【摘要】：土地美學(xué)的法律規(guī)范兼具美學(xué)和法學(xué)雙重屬性,在城市中,集中體現(xiàn)為利用法律規(guī)范的形式對土地利用進行規(guī)劃和限制以符合城市景觀美學(xué)。美國土地使用規(guī)劃中的美學(xué)規(guī)范屬于警察權(quán)的范疇,經(jīng)歷了司法拒絕、附帶性承認和單獨承認三個階段,并在歷史街區(qū)、地標等的美學(xué)保護上發(fā)揮了重要作用。新中國成立以來,我國城市土地區(qū)劃法律體系中缺乏必要的"美學(xué)條款",通過借鑒美國的經(jīng)驗,我國應(yīng)當在構(gòu)建城市土地區(qū)劃的美學(xué)規(guī)范時用原則性規(guī)范確立美學(xué)的獨立保護價值,在充分論證美學(xué)與其他公共利益聯(lián)系性的基礎(chǔ)上制定具體可操作的美學(xué)條款;建立公民參與制度并引入"環(huán)境權(quán)";對特殊區(qū)域進行重點"美學(xué)保護";構(gòu)建"區(qū)劃獎勵與懲罰"制度。
[Abstract]:The legal norms of land aesthetics have the dual attributes of aesthetics and law. In cities, it is embodied in the planning and restriction of land use in the form of legal norms in order to conform to the aesthetics of urban landscape. The aesthetic norms in land use planning in the United States belong to the category of police power, which has experienced three stages: judicial rejection, incidental recognition and individual recognition, and has played an important role in the aesthetic protection of historical blocks and landmarks. Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the legal system of urban land zoning in China has lacked the necessary "aesthetic clauses". Our country should establish the independent protection value of aesthetics with the principle norm when constructing the aesthetic norm of urban land regionalization, and make specific and operable aesthetic clauses on the basis of fully demonstrating the connection between aesthetics and other public interests. Establishing the system of citizen participation and introducing "environmental right"; carrying on the key "esthetics protection" to the special area; constructing the system of "regionalization reward and punishment".
【作者單位】： 鄭州大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重點項目“提高農(nóng)民在征地過程中土地增值收益分配比例立法研究”(項目編號:13AFX006)
【分類號】：B834.2;D971.2
，

本文編號：2365584