論社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的權(quán)利沖突
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-30 10:42
【摘要】：目前,中國社會(huì)正處于一個(gè)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期。在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的快速發(fā)展,人們的價(jià)值觀、權(quán)利觀都會(huì)發(fā)生一定的變化,整個(gè)社會(huì)也必定會(huì)出現(xiàn)一些在以往社會(huì)中不曾出現(xiàn)的問題和矛盾,一些新的權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象也會(huì)表現(xiàn)得越來越明顯,在這種情況下,我們就必須正視這些權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象,以一種客觀、合理的態(tài)度去對(duì)待它們。從社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的角度去思考權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象,對(duì)權(quán)利沖突理論的完善,對(duì)建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國家的目標(biāo),都具有非常重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 考察社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象,首先要明確界定當(dāng)前中國社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,充分理解作為社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的權(quán)利沖突是一種怎樣的沖突。中國的社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期在中國歷史上是一個(gè)前所未有的時(shí)期,這個(gè)時(shí)期對(duì)人們生活、社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展影響是非常巨大的,自20世紀(jì)90年代以來,中國確立了要建設(shè)社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制,中國經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的發(fā)展進(jìn)入了一個(gè)快速發(fā)展的階段,從這個(gè)時(shí)候起,中國社會(huì)進(jìn)入了一個(gè)新的社會(huì)發(fā)展期,社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的含義這個(gè)時(shí)段得到了充分的體現(xiàn)。因此本文界定的社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期是從這個(gè)時(shí)候開始的。由于權(quán)利觀念的復(fù)雜性,導(dǎo)致權(quán)利沖突理論也具有很大的爭議性,從不同的角度觀察權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象可以得出不同的結(jié)論,權(quán)利沖突理論的發(fā)展在當(dāng)前我們的法學(xué)研究中還處于一個(gè)初始的階段,需要我們逐步去完善。 在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中,作為權(quán)利主體的個(gè)人或者組織,任何時(shí)候都可能會(huì)處于一種權(quán)利沖突的狀態(tài)中。這種權(quán)利沖突可以表現(xiàn)出一種相互交錯(cuò)的態(tài)勢,以權(quán)利存在形態(tài)的角度來看,社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期權(quán)利沖突主要是關(guān)于道德權(quán)利和法律權(quán)利之間的沖突,在不同權(quán)利主體之間也會(huì)出現(xiàn)一種法律權(quán)利的權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象。在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象是普遍的但同時(shí)又具有很大的特殊性,這種特殊性主要是因?yàn)橹袊鐣?huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的特點(diǎn)所決定的。在中國社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,整個(gè)社會(huì)的變化是全方位的,從經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展到社會(huì)進(jìn)步,從個(gè)人生活到社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu),從城市到農(nóng)村,種種變化對(duì)中國社會(huì)發(fā)展軌跡產(chǎn)生了一種加速度的效應(yīng),因這些變化而表現(xiàn)出來的權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象涵蓋了人們社會(huì)生活的方方面面,比如牽涉到人們切身利益的房子、教育、就業(yè)、醫(yī)療等等問題。 在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,產(chǎn)生權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的原因多種多樣,但大致可以從權(quán)利本身內(nèi)外這兩個(gè)角度來考慮。首先就權(quán)利本身所具有的性質(zhì)來看,權(quán)利沖突并不是如蘇力先生所認(rèn)為的那樣,權(quán)利沖突不能等同于權(quán)利的相互性,權(quán)利具有相互性只是產(chǎn)生權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的一個(gè)方面,法律的不確定性導(dǎo)致的權(quán)利界限模糊也是發(fā)生權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的一個(gè)重要原因。在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期發(fā)生的權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象,更多的可以從權(quán)利本身外的因素來考察,這些因素在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的長期存在決定了社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期內(nèi)權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象必然會(huì)是一個(gè)長期的、難以消除的現(xiàn)象。在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期這樣一個(gè)特殊的歷史時(shí)期,由于存在資源短缺、權(quán)利主體多元化、個(gè)人權(quán)利意識(shí)蓬勃發(fā)展以及現(xiàn)行法律與現(xiàn)實(shí)存在差距等等現(xiàn)象,權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生無論在廣度上還是在深度上都與中國以往的社會(huì)階段具有很大的不同。 一個(gè)社會(huì)存在權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象是必然的,在處于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的中國社會(huì),權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn)更是不可避免。我們不能回避但同時(shí)也不應(yīng)慌張,應(yīng)該采取正確的態(tài)度去對(duì)待這些權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象,在解決社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的權(quán)利沖突的過程中,我們首先要遵循一定的原則,同時(shí)也要有相應(yīng)的解決途徑。對(duì)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期權(quán)利沖突的解決,我們要堅(jiān)持維護(hù)憲法的根本法地位,不能違背憲法基本規(guī)定,要兼顧個(gè)人正當(dāng)權(quán)益和社會(huì)公共利益,做到兩者的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一,從立法的途徑去完善法律規(guī)定,做到有法可依,從司法的角度去解決權(quán)利沖突問題,做到有法必依。只有這樣,社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的權(quán)利沖突問題才能得到更好的認(rèn)識(shí),我們對(duì)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的思考才更具有意義。 對(duì)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的思考,既是權(quán)利沖突理論發(fā)展的需要,同時(shí)也是社會(huì)發(fā)展對(duì)法學(xué)理論學(xué)習(xí)者的要求。通過對(duì)它的研究,我們一方面可以加深對(duì)權(quán)利沖突理論的認(rèn)識(shí),另一方面還可以讓理論更好的服務(wù)于社會(huì)發(fā)展,促進(jìn)社會(huì)的健康持續(xù)發(fā)展。社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象是不可避免的,一個(gè)社會(huì)存在權(quán)利沖突是一種正常的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,我們不能漠視權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的存在,但也不能對(duì)此感到悲觀失望,束手無策。我們相信,中國社會(huì)在經(jīng)過了這樣一個(gè)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期后,通過我們對(duì)權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象的認(rèn)真處理,我們的社會(huì)會(huì)變得越來越美好。
[Abstract]:At present, China's society is in a period of social transformation. In the period of social transformation, with the rapid development of economy and society, people's values and views of rights will change to a certain extent, and the whole society will inevitably have some problems and contradictions that have never appeared in the past society, and some new conflicts of rights will be more and more manifested. Obviously, in this case, we must face up to these conflicts of rights and treat them with an objective and reasonable attitude. It is of great practical significance to consider the conflicts of rights from the perspective of social transformation, to perfect the theory of conflicts of rights, and to build a socialist country ruled by law.
To investigate the phenomenon of conflict of rights in the period of social transformation, we should first clearly define the current period of social transformation in China and fully understand what kind of conflict the conflict of rights is in the period of social transformation. Ever since the 1990s, China has established a socialist market economic system, and the development of China's economy and society has entered a stage of rapid development. Since then, China has entered a new period of social development, and the meaning of the period of social transformation has been fully reflected. Because of the complexity of the concept of rights, the theory of conflict of rights is also very controversial. Observing the phenomenon of conflict of rights from different angles, we can draw different conclusions. The development of the theory of conflict of rights is still in an initial stage in our current legal research. We should gradually improve.
In real life, as the subject of rights, individuals or organizations may be in a state of conflict of rights at any time. This kind of conflict of rights can show a cross-cutting situation. From the perspective of the existing form of rights, the conflict of rights in social transformation options is mainly about the impact between moral rights and legal rights. In the period of social transformation, the conflict of rights is universal but also has great particularity. This particularity is mainly determined by the characteristics of the period of social transformation in China. In the period of social transformation, the change of the whole society is all-round. From economic development to social progress, from personal life to social structure, from cities to countryside, all kinds of changes have an accelerating effect on China's social development trajectory. The conflicts of rights manifested by these changes cover all aspects of people's social life, such as houses involving people's vital interests. Education, employment, medical care and so on.
In the period of social transformation, there are many reasons for the conflict of rights, but it can be considered from both inside and outside the right itself. First of all, according to the nature of the right itself, the conflict of rights is not equal to the reciprocity of rights, as Mr. Su Li thought. Conflict of rights is one of the phenomena of conflict of rights. The ambiguity of the boundaries of rights caused by the uncertainty of law is also an important reason for the phenomenon of conflict of rights. During the period of social transformation, the conflict of rights will inevitably be a long-term phenomenon, which is difficult to eliminate. In such a special historical period, because of the shortage of resources, the diversification of the subject of rights, the vigorous development of individual rights awareness and the gap between the current law and reality, the conflict of rights will occur regardless of whether or not. In terms of breadth or depth, they are quite different from China's past social stages.
Conflict of rights is inevitable in a society, and it is even more inevitable in a transitional Chinese society. We can not avoid it, but we should not panic at the same time. We should adopt a correct attitude to deal with these conflicts of rights. First of all, we must abide by certain principles, and at the same time, we must also have corresponding solutions. To solve the conflict of rights and interests in social transformation, we must uphold the fundamental status of the Constitution, not violate the basic provisions of the Constitution, take into account the legitimate rights and interests of individuals and social public interests, achieve the organic unity of the two, and improve the law from the legislative approach. Only in this way can we get a better understanding of the conflict of rights in the period of social transformation, and our thinking of the conflict of rights in the period of social transformation is more meaningful.
It is not only the need of the development of the theory of conflict of rights, but also the requirement of the social development for the learners of the theory of law. Through the study of it, we can deepen the understanding of the theory of conflict of rights on the one hand, on the other hand, we can make the theory better serve the social development and promote the society. Conflict of rights and interests in social transformation is inevitable. Conflict of rights in a society is a normal social phenomenon. We can't ignore the existence of conflict of rights, but we can't feel pessimistic and hopeless about it. We believe that after such a period of social transformation, China's society has gone through a period of social transformation. Through our careful handling of the conflict of rights, our society will become more and more beautiful.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90
本文編號(hào)：2212830
[Abstract]:At present, China's society is in a period of social transformation. In the period of social transformation, with the rapid development of economy and society, people's values and views of rights will change to a certain extent, and the whole society will inevitably have some problems and contradictions that have never appeared in the past society, and some new conflicts of rights will be more and more manifested. Obviously, in this case, we must face up to these conflicts of rights and treat them with an objective and reasonable attitude. It is of great practical significance to consider the conflicts of rights from the perspective of social transformation, to perfect the theory of conflicts of rights, and to build a socialist country ruled by law.
To investigate the phenomenon of conflict of rights in the period of social transformation, we should first clearly define the current period of social transformation in China and fully understand what kind of conflict the conflict of rights is in the period of social transformation. Ever since the 1990s, China has established a socialist market economic system, and the development of China's economy and society has entered a stage of rapid development. Since then, China has entered a new period of social development, and the meaning of the period of social transformation has been fully reflected. Because of the complexity of the concept of rights, the theory of conflict of rights is also very controversial. Observing the phenomenon of conflict of rights from different angles, we can draw different conclusions. The development of the theory of conflict of rights is still in an initial stage in our current legal research. We should gradually improve.
In real life, as the subject of rights, individuals or organizations may be in a state of conflict of rights at any time. This kind of conflict of rights can show a cross-cutting situation. From the perspective of the existing form of rights, the conflict of rights in social transformation options is mainly about the impact between moral rights and legal rights. In the period of social transformation, the conflict of rights is universal but also has great particularity. This particularity is mainly determined by the characteristics of the period of social transformation in China. In the period of social transformation, the change of the whole society is all-round. From economic development to social progress, from personal life to social structure, from cities to countryside, all kinds of changes have an accelerating effect on China's social development trajectory. The conflicts of rights manifested by these changes cover all aspects of people's social life, such as houses involving people's vital interests. Education, employment, medical care and so on.
In the period of social transformation, there are many reasons for the conflict of rights, but it can be considered from both inside and outside the right itself. First of all, according to the nature of the right itself, the conflict of rights is not equal to the reciprocity of rights, as Mr. Su Li thought. Conflict of rights is one of the phenomena of conflict of rights. The ambiguity of the boundaries of rights caused by the uncertainty of law is also an important reason for the phenomenon of conflict of rights. During the period of social transformation, the conflict of rights will inevitably be a long-term phenomenon, which is difficult to eliminate. In such a special historical period, because of the shortage of resources, the diversification of the subject of rights, the vigorous development of individual rights awareness and the gap between the current law and reality, the conflict of rights will occur regardless of whether or not. In terms of breadth or depth, they are quite different from China's past social stages.
Conflict of rights is inevitable in a society, and it is even more inevitable in a transitional Chinese society. We can not avoid it, but we should not panic at the same time. We should adopt a correct attitude to deal with these conflicts of rights. First of all, we must abide by certain principles, and at the same time, we must also have corresponding solutions. To solve the conflict of rights and interests in social transformation, we must uphold the fundamental status of the Constitution, not violate the basic provisions of the Constitution, take into account the legitimate rights and interests of individuals and social public interests, achieve the organic unity of the two, and improve the law from the legislative approach. Only in this way can we get a better understanding of the conflict of rights in the period of social transformation, and our thinking of the conflict of rights in the period of social transformation is more meaningful.
It is not only the need of the development of the theory of conflict of rights, but also the requirement of the social development for the learners of the theory of law. Through the study of it, we can deepen the understanding of the theory of conflict of rights on the one hand, on the other hand, we can make the theory better serve the social development and promote the society. Conflict of rights and interests in social transformation is inevitable. Conflict of rights in a society is a normal social phenomenon. We can't ignore the existence of conflict of rights, but we can't feel pessimistic and hopeless about it. We believe that after such a period of social transformation, China's society has gone through a period of social transformation. Through our careful handling of the conflict of rights, our society will become more and more beautiful.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 辛顯文;論社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的利益分化[J];北方論叢;2005年02期
2 張平華;;權(quán)利沖突辨[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期
3 郝鐵川;權(quán)利沖突:一個(gè)不成為問題的問題[J];法學(xué);2004年09期
4 龐正;論權(quán)利沖突[J];江海學(xué)刊;1999年06期
5 蘇力;《秋菊打官司》案、邱氏鼠藥案和言論自由[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年03期
6 王克金;權(quán)利沖突論——一個(gè)法律實(shí)證主義的分析[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2004年02期
7 王克金;;權(quán)利沖突研究中需要進(jìn)一步澄清的問題[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2010年05期
8 李常青;權(quán)利沖突之辨析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年03期
9 劉旺洪;權(quán)利本位的理論邏輯——與童之偉教授商榷[J];中國法學(xué);2001年02期
10 劉作翔;權(quán)利沖突的幾個(gè)理論問題[J];中國法學(xué);2002年02期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)所研究員、博士生導(dǎo)師 劉作翔;[N];北京日報(bào);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 張曉月;權(quán)利沖突的成因分析及其解決[D];重慶大學(xué);2006年
2 趙楊;權(quán)利沖突之原因分析[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年
3 張小龍;權(quán)利沖突現(xiàn)象及其解決[D];四川大學(xué);2006年
4 韓濤;權(quán)利沖突研究[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2007年
5 楊立乾;權(quán)利位階幻象[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年
，本文編號(hào)：2212830
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2212830.html
