法律方法研究的實(shí)踐面向
[Abstract]:Since the 21 st century, the legal method has received the universal attention of the academic circles, the legal method research presents the vigorous development tendency. However, on the one hand, there are two different approaches to the study of legal methods in academic circles. This has led to the confusion of "practice-oriented" or "theory-oriented" in the study of legal methods: first, a systematic study of the experience, principles and theories of the methods of working in legal practice, The second is to study the philosophy of western law methodology and philosophy of law. On the other hand, in contrast to the rising research on legal methods, from the existing research results, there are few from the macro point of view to summarize and reflect on the research field. This article will base on the domestic legal method research achievement, combs, summarizes the domestic legal method research name dispute and the research object vicissitude, then induces and explains the legal method research stand and the localization lies in its practice face. The first part is the raising of the question. This paper mainly introduces the background and research status of the topic, and explains the questions that need to be discussed and answered in this paper. The second part, from the formation of the concept to see the practice of legal methods. Because the research angle and method are different, domestic scholars have different understanding of the concept of "legal method". This part clarifies the process of forming the concept of "legal method": stripping "legal method" from "legal Noumenon", "legal method" from "legal method", and "legal Methodology" from "legal method". This process, is the legal method research step by step realization of practice oriented process. The third part, from the change of the object of study to see the practice of legal methods. The study of legal method in our country begins with the interpretation of law. After the 21st century, many kinds of legal methods have been deeply studied in academic circles. In the past two years, some researchers of legal methods have carried out research on legal methods in new fields combined with the practice of law. This part expounds the changes of the research object of legal method: from legal interpretation to various legal methods, and then to the new field of legal method research in the last two years. The history of the vicissitude of the object of study of legal method is the history of realizing the practice gradually. The fourth part, the legal method research how to deepen the practice face. In this part, the author studies the legal methods based on the legal system of our country, strengthens the connection between jurists and jurists, and pays attention to the training of legal methods in legal education. In order to fulfill its theoretical mission of facing practice and responding to practice, the research on legal method should stick to its position of facing practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D90
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孔小紅;法律解釋的理論和實(shí)踐[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1988年03期
2 胡興東;;中國古代判例法模式研究——以元清兩朝為中心[J];北方法學(xué);2010年01期
3 汪慶紅;;地方立法監(jiān)督實(shí)證研究:體制與程序[J];北方法學(xué);2010年06期
4 張利春;;法學(xué)家的方法論研究對(duì)法律實(shí)務(wù)家的影響——以日本的經(jīng)驗(yàn)為視角[J];比較法研究;2009年01期
5 羅智敏;;從鄧玉嬌案看民眾“干預(yù)”司法的若干問題[J];比較法研究;2009年06期
6 黃文藝;;論法學(xué)方法論的幾個(gè)問題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1993年04期
7 馬朱炎;我國社會(huì)主義法律解釋原則[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1987年02期
8 解興權(quán);法律推理的涵義、性質(zhì)及其功能[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年06期
9 陶凱元;中國法律解釋制度現(xiàn)狀之剖析[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年06期
10 葛洪義;試論法律論證的源流與旨趣[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期
,本文編號(hào):2304778
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2304778.html