【摘要】：新《國家賠償法》是伴隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的飛速發(fā)展、和諧社會的不斷健全以及以人為本的人權(quán)保障觀念的增強(qiáng)而誕生的,它明確了我國的賠償制度,是民主法制建設(shè)的重要成果,是國家對公民權(quán)利保護(hù)日益完善的標(biāo)志,它的修改,是社會的產(chǎn)物,是時(shí)代的產(chǎn)物,是一座新的里程碑,是會為歷史所見證的。 新《國家賠償法》做了許多修改,其中包括對于非正常死亡案件的賠償責(zé)任的舉證要實(shí)行舉證責(zé)任倒置原則。還有第三十五條明確精神損害賠償,這是本次修改后《國家賠償法》最大的亮點(diǎn),也是我國法律的一個(gè)最大進(jìn)步。這就是說,以后精神損害賠償有法律規(guī)定了。除上述幾點(diǎn)外,還有其他方面的改變,比如完善了賠償程序,在保障賠償支付費(fèi)用上,規(guī)定在賠償責(zé)任確定后,由賠償義務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)先向賠償請求人墊付賠償金,然后再向同級財(cái)政部門申請賠償費(fèi)用等。這些在本文中都將逐一地進(jìn)行論述。
[Abstract]:The new State compensation Law was born with the rapid development of China's market economy, the continuous improvement of harmonious society and the enhancement of human-oriented human rights protection concept. It clarifies the compensation system of our country. It is an important achievement of the construction of democracy and legal system and a symbol of the country's increasingly perfect protection of civil rights. Its modification is a product of the society, a product of the times, a new milestone, and will be witnessed by history. The new State compensation Law has made many amendments, including the principle of inversion of the burden of proof in case of abnormal death. There is also Article 35 specifically mental damage compensation, which is the biggest bright spot after the amendment of the State compensation Law, and is also the biggest progress of the law of our country. This is to say, after spirit damage compensation has legal regulation. In addition to the above, there have been changes in other aspects. For example, the compensation procedure has been improved. In terms of safeguarding compensation and paying expenses, it is stipulated that after the determination of the liability for compensation, the compensatory obligation organ shall first advance the compensation to the claimant for compensation. Then to the same level of financial departments to apply for compensation costs and so on. All these will be discussed one by one in this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.11;D931.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 齊建東;;論我國行政賠償歸責(zé)原則的完善[J];研究生法學(xué);2003年01期

2 金偉峰;國家侵權(quán)賠償中的違法責(zé)任原則[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年03期

3 張瑾;;關(guān)于侵犯公民人身權(quán)利的國家賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的研究[J];法制與社會;2007年02期

4 楊柳;楊毅;;國家賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的問題分析及完善[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2007年11期

5 何峻;日本國家賠償法研究[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1998年03期

6 王文君;論國家行政侵權(quán)賠償?shù)念~度[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

7 管宇;;《國家賠償法》修改研究述評[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

8 張劍;;論國家賠償中的精神損害賠償[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2007年06期

9 蘇曉純;;國家賠償中的精神損害賠償新論[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

10 莊會寧 ,黃玉蓉;法學(xué)專家談《國家賠償法》四個(gè)缺陷[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：2134935