third part, the composition of utilitarianism is analyzed, and the legislative view of utilitarianism is deeply studied and analyzed. The fourth part, through the first three parts of the elaboration, summarizes the utilitarianism legislative view to our country rule of law construction enlightenment, provides the reference for our country consummation legislation theory.
【學位授予單位】:浙江大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D909.1;D920.0

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 廖雯柵;;社會福利立法的模式選擇及其難點突破[J];江西社會科學;2016年12期

2 田杜國;;地方立法中的靈魂——“地方特色”[J];山西省政法管理干部學院學報;2011年03期

3 翟小波;;自由主義民主之反思[J];中外法學;2009年01期

4 劉繼同;中國社會工作發(fā)展狀況與社會福利政策處境[J];首都師范大學學報(社會科學版);2005年01期

5 孫笑俠;法律家的技能與倫理[J];法學研究;2001年04期

,

本文編號:2408556

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2408556.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶5b30b***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com