論司法判決中的法律解釋
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-04 08:07
【摘要】：我們生活在法律的調(diào)控之中,以法律為準(zhǔn)繩。但是,法律是什么?當(dāng)法律沉默不語、含混不清或模棱兩可時,它又如何統(tǒng)攝一切呢?對此,人們的回答都訴諸于法律解釋。法律解釋作為一門古老的學(xué)問,到近代逐漸發(fā)展已成為相對獨立的智識貢獻(xiàn)來源。 從法律解釋的歷史發(fā)展來看,各國的法律學(xué)者對法律解釋從各個不同的側(cè)面進(jìn)行了深入而有益的探索,并取得了較大的進(jìn)展。近二十年來我國社會主義民主與法制建設(shè)取得了令人矚目的成就,社會主義法制不斷到加強(qiáng)和完善,不少法律工作者和學(xué)者都十分重視法律解釋及其研究,提出了許多建議。隨著社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展,即使是經(jīng)過周密思考而制定的成文法,面對日新月異、變化異常的客觀情況也只能是相對完善,法律的不完善性不斷在實踐中顯現(xiàn);如果從理解的意義上認(rèn)識法律解釋,那么可以說,法律解釋乃是法律的生命之所在。因為沒有人理解、解釋和運(yùn)用法律,法律便沒有任何價值。因此,對法律的解釋也就自然而然地成了法律人的迫切任務(wù)。 從理論上說,有法律,就有對法律的理解和解釋活動,從法律適用意義上講,法律適用的過程即是法律解釋的過程。而對社會生活具有終局裁量權(quán)的司法活動而言,研究其判決中的法律解釋顯得尤為重要。這不僅關(guān)系到司法判決的結(jié)果是否公正,同時也將影響整個司法活動的運(yùn)行。本文對法律解釋問題的探討,從對法律解釋的宏觀分析入手,立足于司法判決這個大背景,著重分析了司法判決中法律解釋的對象,即法律規(guī)范和法律事實,以及在實際操作過程中解釋的方法等問題。 本文共分為以下部分: 第一部分,前言。 第二部分,法律解釋概述部分。在這一部分中,通過對法律解釋的概念界定、法律解釋的主體及法律解釋權(quán)、法律解釋的情形、法律解釋的對象等問題的分析,以求得對法律解釋活動的初步認(rèn)識。 第三部分,司法判決的架構(gòu)及法律解釋部分。在這一部分中,文章從司法判決的架構(gòu)入手,切入到司法判決中的兩大核心因素——法律事實和裁判規(guī)范,并通過分析法律事實的認(rèn)定過程和裁判規(guī)范的形成過程,闡釋了司法判決中法律解釋的兩大對象的特點。 第四部分,司法判決中的法律解釋技術(shù)。在這一部分中,文章以方法論的分析模式,通過對解釋的基本要求,解釋的方法的分析,粗略探討了在司法判決中如何進(jìn)行法律解釋這一問題。 本文的粗淺研究,為法律解釋如何與司法判決相聯(lián)系提供了參考意見,希望籍此文能對人們正確認(rèn)識司法裁判中法律解釋的實質(zhì)、培養(yǎng)法官法律解釋的自覺意識和提高其解釋方法、技術(shù)的運(yùn)用能力以妥當(dāng)?shù)剡m用法律、公正地解決實際問題有所稗益。
[Abstract]:We live in the regulation of the law, with the law as the yardstick. But what is the law? When the law is silent, vague or ambiguous, how does it control everything? To this, people's answer all resort to legal explanation. As an ancient knowledge, legal interpretation has gradually developed into a relatively independent source of intellectual contribution in modern times. From the historical development of legal interpretation, legal scholars of various countries have made a deep and beneficial exploration of legal interpretation from different aspects, and have made great progress. In the past two decades, great achievements have been made in the construction of socialist democracy and legal system in China. The socialist legal system has been continuously strengthened and perfected. Many legal workers and scholars attach great importance to legal interpretation and research, and put forward many suggestions. With the rapid development of social economy, even after careful thinking, the statutory law, faced with the rapid changes, the objective situation of abnormal changes can only be relatively perfect, and the imperfections of the law continue to appear in practice; If we understand the interpretation of law in the sense of understanding, it can be said that the interpretation of law is the life of law. Because no one understands, interprets and applies the law, the law has no value. Therefore, the interpretation of the law naturally becomes the urgent task of the legal person. In theory, there is law, there is the understanding and interpretation of law. In the sense of law application, the process of law application is the process of legal interpretation. For the judicial activities with final discretion in social life, it is particularly important to study the legal interpretation in its judgment. This not only relates to the justice of the judicial decision, but also affects the operation of the whole judicial activity. Based on the macro analysis of legal interpretation and the background of judicial judgment, this paper analyzes the object of legal interpretation in judicial decision, namely, legal norms and legal facts. As well as in the actual operation process explanation method and so on. This article is divided into the following parts: the first part, preface. The second part is an overview of legal interpretation. In this part, through the analysis of the definition of the concept of legal interpretation, the subject of legal interpretation and the power of legal interpretation, the situation of legal interpretation, the object of legal interpretation, and so on, the preliminary understanding of the activities of legal interpretation is obtained. The third part, the structure and legal interpretation of judicial decision. In this part, starting with the structure of judicial decision, the article cuts into the two core factors of judicial decision, namely, legal facts and adjudicative norms, and through analyzing the process of determining the legal facts and the forming process of the adjudicative norms, This paper explains the characteristics of the two objects of legal interpretation in judicial decision. The fourth part, the legal interpretation technology in the judicial decision. In this part, through the analysis of the basic requirements of interpretation and the method of interpretation, the article roughly discusses how to interpret the law in the judicial decision. The brief study of this paper provides a reference for how to link the legal interpretation with the judicial decision, hoping that this article can give people a correct understanding of the essence of the legal interpretation in the judicial adjudication. It is beneficial to cultivate the conscious consciousness of the judge's legal interpretation and to improve its interpretation method, to apply the law properly, and to solve the practical problems fairly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90
本文編號：2309238
[Abstract]:We live in the regulation of the law, with the law as the yardstick. But what is the law? When the law is silent, vague or ambiguous, how does it control everything? To this, people's answer all resort to legal explanation. As an ancient knowledge, legal interpretation has gradually developed into a relatively independent source of intellectual contribution in modern times. From the historical development of legal interpretation, legal scholars of various countries have made a deep and beneficial exploration of legal interpretation from different aspects, and have made great progress. In the past two decades, great achievements have been made in the construction of socialist democracy and legal system in China. The socialist legal system has been continuously strengthened and perfected. Many legal workers and scholars attach great importance to legal interpretation and research, and put forward many suggestions. With the rapid development of social economy, even after careful thinking, the statutory law, faced with the rapid changes, the objective situation of abnormal changes can only be relatively perfect, and the imperfections of the law continue to appear in practice; If we understand the interpretation of law in the sense of understanding, it can be said that the interpretation of law is the life of law. Because no one understands, interprets and applies the law, the law has no value. Therefore, the interpretation of the law naturally becomes the urgent task of the legal person. In theory, there is law, there is the understanding and interpretation of law. In the sense of law application, the process of law application is the process of legal interpretation. For the judicial activities with final discretion in social life, it is particularly important to study the legal interpretation in its judgment. This not only relates to the justice of the judicial decision, but also affects the operation of the whole judicial activity. Based on the macro analysis of legal interpretation and the background of judicial judgment, this paper analyzes the object of legal interpretation in judicial decision, namely, legal norms and legal facts. As well as in the actual operation process explanation method and so on. This article is divided into the following parts: the first part, preface. The second part is an overview of legal interpretation. In this part, through the analysis of the definition of the concept of legal interpretation, the subject of legal interpretation and the power of legal interpretation, the situation of legal interpretation, the object of legal interpretation, and so on, the preliminary understanding of the activities of legal interpretation is obtained. The third part, the structure and legal interpretation of judicial decision. In this part, starting with the structure of judicial decision, the article cuts into the two core factors of judicial decision, namely, legal facts and adjudicative norms, and through analyzing the process of determining the legal facts and the forming process of the adjudicative norms, This paper explains the characteristics of the two objects of legal interpretation in judicial decision. The fourth part, the legal interpretation technology in the judicial decision. In this part, through the analysis of the basic requirements of interpretation and the method of interpretation, the article roughly discusses how to interpret the law in the judicial decision. The brief study of this paper provides a reference for how to link the legal interpretation with the judicial decision, hoping that this article can give people a correct understanding of the essence of the legal interpretation in the judicial adjudication. It is beneficial to cultivate the conscious consciousness of the judge's legal interpretation and to improve its interpretation method, to apply the law properly, and to solve the practical problems fairly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 蘇力;當(dāng)代中國法律中的習(xí)慣——一個制定法的透視[J];法學(xué)評論;2001年03期
2 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于印發(fā)《人民法院五年改革綱要》的通知[J];中華人民共和國最高人民法院公報;1999年06期
3 曾慶華;法律條文邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];法學(xué)探索.貴州省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;1994年01期
4 張全興;法律概念的構(gòu)成及其邏輯特征[J];四川省公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;1996年02期
5 王焱林;關(guān)于法律條文的句式探討[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1997年05期
6 鄒列強(qiáng);論我國法律條文的結(jié)構(gòu)[J];孝感師專學(xué)報;1999年01期
7 沈宗靈;;論法律解釋[J];中國法學(xué);1993年06期
8 陳金釗;司法過程中的法律發(fā)現(xiàn)[J];中國法學(xué);2002年01期
9 孫國華 ,郭華成;法律解釋新論[J];政治與法律;1988年05期
10 陳金釗;論法律解釋權(quán)的構(gòu)成要素[J];政治與法律;2004年01期
，本文編號：2309238
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2309238.html
