【摘要】：龐德(1870—1964)美國(guó)著名法學(xué)家,其一生筆耕不輟,著作豐富,影響深遠(yuǎn)。特別是對(duì)中國(guó)有十分深刻的影響,曾任中華民國(guó)政府法律顧問(wèn),當(dāng)時(shí)中國(guó)正處于西法東漸的繁榮時(shí)期,龐德這樣的法學(xué)家的理論,也自然就被介紹到中國(guó)來(lái),為中國(guó)法治建設(shè)提供理論素材。 本文試圖對(duì)龐德利益理論的相關(guān)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討,闡述龐德社會(huì)學(xué)法理學(xué)的重點(diǎn)和靈魂,即社會(huì)利益論。對(duì)其進(jìn)行深入的理解和反思,從中汲取精華,為我所用。全文除導(dǎo)論之外全文共四部分,導(dǎo)論主要是對(duì)龐德的理論背景做簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明,對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)研究龐德的文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行綜述和概括。 第一部分主要是對(duì)龐德著作的理解和概括,梳理穿插于龐德繁多和復(fù)雜論述中的社會(huì)利益論,提煉出支撐龐德理論的框架結(jié)構(gòu),進(jìn)行分析概括,勾勒出社會(huì)利益論的全貌,并對(duì)現(xiàn)有一個(gè)的爭(zhēng)論提出自己的觀點(diǎn)。第二部分主要是從對(duì)1905年美國(guó)洛克納案的分析、美國(guó)對(duì)憲法修正案的解釋、憲法改革和羅斯福新政,探討龐德的社會(huì)利益論在現(xiàn)實(shí)中受到的重視的原因,論證龐德提出的社會(huì)利益論取代自然權(quán)利論的主張的可行性,從側(cè)面讓我們了解龐德的社會(huì)利益論,使他的理論具有現(xiàn)實(shí)性和有說(shuō)服力。第三部分主要從實(shí)用主義哲學(xué)的角度分析龐德的社會(huì)利益論,利用新實(shí)用主義者理查德·羅蒂的對(duì)實(shí)用主義特征的概括,來(lái)說(shuō)明龐德社會(huì)利益論的一些深層次的蘊(yùn)涵,剖析龐德社會(huì)利益論在當(dāng)今社會(huì)失去影響力的原因。第四部分主要是對(duì)龐德社會(huì)利益論可能存在的不足探討,依據(jù)美國(guó)社會(huì)法學(xué)家弗里德曼對(duì)“利益”和“利益的要求”區(qū)分理論,探討龐德的社會(huì)利益論可能陷入的誤區(qū)。最后在此基礎(chǔ)上運(yùn)用龐德社會(huì)利益論,對(duì)中國(guó)有關(guān)社會(huì)利益的問(wèn)題提出有意義的建議。
[Abstract]:Pound (1870-1964) a famous American jurist whose work was abundant and far-reaching. In particular, it has a very profound impact on China. Zeng Ren Zhonghua was a legal adviser to the Republic of China government. At that time, China was in the midst of a prosperous period of western-eastern France. The theory of jurists like pound was naturally introduced to China. To provide theoretical material for the construction of China's rule of law. This paper attempts to discuss the related problems of pound's interest theory, and expounds the focus and soul of pound's sociological jurisprudence, that is, social interest theory. Deeply understand and reflect on it, draw the essence from it, and use it for me. In addition to the introduction, the full text is composed of four parts. The introduction is mainly a brief explanation of pound's theoretical background, and a summary of the domestic literature on pound. The first part is mainly about the understanding and generalization of pound's works, combing the social interest theory interspersed in pound's numerous and complicated expositions, abstracting the frame structure that supports pound's theory, analyzing and generalizing it, and sketching out the whole picture of social interest theory. And the existing one of the argument put forward their own point of view. The second part is mainly from the analysis of the 1905 Lockna case in the United States, the American interpretation of the constitutional amendment, the constitutional reform and Roosevelt's New deal, and discusses the reasons why pound's theory of social interests has been attached importance to in reality. To demonstrate the feasibility of pound's theory of social interests replacing the theory of natural rights, from the side let us understand pound's theory of social interests, so that his theory is realistic and persuasive. The third part mainly analyzes pound's theory of social interest from the perspective of pragmatism philosophy, and uses Richard Rorty's generalization of the characteristics of pragmatism to explain some profound implications of pound's theory of social interest. This paper analyzes the reasons why pound's theory of social interest has lost its influence in today's society. The fourth part mainly discusses the possible shortcomings of pound's theory of social interest. According to Friedman's theory of distinction between "interest" and "requirement of interest", the author discusses the misunderstanding that pound's theory of social interest may fall into. Finally, based on pound's theory of social interest, the author puts forward some meaningful suggestions on China's social interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D909.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳維維;利益導(dǎo)向型計(jì)劃生育工作創(chuàng)新的實(shí)證研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2334706