【摘要】：社科法學強調(diào)對于"現(xiàn)實"與"中國"的關(guān)注,批評教義法學是一個不顧國情的舶來品,這樣的看法源于社科法學與教義法學對中國法律實踐的認識分歧。社科法學強調(diào)中國法律實踐中合法性評價的多元性,審判活動與日常判斷的相似性;而教義法學則主張實證法秩序在合法性評價上的權(quán)威性,以及審判活動中法律思維的特殊性。法學的跨領(lǐng)域研究必須從法學的立場出發(fā),法學理論并非現(xiàn)實的摹寫,社科法學在研究方法和理論主張兩方面都應有足夠的自覺。
[Abstract]:The social science law emphasizes the concern about "reality" and "China", and criticizes the doctrine law is an import which disregards the national conditions. This view originates from the different understanding of the Chinese legal practice between the social science law and the dogmatic law. Social science law emphasizes the pluralism of legitimacy evaluation in Chinese legal practice, the similarity between judicial activities and daily judgment, while the dogmatic jurisprudence advocates the authority of the order of positive law in legitimacy evaluation. And the particularity of legal thinking in judicial activities. The cross-domain research of law must proceed from the standpoint of law, the theory of law is not a realistic description, and the law of social science should be conscious enough in both the research method and the theory proposition.
【作者單位】： 南京大學法學院;南京大學中德比較法研究所;
【分類號】：D90
，

本文編號：2161768