【摘要】：隨著法學(xué)和語言學(xué)的融合及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)的深入研究,法律語言學(xué)家在立法和司法活動(dòng)中的重要性日趨凸顯。從國內(nèi)外所發(fā)表的學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)來看,法律語言學(xué)家對(duì)立法的完善具有重要作用,同時(shí)法律語言學(xué)家通過對(duì)法規(guī)、合同等法律文本所涉及的法律爭(zhēng)議問題的詮釋出庭作證將有助于司法活動(dòng)目的的實(shí)現(xiàn)。尤其是,法律語言學(xué)家作為專家證人在涉及到語言爭(zhēng)議的案件中起到至關(guān)重要的作用,因?yàn)槠胀ㄈ松踔潦欠ü俚确山缛耸慷疾豢赡芫ㄕZ言和法律語言。雖然法律語言學(xué)已確立并不斷完善,對(duì)于許多陪審團(tuán)、法官、律師及其他法學(xué)專家仍舊是新鮮事物。法律語言學(xué)家在我國司法活動(dòng)中的重要性并沒有被大眾甚至法學(xué)專家所承認(rèn)。法律屆人士并不認(rèn)為語言學(xué)家在法學(xué)領(lǐng)域具有專業(yè)知識(shí),他們認(rèn)為那是他們的領(lǐng)域。然而,著名學(xué)者麥考密的觀點(diǎn)“法學(xué)其實(shí)不過是一門法律語言學(xué)”有力地闡明了法律與語言學(xué)的緊密關(guān)系,法學(xué)人士的這種觀點(diǎn)顯然并不正確。 在我國,已出現(xiàn)一些涉及到語言爭(zhēng)議問題的案件開始向語言學(xué)家求助,但是由于各種法律因素及以上所述原因,實(shí)際成效并不見好。然而事實(shí)上,在普通法系許多國家,法律語言學(xué)家作為專家證人在其司法活動(dòng)中都具有極其重要價(jià)值,有利于案件的各方以及法官判案。由此,本文將對(duì)法律語言學(xué)家作為專家證人在我國司法活動(dòng)中的價(jià)值進(jìn)行嘗試研究,以期我國法學(xué)界重視語言學(xué)的價(jià)值,承認(rèn)語言學(xué)家的專業(yè)性并給與其施展專業(yè)才能的空間,這將不僅有利于完善我國現(xiàn)有的鑒定人制度也有利于法律語言學(xué)理論應(yīng)用的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the integration of law and linguistics and the in-depth study of applied linguistics, the importance of legal linguists in legislative and judicial activities has become increasingly prominent. From the academic point of view published at home and abroad, legal linguists play an important role in the perfection of legislation. At the same time, legal linguists adopt laws and regulations. The interpretation of legal disputes involved in legal texts such as contracts will be helpful to the realization of judicial activities. In particular, legal linguists, as expert witnesses, play a crucial role in cases involving language disputes, because ordinary people, even legal professionals such as judges, are unlikely to be proficient in language and legal language. Although forensic linguistics has been established and perfected, it is still new to many juries, judges, lawyers and other legal experts. The importance of legal linguists in judicial activities in China has not been recognized by the public or even legal experts. Law professionals do not think linguists have expertise in the field of law, they think it is their field. However, the famous scholar McCormick's view that "Law is in fact nothing more than a legal linguistics" powerfully clarifies the close relationship between law and linguistics, which is obviously not true. In China, some cases involving language disputes have begun to turn to linguists for help. However, due to various legal factors and the above-mentioned reasons, the actual results are not good. In fact, in many common law countries, legal linguists, as expert witnesses, have extremely important value in their judicial activities, which is beneficial to the parties to the case as well as to the judges. Therefore, this paper will try to study the value of legal linguists as expert witnesses in the judicial activities of our country, in the hope that the jurists in our country will attach importance to the value of linguistics, recognize the professionalism of linguists and give them space to exert their professional talents. This will not only be conducive to the improvement of the existing system of experts in China, but also conducive to the development of the application of forensic theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90-055

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 吳偉平;法律語言學(xué)的研究方法[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);2002年01期

2 胡志清;司法語言學(xué)及司法語言學(xué)家的四大專家領(lǐng)域[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);2002年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2221770