淺議麥考密克的制度法理論
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-08 11:44
【摘要】：制度法學(xué)是英國(guó)法學(xué)家尼爾·麥考密克和奧地利法學(xué)家?jiàn)W塔·魏因貝格爾共同創(chuàng)立的法學(xué)理論,本文著重介紹的是麥考密克的制度法理論。制度法理論通過(guò)制度道德理論將部分道德原則納入到了法律的范疇、通過(guò)制度事實(shí)理論融合了法律規(guī)范性與現(xiàn)實(shí)性之間的鴻溝,頗具創(chuàng)新精神。本文主要以分析實(shí)證主義的分離命題和社會(huì)事實(shí)命題為視角,梳理制度法理論構(gòu)建的背景及其理論框架,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)制度法理論的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值給予客觀評(píng)價(jià)。文章將按照以下框架展開(kāi)論述: 導(dǎo)言:通過(guò)文章的寫(xiě)作動(dòng)機(jī)引入文章的主題,然后簡(jiǎn)略介紹制度法學(xué)的基本情況和目前國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)界的研究現(xiàn)狀,進(jìn)而提出本文的寫(xiě)作目標(biāo)和寫(xiě)作方法。 第一章:梳理分析制度法理論產(chǎn)生的背景和原因。麥考密克制度法理論的產(chǎn)生絕非偶然,這與當(dāng)時(shí)的學(xué)術(shù)爭(zhēng)論焦點(diǎn)和學(xué)術(shù)時(shí)代背景密不可分。從直接原因來(lái)看,制度法理論的產(chǎn)生緣起于規(guī)范主義和反規(guī)范主義之爭(zhēng)。制度法理論試圖通過(guò)“法是一種制度事實(shí)”的理論構(gòu)建,融合法律的規(guī)范性面向和社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)性面向,使規(guī)范性理論取得社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)性的發(fā)展。但從更深一層的原因來(lái)看,制度法理論的產(chǎn)生仍然是由于分析實(shí)證主義的兩大基本命題遭遇到了德沃金的猛烈攻擊。需要有一種理論來(lái)改良分離命題和社會(huì)事實(shí)命題,以重新鞏固分析實(shí)證的基本立場(chǎng)。 第二章:以分析實(shí)證主義基本命題為視角對(duì)麥考密克的制度法理論進(jìn)行重構(gòu)式介紹。制度道德理論和制度事實(shí)理論是麥考密克制度法理論的兩大核心,第二章介紹的是與分離命題相關(guān)聯(lián)的制度道德理論。文章首先闡述了麥考密克對(duì)德沃金理論框架的質(zhì)疑,提出必須界定一種不依賴(lài)于道德價(jià)值的“制度”方可說(shuō)明制度道德的形成。而這種制度其實(shí)是法律規(guī)則和法律原則的統(tǒng)一體。其次,通過(guò)實(shí)踐理性說(shuō)明承認(rèn)規(guī)則是如何將制度道德納入到法律的范疇中成為法律原則的。再次,證明制度道德理論仍然堅(jiān)持法律與道德邏輯上相分離的結(jié)論,堅(jiān)守分離命題。 第三章:介紹與社會(huì)事實(shí)命題聯(lián)系緊密的制度事實(shí)理論。制度事實(shí)理論認(rèn)為,法不僅在哲學(xué)意義上是一種制度體系,同時(shí)在社會(huì)學(xué)上也是一種制度現(xiàn)實(shí)。法這兩方面的特性緊密結(jié)合且不可分割。制度事實(shí)理論不僅強(qiáng)調(diào)了法是一種社會(huì)事實(shí),更進(jìn)一步明確了法是一種制度性事實(shí)。這也捍衛(wèi)和拓展了社會(huì)事實(shí)命題。 第四章:在確認(rèn)制度法理論分析實(shí)證立場(chǎng)的前提下,通過(guò)橫向比較闡述其在新分析法學(xué)范圍內(nèi)的理論價(jià)值,通過(guò)縱向比較闡述其在分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)范圍內(nèi)的理論價(jià)值。在新分析法學(xué)的范圍內(nèi),與拉茲和科爾曼的學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)相比,制度法理論在闡明法律原則、強(qiáng)調(diào)法律概念的作用和社會(huì)學(xué)研究方法的引入上均做出了比較顯著的貢獻(xiàn),但是其也存在體系性不足和模糊法律邊界的缺陷。在整個(gè)分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)范圍內(nèi),制度法理論的突出貢獻(xiàn)在于以解釋性觀點(diǎn)論證了分析法學(xué)的存在價(jià)值和學(xué)科界限,為分析法學(xué)注入了新的生機(jī)與活力。
[Abstract]:Institutional jurisprudence is a legal theory founded by British jurist Neil McCormick and Austria jurist Ota Weinberger. This article focuses on the introduction of Mccormick's theory of institutional law. The theory of institutional law incorporates some of the moral principles into the category of law through the theory of institutional ethics and combines the theory of institutional facts. In this paper, the background and theoretical framework of the construction of the theory of institutional law are combed and the academic value of the theory of institutional law is evaluated on the basis of the analysis of the separation proposition and social fact proposition of positivism. Discuss:
Introduction: introduce the theme of the article through the writing motivation of the article, and then briefly introduce the basic situation of institutional law and the current research status of the domestic academia, and then put forward the writing objectives and methods of writing.
Chapter one: to comb and analyze the background and cause of the theory of institutional law. The emergence of the theory of Mccormick's institutional law is not accidental. It is inseparable from the focus of academic debate and the background of academic times. From the direct reason, the origin of the theory of institutional law originated from the dispute between standardization and anti normalism. The theory of "law is a kind of institutional fact", which combines the normative orientation of the law and the social reality, and makes the normative theory achieve the development of social reality. But from a deeper reason, the emergence of the theory of institutional law is still due to the fierce attack of the two basic propositions of the analysis of positivism by Dworkin. A theory is needed to improve separation proposition and social fact proposition, so as to consolidate the basic position of analysis.
The second chapter: a reconstructive introduction to Mccormick's theory of institutional law is made from the perspective of the basic proposition of positivism. The theory of institutional morality and the theory of institutional fact are the two core of the theory of Mccormick's system law. The second chapter introduces the system morality theory associated with the separation proposition. The article first expounds Mccormick's virtue to Germany. The question of the framework of the woking theory suggests that a "system" which is not dependent on moral values can be defined as the formation of institutional morality. This system is actually a unity of legal rules and legal principles. Secondly, through practical reason, it is explained how the rules of recognition bring the system morality into the category of law and become the legal original. Thirdly, it proves that the theory of institutional morality still sticks to the conclusion that logic is separated from logic and adheres to separation proposition.
The third chapter introduces the system fact theory which is closely related to the social fact proposition. The system fact theory holds that law is not only a system system in philosophical sense, but also a kind of institutional reality in sociology. The characteristics of the two aspects of law are closely combined and inseparable. The system fact theory not only emphasizes that law is a social matter. It further clarifies that law is a systematic fact. It also safeguards and expands the social fact proposition.
The fourth chapter: on the premise of confirming the positivist position of the theoretical analysis of the institutional law, the theoretical value of it in the scope of the new analytical jurisprudence is expounded through the lateral comparison, and the theoretical value of it in the scope of the analysis of the positivist jurisprudence is expounded by the longitudinal comparison. In the scope of the new analytical law, the institutional law is compared with the academic views of Latz and Coleman. Theory has made a significant contribution to clarifying legal principles, emphasizing the role of legal concepts and the introduction of sociological research methods, but there are also shortcomings in the system and the boundary of fuzzy law. In the scope of the whole analysis of positivist jurisprudence, the outstanding contribution of the theory of institutional law lies in an explanatory point of view. The existence value and disciplinary boundaries of analytical jurisprudence have injected new vitality and vitality into analytical jurisprudence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D909.1
本文編號(hào)：2171688
[Abstract]:Institutional jurisprudence is a legal theory founded by British jurist Neil McCormick and Austria jurist Ota Weinberger. This article focuses on the introduction of Mccormick's theory of institutional law. The theory of institutional law incorporates some of the moral principles into the category of law through the theory of institutional ethics and combines the theory of institutional facts. In this paper, the background and theoretical framework of the construction of the theory of institutional law are combed and the academic value of the theory of institutional law is evaluated on the basis of the analysis of the separation proposition and social fact proposition of positivism. Discuss:
Introduction: introduce the theme of the article through the writing motivation of the article, and then briefly introduce the basic situation of institutional law and the current research status of the domestic academia, and then put forward the writing objectives and methods of writing.
Chapter one: to comb and analyze the background and cause of the theory of institutional law. The emergence of the theory of Mccormick's institutional law is not accidental. It is inseparable from the focus of academic debate and the background of academic times. From the direct reason, the origin of the theory of institutional law originated from the dispute between standardization and anti normalism. The theory of "law is a kind of institutional fact", which combines the normative orientation of the law and the social reality, and makes the normative theory achieve the development of social reality. But from a deeper reason, the emergence of the theory of institutional law is still due to the fierce attack of the two basic propositions of the analysis of positivism by Dworkin. A theory is needed to improve separation proposition and social fact proposition, so as to consolidate the basic position of analysis.
The second chapter: a reconstructive introduction to Mccormick's theory of institutional law is made from the perspective of the basic proposition of positivism. The theory of institutional morality and the theory of institutional fact are the two core of the theory of Mccormick's system law. The second chapter introduces the system morality theory associated with the separation proposition. The article first expounds Mccormick's virtue to Germany. The question of the framework of the woking theory suggests that a "system" which is not dependent on moral values can be defined as the formation of institutional morality. This system is actually a unity of legal rules and legal principles. Secondly, through practical reason, it is explained how the rules of recognition bring the system morality into the category of law and become the legal original. Thirdly, it proves that the theory of institutional morality still sticks to the conclusion that logic is separated from logic and adheres to separation proposition.
The third chapter introduces the system fact theory which is closely related to the social fact proposition. The system fact theory holds that law is not only a system system in philosophical sense, but also a kind of institutional reality in sociology. The characteristics of the two aspects of law are closely combined and inseparable. The system fact theory not only emphasizes that law is a social matter. It further clarifies that law is a systematic fact. It also safeguards and expands the social fact proposition.
The fourth chapter: on the premise of confirming the positivist position of the theoretical analysis of the institutional law, the theoretical value of it in the scope of the new analytical jurisprudence is expounded through the lateral comparison, and the theoretical value of it in the scope of the analysis of the positivist jurisprudence is expounded by the longitudinal comparison. In the scope of the new analytical law, the institutional law is compared with the academic views of Latz and Coleman. Theory has made a significant contribution to clarifying legal principles, emphasizing the role of legal concepts and the introduction of sociological research methods, but there are also shortcomings in the system and the boundary of fuzzy law. In the scope of the whole analysis of positivist jurisprudence, the outstanding contribution of the theory of institutional law lies in an explanatory point of view. The existence value and disciplinary boundaries of analytical jurisprudence have injected new vitality and vitality into analytical jurisprudence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D909.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張文顯;超越法律實(shí)證主義和自然法理論——制度法理學(xué)的認(rèn)識(shí)-方法論和本體論[J];比較法研究;1995年01期
2 唐仲清;法律制度的概念分析——讀弗里德曼《法律制度》、麥考密克、魏因貝格爾《制度法論》衍生的法哲學(xué)思辨[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
3 唐仲清;;對(duì)“制度事實(shí)”的法哲學(xué)思考[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期
4 范立波;;分離命題與法律實(shí)證主義[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年02期
5 陳銳;論法律實(shí)證主義[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期
6 陳金釗;;法律事實(shí)的定位與制度性事實(shí)——評(píng)《制度法論》[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;1999年01期
7 褚國(guó)建;;疑難案件與法律推理——麥考密克之《法律推理與法律理論》評(píng)析[J];清華法治論衡;2009年02期
8 朱峰;;法律實(shí)證主義的命題研究[J];法學(xué)論壇;2006年06期
9 中山龍一,周永勝;二十世紀(jì)法理學(xué)的范式轉(zhuǎn)換[J];外國(guó)法譯評(píng);2000年03期
10 支振鋒;;從社會(huì)事實(shí)到法律規(guī)范——作為社會(huì)實(shí)踐的法律[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2009年03期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 席琳;法律和道德的制度性結(jié)合[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年
2 王喬;新分析法學(xué)“社會(huì)事實(shí)命題”研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2008年
，本文編號(hào)：2171688
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2171688.html
教材專(zhuān)著
