試論清末“虛擬死罪”改革
[Abstract]:Fictitious death penalty is a special phenomenon under the legal system of Qing Dynasty. It refers to a situation in which the death penalty is drawn up according to the law, but the execution of the death penalty is not obtained after the autumn trial, and can be suspended or reduced according to the convention. The emergence of virtual capital crime is based on the Qing Dynasty unique legal system, such as the Qing Dynasty legislation will be divided into the execution of the death penalty and prison, perfect Qiu court trial and so on for the emergence of the virtual death penalty conditions. There are three kinds of fictitious capital crime: play kill, manslaughter and tampering. This paper combs the conviction and sentencing of these three crimes in the past dynasties, and compares them with the legislation of the Qing Dynasty. It was found that the punishment of the three charges in Qing Dynasty was slightly heavier than that in the Ming Dynasty, especially in the Tang Dynasty, which was one of the internal reasons for the fictitious death penalty reform. The loss of extraterritorial jurisdiction and the spread of western legal culture prompted the Qing government to formulate new laws in line with international standards. The minister of law revision put forward the reform of fictitious death penalty on the basis of accepting the western advanced criminal law concept and analyzing the traditional criminal law. The reform has removed the death penalty prison provisions for murder, manslaughter, and changed them directly to live-sentence or imprisonment, although some people have raised objections to the reform. However, the Qing government finally approved the reform and legalized the achievements through the enactment of the current Criminal Law of the Qing Dynasty. The success of the reform is of great significance to the system construction of Qing Dynasty and the ideology of later generations. It prompted the Qing Dynasty to carry on the reform in the autumn court, a series of reform measures made the autumn trial system change greatly, and finally withdrew from the historical stage. The reform of fictitious death penalty also changed people's concept of death penalty at that time, made the upper class of Qing Dynasty accept the advanced western criminal law thought, and laid an ideological foundation for the later establishment of death penalty system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D929;D924
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李啟成;領(lǐng)事裁判權(quán)制度與晚清司法改革之肇端[J];比較法研究;2003年04期
2 陳永生;對我國死刑復(fù)核程序之檢討——以中國古代及國外的死刑救濟(jì)制度為視角[J];比較法研究;2004年04期
3 李國青;張之洞與清末法制改革[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2002年03期
4 劉建;;清末至民國時期死刑觀念變革淺探[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年06期
5 錢大群;中國刑法史上不可磨滅的一頁——評沈家本對犯罪主觀心態(tài)之研究[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);1991年02期
6 于建勝,張禮恒;伍廷芳與清末新政法律改革[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期
7 李欣榮;;吉同鈞與清末修律[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2009年06期
8 梁根林,何慧新;二十世紀(jì)的中國刑法學(xué)<上>[J];中外法學(xué);1999年02期
9 李交發(fā);簡論沈家本的廢除死刑觀[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年01期
10 周國均,鞏富文;我國古代死刑復(fù)核制度的特點(diǎn)及其借鑒[J];中國法學(xué);2005年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張國臣;《大清現(xiàn)行刑律》初探[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2008年
,本文編號:2228380
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2228380.html