【摘要】：尤爾根·哈貝馬斯是當今世界屈指可數(shù)的哲學(xué)家、社會學(xué)家、法學(xué)家。其研究的學(xué)說領(lǐng)域龐雜而高深，涵蓋社會科學(xué)的方方面面，在此僅就其所研究的法學(xué)領(lǐng)域中的一角——基本權(quán)利思想進行研究。 西方世界合法化危機與生活世界殖民化是哈貝馬斯基本權(quán)利思想的社會背景，交往行動理論、語用學(xué)以及倫理學(xué)構(gòu)成其權(quán)利思想產(chǎn)生的理論基礎(chǔ)。哈貝馬斯在批判與繼承的基礎(chǔ)上提出了在其思想中最具有原創(chuàng)性的商談理論，并進而提煉出構(gòu)成哈貝馬斯基本權(quán)利思想邏輯起源的商談原則。 在弄清楚商談原則之后，哈貝馬斯把商談原則導(dǎo)入至其基本權(quán)利思想之中，使得兩者不斷融合，使得哈貝馬斯的基本權(quán)利思想在商談原則基礎(chǔ)之上得以重構(gòu)。哈貝馬斯對當代基本權(quán)利以及基本權(quán)利體系進行重構(gòu)，在人權(quán)與人民主權(quán)統(tǒng)一的基礎(chǔ)上，把權(quán)利劃分為五大范疇，并且對這五大范疇進行分類，從而形成了哈貝馬斯基本權(quán)利體系。這部分是筆者研究的重點。 最后是對哈氏基本權(quán)利體系的客觀評價。哈貝馬斯基本權(quán)利思想崇高的研究價值毋庸置疑，但是缺點也不可避免，筆者僅就自身所發(fā)掘的相關(guān)優(yōu)缺點進行闡述，揭示了哈貝馬斯相關(guān)理論的創(chuàng)新性和局限性，，并通過同中國目前的權(quán)利建制現(xiàn)狀的比較，揭示了哈貝馬斯基本權(quán)利思想所具有的偉大的借鑒意義，尤其是同人權(quán)理論及中國人民代表大會制度的比較分析，更使得哈氏的人權(quán)思想、民主立法程序得以發(fā)揚光大，這也是筆者進行研究的真正目的。
[Abstract]:Jurgen Habermas is one of the few philosophers, sociologists and jurists in the world. His theoretical field is complex and profound, covering all aspects of social science. The crisis of legalization of the western world and the colonization of the world of life are the social background of Habermas' thought of basic rights, and the theory of communicative action, pragmatics and ethics constitute the theoretical basis for the emergence of Habermas's thought of right. On the basis of criticism and inheritance, Habermas put forward the most original negotiation theory in his thought, and then refined the negotiation principle which constituted the logical origin of Habermas's thought of basic rights. After clarifying the principle of negotiation, Habermas introduced the principle of negotiation into his thought of basic rights, which made the two of them merge constantly, and made Habermas's thought of basic rights reconstructed on the basis of the principle of negotiation. Habermas reconstructs the contemporary basic rights and the system of basic rights, divides the rights into five categories on the basis of the unity of human rights and people's sovereignty, and classifies these five categories. Thus formed Habermas basic right system. This part is the focus of my research. The last part is the objective evaluation of the basic right system. There is no doubt that Habermas's thought of basic rights is worthy of study, but its shortcomings are inevitable. The author only expounds the relative advantages and disadvantages, and reveals the innovation and limitation of Habermas' relevant theory. By comparing with the current situation of China's right system, this paper reveals the great significance of Habermas's thought of basic rights, especially the comparative analysis with the theory of human rights and the system of Chinese people's Congress. It also makes the thought of human rights and the democratic legislative process carry forward, which is the real purpose of my research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90


本文編號：2134814