天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 法理論文 >

法律方法研究的實(shí)踐面向

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-01 18:46
【摘要】:21世紀(jì)以來,法律方法受到了學(xué)界的普遍關(guān)注,法律方法研究呈蓬勃發(fā)展之勢(shì)。然而,一方面,學(xué)界有關(guān)法律方法問題的探討逐漸呈現(xiàn)出兩種不同的研究進(jìn)路,造成了法律方法研究“實(shí)踐面向”或者“理論面向”的困惑:其一為對(duì)有關(guān)法律實(shí)踐工作方式方法的經(jīng)驗(yàn)、原理和理論的系統(tǒng)研究,其二為對(duì)西方法學(xué)方法論與法哲學(xué)思想的哲理化研究;另一方面,與法律方法研究的方興未艾形成反差的是,從現(xiàn)有的研究成果看,國內(nèi)鮮有從從宏觀立場上對(duì)該研究領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行歸納和反思。本文將立足國內(nèi)已有的法律方法研究成果,梳理、總結(jié)國內(nèi)法律方法研究的名稱爭議和研究對(duì)象變遷歷程,進(jìn)而歸納并闡述法律方法研究的立場和定位在于其實(shí)踐面向。 第一部分,問題的提出。主要介紹選題背景和研究現(xiàn)狀,并交待本文需要論述與回答的問題。 第二部分,從概念的形成看法律方法研究的實(shí)踐面向。由于研究角度和方法不盡相同,國內(nèi)學(xué)者對(duì)“法律方法”的概念有著不同的認(rèn)識(shí)。本部分通過對(duì)“法律方法”這一概念形成的過程闡明:從“法本體”中剝離出“法學(xué)方法”,從“法學(xué)方法”剝離出“法律方法”,再從“法律方法”中剝離“法律方法論”,這一過程,是法律方法研究逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)實(shí)踐面向的過程。 第三部分,從研究對(duì)象的變遷看法律方法研究的實(shí)踐面向。我國的法律方法研究是從法律解釋開始的,在21世紀(jì)后學(xué)界對(duì)多種法律方法進(jìn)行了深入的研究,近兩年來部分法律方法研究者結(jié)合法律實(shí)踐在新的領(lǐng)域展開了法律方法研究。本部分通過對(duì)法律方法研究對(duì)象變遷的評(píng)述闡明:從法律解釋到多種法律方法,再到近兩年來法律方法研究的新領(lǐng)域,法律方法研究對(duì)象變遷的歷史是逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)實(shí)踐面向的歷史。 第四部分,法律方法研究如何深化實(shí)踐面向。本部分分別從立足我國法律制度的法律方法研究、加強(qiáng)法學(xué)家與法律家的聯(lián)系、注重法學(xué)教育中的法律方法訓(xùn)練等三個(gè)方面,展開論述法律方法研究應(yīng)當(dāng)如何堅(jiān)持其實(shí)踐面向的立場定位,以完成其面向?qū)嵺`、回應(yīng)實(shí)踐的理論使命。
[Abstract]:Since the 21 st century, the legal method has received the universal attention of the academic circles, the legal method research presents the vigorous development tendency. However, on the one hand, there are two different approaches to the study of legal methods in academic circles. This has led to the confusion of "practice-oriented" or "theory-oriented" in the study of legal methods: first, a systematic study of the experience, principles and theories of the methods of working in legal practice, The second is to study the philosophy of western law methodology and philosophy of law. On the other hand, in contrast to the rising research on legal methods, from the existing research results, there are few from the macro point of view to summarize and reflect on the research field. This article will base on the domestic legal method research achievement, combs, summarizes the domestic legal method research name dispute and the research object vicissitude, then induces and explains the legal method research stand and the localization lies in its practice face. The first part is the raising of the question. This paper mainly introduces the background and research status of the topic, and explains the questions that need to be discussed and answered in this paper. The second part, from the formation of the concept to see the practice of legal methods. Because the research angle and method are different, domestic scholars have different understanding of the concept of "legal method". This part clarifies the process of forming the concept of "legal method": stripping "legal method" from "legal Noumenon", "legal method" from "legal method", and "legal Methodology" from "legal method". This process, is the legal method research step by step realization of practice oriented process. The third part, from the change of the object of study to see the practice of legal methods. The study of legal method in our country begins with the interpretation of law. After the 21st century, many kinds of legal methods have been deeply studied in academic circles. In the past two years, some researchers of legal methods have carried out research on legal methods in new fields combined with the practice of law. This part expounds the changes of the research object of legal method: from legal interpretation to various legal methods, and then to the new field of legal method research in the last two years. The history of the vicissitude of the object of study of legal method is the history of realizing the practice gradually. The fourth part, the legal method research how to deepen the practice face. In this part, the author studies the legal methods based on the legal system of our country, strengthens the connection between jurists and jurists, and pays attention to the training of legal methods in legal education. In order to fulfill its theoretical mission of facing practice and responding to practice, the research on legal method should stick to its position of facing practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孔小紅;法律解釋的理論和實(shí)踐[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1988年03期

2 胡興東;;中國古代判例法模式研究——以元清兩朝為中心[J];北方法學(xué);2010年01期

3 汪慶紅;;地方立法監(jiān)督實(shí)證研究:體制與程序[J];北方法學(xué);2010年06期

4 張利春;;法學(xué)家的方法論研究對(duì)法律實(shí)務(wù)家的影響——以日本的經(jīng)驗(yàn)為視角[J];比較法研究;2009年01期

5 羅智敏;;從鄧玉嬌案看民眾“干預(yù)”司法的若干問題[J];比較法研究;2009年06期

6 黃文藝;;論法學(xué)方法論的幾個(gè)問題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1993年04期

7 馬朱炎;我國社會(huì)主義法律解釋原則[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1987年02期

8 解興權(quán);法律推理的涵義、性質(zhì)及其功能[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年06期

9 陶凱元;中國法律解釋制度現(xiàn)狀之剖析[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年06期

10 葛洪義;試論法律論證的源流與旨趣[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期



本文編號(hào):2304778

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2304778.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶84722***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com