【摘要】：隨著人們對(duì)法律方法的關(guān)注度不斷提高,法律論證理論作為一個(gè)重要的研究領(lǐng)域也在不斷發(fā)展并取得重要地位。但是,在我國(guó),對(duì)法律論證的研究還是近年來(lái)的事情,法律論證作為尋求法治合法性的一種理論追求,承載著一項(xiàng)重要使命,即尋求達(dá)致司法公正、實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)正義之方法,法律論證的出現(xiàn)及合理運(yùn)用增強(qiáng)了司法裁決的合理性和可接受性,作為近幾年的研究熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,一個(gè)科學(xué)、合理的論證體系在很大程度上決定著法律論證能否充分發(fā)揮其功能。 本文以唯物辯證法為視角,在探討法律論證一般理論的基礎(chǔ)上,以司法實(shí)踐中判決的可接受性為導(dǎo)向,對(duì)法律論證的研究進(jìn)路、運(yùn)行模式等進(jìn)行分析,為構(gòu)建可接受的法律論證體系奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。唯物辯證法作為認(rèn)識(shí)世界最普遍的方法,唯物辯證法規(guī)律是自然和人類(lèi)社會(huì)發(fā)展的規(guī)律也是認(rèn)識(shí)的規(guī)律。在對(duì)可接受的法律論證體系構(gòu)建過(guò)程中起著重要的作用,主要體現(xiàn)在唯物辯證法規(guī)律在對(duì)法律事實(shí)的證立、法律規(guī)范的證立以及對(duì)二者之間的一致性的證立過(guò)程中的作用。 法律論證的目的就是為司法裁判提供可接受的理由,一個(gè)司法判決要能夠被人們所接受,必須具備客觀性,而客觀性的實(shí)現(xiàn)需要在法律事實(shí)的真、法律規(guī)范的正當(dāng)性以及合法律性三個(gè)方面來(lái)體現(xiàn)。 本文致力于馬克思主義哲學(xué)和法學(xué)的融合,在司法過(guò)程中構(gòu)建一個(gè)客觀的法律論證證立標(biāo)準(zhǔn),通過(guò)運(yùn)用論證方法,實(shí)現(xiàn)個(gè)案裁判之公正,彰顯法治之目標(biāo)。這對(duì)于法律論證貫徹于司法實(shí)踐有一定的積極意義。
[Abstract]:With the increasing attention to legal methods, the theory of legal argumentation, as an important research field, has been developing and gaining an important position. However, in our country, the research on legal argumentation is still a matter of recent years. As a theoretical pursuit of seeking legitimacy of the rule of law, legal argumentation carries an important mission, that is, to seek a way to achieve judicial justice and social justice. The appearance and reasonable application of legal argumentation enhance the rationality and acceptability of judicial adjudication. As a hot research issue in recent years, a scientific and reasonable system of argumentation determines to a great extent whether legal argumentation can give full play to its function. Based on the general theory of legal argumentation and the acceptability of judgment in judicial practice, this paper, from the perspective of materialist dialectics, analyzes the research approach and operation mode of legal argumentation. It lays a theoretical foundation for the construction of an acceptable system of legal argumentation. Materialist dialectics is the most common method of understanding the world, and the law of materialist dialectics is the law of the development of nature and human society as well as the law of cognition. It plays an important role in the construction of acceptable legal argumentation system, which is mainly embodied in the role of materialist dialectics in the process of establishing legal facts, legal norms and the consistency between them. The purpose of legal argumentation is to provide acceptable reasons for the administration of justice. In order to be accepted by people, a judicial decision must be objective, and the realization of objectivity needs to be based on the truth of legal facts. The legitimacy and conformity of legal norms are embodied in three aspects. This paper is devoted to the fusion of Marxist philosophy and jurisprudence, and constructs an objective standard of legal argumentation in the course of judicature. By using the method of argumentation, we can realize the justice of case adjudication and highlight the goal of rule by law. This has certain positive significance for legal argumentation to carry out in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D90-051

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉國(guó)章;;馬克思唯物辯證法的新探索[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

2 焦寶乾;;法律論證的幾個(gè)基本理論問(wèn)題[J];比較法研究;2005年06期

3 孫旭武;陳穎;;論唯物辯證法的特質(zhì)及其意義[J];長(zhǎng)春工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

4 車(chē)紅蘭,金成哲;馬克思主義唯物辯證法與和諧觀[J];東疆學(xué)刊;2005年02期

5 葛洪義;試論法律論證的源流與旨趣[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

6 黃如松;;馬克思主義唯物辯證法的方法論特征及其革命意義[J];黨史文苑;2009年24期

7 陳金釗;法律論證的理論探尋[J];東岳論叢;2005年01期

8 Ch.佩雷爾曼;朱慶育;;法律推理[J];法律方法;2003年00期

9 Ch.佩雷爾曼;朱慶育;;法律與修辭學(xué)[J];法律方法;2003年00期

10 王曉;;走出困境:法律論證的認(rèn)識(shí)論再思考[J];法商研究;2007年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 焦寶乾;法律論證理論研究[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 傅曉;法律論證研究[D];河南大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2236951