【摘要】：“把法律作為修辭”的論文,提出和闡述了“把法律作為修辭”的理論。但這一理論的學術研究還停留在理論命題的基本闡釋,證明其理論合理性的論證中。循理論應用的思路,辯明“把法律作為修辭”的法律修辭理論的方法論意義,以“法律解釋、法律邏輯與法律修辭構成了法律方法的基礎理論”為理論前提,具體闡述法律修辭與法律解釋、法律修辭與法律邏輯的關系。闡明法律修辭與法律解釋作為方法論領域的共享與理論目標與研究對象上的區(qū)別;以把法律作為修辭為視角,探究法律邏輯對于裁判聽眾說服的意義。通過對基本方法論的論證,闡述把法律作為修辭理論的方法論可能與意義,以期助力法律修辭理論在中國法治建設語境中的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:This paper puts forward and expounds the theory of taking law as rhetoric. But the academic research of this theory is still in the basic explanation of the theoretical proposition and the proof of its theoretical rationality. Following the train of thought of theoretical application, this paper identifies the methodological significance of the legal rhetoric theory "taking law as rhetoric", and takes "legal interpretation, legal logic and legal rhetoric as the basic theory of legal method" as the theoretical premise. The relationship between legal rhetoric and legal interpretation, legal rhetoric and legal logic is elaborated in detail. This paper clarifies the differences between legal rhetoric and legal interpretation as a field of methodology, and explores the significance of legal logic to the persuasion of referees from the perspective of taking law as rhetoric. Through the argumentation of the basic methodology, this paper expounds the methodological possibility and significance of taking the law as the rhetoric theory, in order to help the development of the legal rhetoric theory in the context of the construction of the rule of law in China.
，

本文編號：2200873