本文選題：多方參與方法專利 + 引誘侵權��； 參考：《重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版)》2016年06期

【摘要】：Akamai案中,美國聯(lián)邦巡回上訴法院在無單一方直接侵權的情況下做出了引誘侵權成立的全席判決,實施了對專利權的強保護;而聯(lián)邦最高法院重審認為這動搖了專利侵權的全要件基石,需由立法規(guī)定�？紤]到通過安排多方參與來逃避侵權責任的情形確實存在,云計算領域中撰寫也不能完全回避多方參與,從美國判例看,解決云計算多方參與方法專利侵權認定難題的可能路徑是放寬這種情形下直接侵權的判定標準。我國的應對措施可以是建立無意思聯(lián)絡的共同侵權責任規(guī)則,這樣既阻塞了多方參與實施專利以規(guī)避侵權責任的漏洞,又滿足了直接侵權的全要件原則,免除了無過錯方的責任。
[Abstract]:In the case of Akamai, the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals made the whole judgment of inducing the establishment of infringement without one party directly infringing, and implemented the strong protection of patent right. And the Supreme Court reconsidered that this shook the entire cornerstone of patent infringement and needed to be legislated. Considering that there is a situation in which tort liability can be evaded by arranging multi-party participation, writing in the field of cloud computing cannot completely avoid multi-party participation, as seen from US jurisprudence, The possible way to solve the problem of patent infringement in cloud computing is to relax the criterion of direct infringement. The countermeasures of our country can be the establishment of joint tort liability rules with no intention to contact, which not only obstructs the loopholes of participating in the implementation of patent in order to avoid tort liability, but also satisfies the principle of all elements of direct infringement. Dispense with the liability of the no-fault party.
【作者單位】： 南通大學管理學院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學研究規(guī)劃基金項目:云計算知識產(chǎn)權問題研究(12YJAZH116) 上海交通大學文理交叉專項基金重點項目:云計算知識產(chǎn)權問題研究(11JCZ04) 上海市軟件和集成電路產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展專項資金項目:云計算產(chǎn)業(yè)法律政策保障研究(滬經(jīng)信信(2012)698號)
【分類號】：D971.2;DD913
，

本文編號：2092556