【摘要】：法律與文學(xué)運(yùn)動(dòng)興起于美國�！皬奈膶W(xué)中了解法律”是該研究思潮的一個(gè)重要的方法論視角,其目的在于研究文學(xué)作品中所反映出來的法律,思考其中的法律理論與法律實(shí)踐問題�！端疂G傳》中潘金蓮案作為一個(gè)經(jīng)典的故事為大眾所熟知。從傳統(tǒng)文化的視角來看,潘金蓮被視為一個(gè)荒淫無度的反面人物,歷來為世人所不齒；而武松作為一名頂天立地、敢作敢為的漢子,其行為一直為世人所稱頌。而站在法律和文學(xué)的角度看,潘金蓮案則不再是個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的正義戰(zhàn)勝邪惡的文學(xué)故事,而是一起引人深思的法律事件。通過運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究、歷史背景剖析、實(shí)證分析和比較分析等方法,可以找出這起法律事件背后隱藏著的諸多法律問題。通奸行為指的是男女雙方?jīng)]有夫妻關(guān)系而發(fā)生性行為(多指一方或雙方已有配偶),它是一種客觀存在的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象。在潘金蓮案所處的宋代,統(tǒng)治階級(jí)制定了通奸罪,將其納入到刑法調(diào)整的范圍,并且分別從實(shí)體和程序方面對(duì)其進(jìn)行了規(guī)范。換言之,在潘金蓮案中,通奸罪具有可適用性,但偏偏未能適用,并導(dǎo)致了悲劇的產(chǎn)生。當(dāng)代社會(huì),通奸現(xiàn)象時(shí)有出現(xiàn),對(duì)于通奸行為是否入罪,曾引起過廣泛的爭(zhēng)議。到今天為止,仍有不少國家將通奸行為定罪處罰。我國自建國初期便廢除了通奸罪,將其納入到道德調(diào)整的范圍,只有在特定情況下才將其規(guī)定為犯罪,如破壞軍婚罪等。當(dāng)今許多國家將通奸行為納入到民法調(diào)整的范圍,并取得了較好的效果,這對(duì)我國如何應(yīng)對(duì)通奸行為應(yīng)該具有重要的借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:The movement of law and literature sprang up in the United States. "understanding the Law from Literature" is an important methodological perspective of this research trend. Its purpose is to study the law reflected in literary works. Considering the legal theory and legal practice, Pan Jinlian case is well known as a classic story in Water margin. From the point of view of traditional culture, Pan Jinlian is regarded as an abominable villain, who has always been disparaged by the world. From the point of view of law and literature, Pan Jinlian case is no longer a simple literary story of justice over evil, but a thought-provoking legal event. By using the methods of literature research, historical background analysis, empirical analysis and comparative analysis, we can find out many legal problems hidden behind this legal event. Adultery refers to the occurrence of sexual behavior between men and women without a marital relationship. It is an objective social phenomenon. In the Song Dynasty of Pan Jinlian case, the ruling class established the crime of adultery, brought it into the scope of the adjustment of criminal law, and regulated it from the aspect of entity and procedure. In other words, in Pan Jinlian's case, the crime of adultery is applicable, but it is not applicable, which leads to tragedy. In contemporary society, adultery occurs from time to time, which has caused widespread controversy as to whether adultery is criminalized. So far, many countries have convicted and punished adultery. Our country has abolished the crime of adultery since the beginning of the founding of the people's Republic of China and brought it into the scope of moral adjustment. Only under certain circumstances can it be defined as a crime, such as the crime of destroying military marriage, and so on. Nowadays, many countries bring adultery into the scope of civil law adjustment, and have achieved good results, which should be used for reference in how to deal with adultery in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D929;D924.3;I207.412

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 熊飛;;“團(tuán)頭”小考[J];辭書研究;1985年03期

2 劉云林;道德法律化的學(xué)理基礎(chǔ)及其限度[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年06期

3 何俊萍;論婚姻家庭領(lǐng)域道德調(diào)整與法律調(diào)整的關(guān)系──兼談對(duì)婚外戀的道德調(diào)整和法律調(diào)整[J];政法論壇;2000年03期

4 賀衛(wèi)方;;中國古代司法判決的風(fēng)格與精神——以宋代判決為基本依據(jù)兼與英國比較[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);1990年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐昕;論私力救濟(jì)[D];清華大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2127645