【摘要】：批評性話語分析是由福勒Fowler等語言學(xué)家在20世紀(jì)70年代提出的,它是一種旨在把語言和語言使用與其意識(shí)形態(tài)意義聯(lián)系起來的分析方法,其目的是通過對大眾語篇的分析來揭示意識(shí)形態(tài)對語篇形成的影響和語篇對意識(shí)形態(tài)的反作用。批評性話語分析作為一種把語言的社會(huì)性作為分析目的的話語分析,其方法論主要是建立在系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)上。語言的本質(zhì)與我們對它的需求和它所應(yīng)完成的功能有著密切聯(lián)系,因此,韓禮德的系統(tǒng)功能語法可以作為批評性話語分析的工具。 本文試圖通過對美劇《波士頓法律》中律師言語進(jìn)行分析,探討法律語篇中語言與意識(shí)形態(tài)之間的隱藏關(guān)系以及展示語篇生產(chǎn)者如何通過語言的選擇傳播他們的意志和觀點(diǎn)。本文從宏觀的角度用費(fèi)爾克勞夫的三維分析模式來進(jìn)行語料分析。這一分析模式包括三步驟：描述、闡釋和說明。首先作者從微觀上用韓禮德的系統(tǒng)功能語法為工具,主要從概念功能對律師的語言特征進(jìn)行描述。然后聯(lián)系語篇與語篇生產(chǎn)者之間的關(guān)系闡釋語篇的生成過程。最后作者從社會(huì)的角度聯(lián)系相關(guān)的社會(huì)歷史語境來說明語篇與社會(huì)因素的相互關(guān)系,主要分析《波士頓法律》中律師的社會(huì)歷史背景以及語篇中所體現(xiàn)的權(quán)利意識(shí)形態(tài)關(guān)系。 通過以上的分析可以發(fā)現(xiàn)語篇中的語言特征如分類、及物性、轉(zhuǎn)換的選擇等都受到語言的功能和語篇生產(chǎn)者的意識(shí)形態(tài)的支配。語篇作為一種強(qiáng)有力的工具能幫助律師實(shí)現(xiàn)他們的目的。因此,我們在分析語篇時(shí),不僅要分析語言的本身,同時(shí)也要考慮到一些社會(huì)因素如意識(shí)形態(tài)、語言與權(quán)力之間的關(guān)系等。批評性話語分析方法能夠揭示隱藏在律師言語中的意識(shí)形態(tài),從而幫助觀眾自覺地感知隱藏在律師言語中的意識(shí)形態(tài)。
[Abstract]:Critical discourse analysis (CDA) was proposed by linguists such as Fowler in the 1970s. It is an analytical method designed to link language and language use with its ideological meaning. Its purpose is to reveal the influence of ideology on the formation of discourse and the reaction of discourse to ideology through the analysis of popular discourse. As a kind of discourse analysis which regards the sociality of language as the purpose of analysis, the methodology of critical discourse analysis is mainly based on systemic functional linguistics. The nature of language is closely related to our need for it and the functions it should perform. Therefore, Halliday's systemic functional grammar can be used as a tool for critical discourse analysis. This paper attempts to explore the hidden relationship between language and ideology in legal discourse through the analysis of lawyers' speech in Boston Law, and to demonstrate how discourse producers communicate their will and views through language choice. In this paper, three-dimensional analysis model of Faircroft is used to carry out corpus analysis from a macro point of view. This analytical model consists of three steps: description, interpretation and explanation. Firstly, using Halliday's systemic functional grammar as a tool, the author mainly describes the language features of lawyers from conceptual functions. Then the relationship between the text and the producer explains the formation of the text. Finally, the author tries to explain the relationship between discourse and social factors from the perspective of social and historical context, and mainly analyzes the social and historical background of lawyers in Boston Law and the relationship between rights and ideologies embodied in the discourse. Through the above analysis, we can find that the linguistic features in the discourse, such as classification, transitivity and the choice of transformation, are all controlled by the functions of language and the ideology of the producers of the discourse. Discourse as a powerful tool can help lawyers achieve their goals. Therefore, when we analyze discourse, we should not only analyze the language itself, but also take into account some social factors such as ideology, the relationship between language and power, and so on. Critical discourse analysis (CDA) can reveal the ideology hidden in the lawyer's speech and help the audience consciously perceive the ideology hidden in the lawyer's speech.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H313;D90-055

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟登迎;意識(shí)形態(tài)國家機(jī)器[J];外國文學(xué);2004年01期

2 李戰(zhàn)子;多模式話語的社會(huì)符號(hào)學(xué)分析[J];外語研究;2003年05期

3 戴煒華,陳宇昀;批評語篇分析的理論和方法[J];外語研究;2004年04期

4 施光;辛斌;;試析美國憲法中的情態(tài)系統(tǒng)[J];外語學(xué)刊;2008年02期

5 管振彬;淺談?wù)Z法隱喻及其實(shí)際意義[J];湖北教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

6 項(xiàng)蘊(yùn)華;簡述Fairclough的語篇分析觀[J];山東外語教學(xué);2004年05期

7 李素玲;批評性語篇分析:發(fā)展概況及應(yīng)用前景[J];山東外語教學(xué);2004年05期

8 朱士昌;情態(tài)值——社會(huì)人際關(guān)系的鏡子[J];上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期

9 辛斌;批評語言學(xué)與英語新聞?wù)Z篇的批評性分析[J];外語教學(xué);2000年04期

10 陳中竺;批評語言學(xué)述評[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1995年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 曾妹云;英語新聞?wù)Z篇的及物性批評分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2389499