天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 法理論文 >

“如實報道”不實傳聞的法律責任——上世紀80年代后期徐良名譽權(quán)案引發(fā)的爭論

發(fā)布時間:2018-10-25 12:50
【摘要】:正1987年《民法通則》生效,公民名譽權(quán)正式納入民法保護,這一年以侵害名譽權(quán)起訴媒體和記者的案件陡然增多,有"告記者熱"之說;許多案件發(fā)生在報業(yè)發(fā)達的上海。有一起名譽權(quán)案在當時引起很大關(guān)注,原因有二:一是原告人是一位名人、著名歌手徐良,他是軍人,在1979年中越邊界戰(zhàn)事的老山戰(zhàn)斗中失去了雙腿,改行唱歌,一曲《血染的風采》風靡全國。二是案情涉及如何認定新聞失實及其責任問題,涉案新聞是一篇會議報道,"如實報道"了會上的發(fā)言,但是發(fā)言的內(nèi)容不實,那么這篇新聞?wù)鎸崋?如果要承擔責任,是報道的媒體和記者,還是
[Abstract]:In 1987, the General principles of Civil Law came into effect, and the right of reputation of citizens was formally protected by civil law. In this year, the number of cases suing the media and journalists for infringing on the right of reputation has increased steeply, and there is the theory of "suing journalists." many cases have taken place in Shanghai, where the newspaper industry is well developed. There was a right of reputation case that aroused great concern at that time for two reasons: first, the plaintiff was a celebrity, famous singer Xu Liang, who was a soldier. He lost his legs during the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese border war in Laoshan, and changed his profession to sing songs. A song "blood dyed style" swept the country. Second, the case involves how to identify the false news and its responsibility, the news involved is a conference report, "truthfully reported" the speech at the meeting, but the content of the speech is not true, so the news is true? If the responsibility is to be borne, is it the media and the reporter, o
【分類號】:D923;D920.5
,

本文編號:2293740

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2293740.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶3696b***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com