中美經濟法比較研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-08 15:33
【摘要】：中國和美國分屬不同的政治制度和法系,經濟法也呈現出各自不同的特征,這是由于兩國不同的歷史發(fā)展軌跡和特殊的歷史背景、文化背景、經濟背景所決定的。但是作為社會主義經濟法的中國經濟法與作為資本主義經濟法的美國經濟法并不是完全不同的,二者之前存在著一定的共性,這是現代經濟法的內在特征所決定的。本文意在從中美兩國經濟法比較之中,發(fā)現資本主義經濟法和社會主義經濟法的共性和不同之處,為我國經濟法對資本主義經濟法的借鑒提供理論參考。具體來講,中美經濟法的產生模式不同、經濟民主與經濟集中的程度不同、宏觀調控的力度不同等。但是二者都是現代經濟法,都是國家之手和市場之首的協同并用,體現著政策性和經濟性特征,其內在一致性也使得二者存在著相互借鑒的可能。在對美國資本主義經濟法的借鑒過程中,要充分認識到經濟法領域法律移植的重要性,選擇適當的制度進行移植,并且在移植的過程中要注意本土化問題和適當的超前立法,為我國經濟法法制現代化和社會主義和諧社會的建設做出貢獻。
[Abstract]:China and the United States belong to different political systems and legal systems, and economic law also presents different characteristics, which is determined by the different historical development tracks and special historical background, cultural background and economic background of the two countries. However, the Chinese economic law as the socialist economic law is not completely different from the American economic law as the capitalist economic law. There are certain commonalities between them, which is determined by the inherent characteristics of the modern economic law. The purpose of this paper is to find out the commonness and difference between capitalist economic law and socialist economic law from the comparison of economic law between China and the United States, and to provide a theoretical reference for the reference of Chinese economic law to capitalist economic law. Specifically, the economic laws of China and the United States are produced in different modes, the degree of economic democracy and economic concentration is different, and the intensity of macro-control is not equal. However, both of them are modern economic law, and they are the coordination of the hands of the country and the head of the market, which embodies the characteristics of policy and economy, and their internal consistency also makes it possible for them to draw lessons from each other. In the process of drawing lessons from the American capitalist economic law, we should fully realize the importance of legal transplantation in the field of economic law, choose the appropriate system to transplant, and pay attention to the localization problem and appropriate advanced legislation in the process of transplantation. It contributes to the modernization of the legal system of economic law and the construction of a harmonious socialist society.
【學位授予單位】：首都經濟貿易大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;D922.29
本文編號：2172227
[Abstract]:China and the United States belong to different political systems and legal systems, and economic law also presents different characteristics, which is determined by the different historical development tracks and special historical background, cultural background and economic background of the two countries. However, the Chinese economic law as the socialist economic law is not completely different from the American economic law as the capitalist economic law. There are certain commonalities between them, which is determined by the inherent characteristics of the modern economic law. The purpose of this paper is to find out the commonness and difference between capitalist economic law and socialist economic law from the comparison of economic law between China and the United States, and to provide a theoretical reference for the reference of Chinese economic law to capitalist economic law. Specifically, the economic laws of China and the United States are produced in different modes, the degree of economic democracy and economic concentration is different, and the intensity of macro-control is not equal. However, both of them are modern economic law, and they are the coordination of the hands of the country and the head of the market, which embodies the characteristics of policy and economy, and their internal consistency also makes it possible for them to draw lessons from each other. In the process of drawing lessons from the American capitalist economic law, we should fully realize the importance of legal transplantation in the field of economic law, choose the appropriate system to transplant, and pay attention to the localization problem and appropriate advanced legislation in the process of transplantation. It contributes to the modernization of the legal system of economic law and the construction of a harmonious socialist society.
【學位授予單位】：首都經濟貿易大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;D922.29
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前9條
1 唐立軍;李書友;;建立和完善我國市場監(jiān)管體系的思路、目標與措施[J];北京工商大學學報(社會科學版);2008年01期
2 趙靜波;;淺論美國宏觀調控法給我國的啟示[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術學院學報;2008年10期
3 ;外國(地區(qū))企業(yè)常駐機構登記管理的問題及對策[J];中國工商管理研究;2005年07期
4 郭曦;;20世紀90年代以來的美國宏觀調控政策評述[J];價格月刊;2006年01期
5 侯平;周廉;張海波;;外籍人員個人所得稅征管中存在的主要問題[J];經濟研究參考;2006年79期
6 李勝利;;殊途同歸的東西方經濟法[J];經濟法論叢;2008年02期
7 沈宗靈;論法律移植與比較法學[J];外國法譯評;1995年01期
8 徐自強;外國企業(yè)常駐代表機構的稅收征管存在問題的思考[J];揚州大學稅務學院學報;2004年03期
9 朱小川;;金融危機中的美國立法——簡評《緊急經濟穩(wěn)定法案》[J];中國金融;2008年22期
，本文編號：2172227
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2172227.html
