全國首例QQ相約自殺民事賠償糾紛案評(píng)析
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-12-26 12:14
【摘要】:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的快速發(fā)展,給廣大網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶帶來極大的便利,同時(shí)也帶來諸多新的法律問題,對(duì)我國現(xiàn)有的法律制度提出了嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的侵權(quán)責(zé)任問題便是其中之一。由于我國目前法律并沒有對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任作出明確的規(guī)定,法官只能從傳統(tǒng)法律的基本原理和精神出發(fā)作出判決,但是,僅憑傳統(tǒng)法律的基本原理和精神來審判案件是遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠的,這種方式會(huì)使法院的判決缺乏一致性,導(dǎo)致相同的案件在不同的法院得到不同的判決結(jié)果;會(huì)使網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者不能對(duì)其從業(yè)的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)作出正確的預(yù)期;而且也不利于網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶及相關(guān)權(quán)利人合法權(quán)益的保護(hù)。 網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者為信息的傳播提供了載體與平臺(tái),是互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)生、存在和發(fā)展的必要參與者?梢哉f,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的健康發(fā)展是互聯(lián)網(wǎng)健康發(fā)展的重要保證。因此,從法律上對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者服務(wù)行為的性質(zhì)和應(yīng)負(fù)擔(dān)的義務(wù)作出界定,確定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則、構(gòu)成要件,明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者在侵權(quán)案件中應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任,這直接關(guān)系到網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的利益,關(guān)系到權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)益,關(guān)系到網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶的正當(dāng)權(quán)益,關(guān)系到整個(gè)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的健康發(fā)展。 我國的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展起步較晚,一些發(fā)達(dá)國家,如美國、德國,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展早,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上發(fā)生的侵權(quán)案件多,對(duì)如何規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任有較深入的研究。雖然我國和這些國家在法律體系和法律制度方面存在著差異,但互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展的基本共性決定了我們?nèi)钥山梃b其立法的精神及在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展過程中的有益經(jīng)驗(yàn),再結(jié)合我國實(shí)際國情制定和完善我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任法律制度,從而促進(jìn)我國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the Internet brings great convenience to the vast number of network users, but also brings many new legal problems, which poses a severe challenge to the existing legal system of our country. The tort liability of network service provider is one of them. Because the current law of our country does not make clear stipulation to the tort liability of network service provider, the judge can only make the judgment from the basic principle and spirit of the traditional law, but, It is far from enough to try a case on the basis of the basic principle and spirit of traditional law. This way will make the judgment of the court lack of consistency, leading to the same case in different courts to obtain different results of judgment; It will make the network service provider unable to make the correct expectation on the legal risk of its employment, and it will also be unfavorable to the protection of the legal rights and interests of the network users and the relevant right holders. Network service providers provide carriers and platforms for the dissemination of information and are essential participants in the generation, existence and development of the Internet. It can be said that the healthy development of network service providers is an important guarantee of the healthy development of the Internet. Therefore, from the legal definition of the nature of the network service provider service behavior and the obligations to bear, determine the network service provider tort liability principle, constitutive elements, It is clear that the responsibility of network service provider in tort cases is directly related to the interests of network service providers, the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders, and the legitimate rights and interests of network users. Related to the healthy development of the entire Internet. The development of Internet in China started late, some developed countries, such as the United States, Germany, the Internet developed early, there are many cases of infringement on the Internet, how to regulate the tort liability of network service providers has a more in-depth study. Although there are differences between China and these countries in terms of legal systems and legal systems, the basic commonality of the development of the Internet determines that we can still learn from the spirit of their legislation and useful experience in the development of the Internet. In order to promote the healthy development of the Internet in China, the author formulates and consummates the legal system of tort liability of the network service provider in our country according to the actual situation of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D923;D920.5
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the Internet brings great convenience to the vast number of network users, but also brings many new legal problems, which poses a severe challenge to the existing legal system of our country. The tort liability of network service provider is one of them. Because the current law of our country does not make clear stipulation to the tort liability of network service provider, the judge can only make the judgment from the basic principle and spirit of the traditional law, but, It is far from enough to try a case on the basis of the basic principle and spirit of traditional law. This way will make the judgment of the court lack of consistency, leading to the same case in different courts to obtain different results of judgment; It will make the network service provider unable to make the correct expectation on the legal risk of its employment, and it will also be unfavorable to the protection of the legal rights and interests of the network users and the relevant right holders. Network service providers provide carriers and platforms for the dissemination of information and are essential participants in the generation, existence and development of the Internet. It can be said that the healthy development of network service providers is an important guarantee of the healthy development of the Internet. Therefore, from the legal definition of the nature of the network service provider service behavior and the obligations to bear, determine the network service provider tort liability principle, constitutive elements, It is clear that the responsibility of network service provider in tort cases is directly related to the interests of network service providers, the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders, and the legitimate rights and interests of network users. Related to the healthy development of the entire Internet. The development of Internet in China started late, some developed countries, such as the United States, Germany, the Internet developed early, there are many cases of infringement on the Internet, how to regulate the tort liability of network service providers has a more in-depth study. Although there are differences between China and these countries in terms of legal systems and legal systems, the basic commonality of the development of the Internet determines that we can still learn from the spirit of their legislation and useful experience in the development of the Internet. In order to promote the healthy development of the Internet in China, the author formulates and consummates the legal system of tort liability of the network service provider in our country according to the actual situation of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D923;D920.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 李開國;黃忠;;我國侵權(quán)行為立法發(fā)展評(píng)述[J];法治研究;2008年10期
2 王永杰;;QQ群聊是不是公共領(lǐng)域[J];考試周刊;2007年24期
3 ,
本文編號(hào):2392114
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2392114.html