論美國專利侵權(quán)中的懈怠抗辯及其借鑒
發(fā)布時間:2018-06-28 17:36
本文選題:專利侵權(quán)抗辯 + 懈怠制度 ; 參考:《北京化工大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文
【摘要】:美國專利法以及法官圍繞專利訴訟制定的判例法在專利權(quán)的產(chǎn)生、轉(zhuǎn)移、消滅、使用以及權(quán)利的限制和救濟(jì)方面形成了一個嚴(yán)密、負(fù)責(zé)、龐大的法律系統(tǒng)。美國法院在審理專利侵權(quán)訴訟中,根據(jù)衡平法的理論,通過判例對專利權(quán)進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步的限定。衡平法規(guī)定的抗辯主要有懈怠、禁止反悔、不潔之手原則等。本文擬對懈怠制度發(fā)展過程中有重要意義的1893年的萊恩·伯德利公司訴洛克案、1992年的奧克曼公司訴切尼斯建筑公司案、2002年的訊寶科技訴萊門森基金會案、2005年萊門森訴訊寶科技案四個案例進(jìn)行介紹與分析以期對專利侵權(quán)中懈怠抗辯的適用、效力與舉證責(zé)任問題有清晰的展示與解釋。 本文接下來對我國現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)中就專利侵權(quán)時效制度的規(guī)定予以介紹,并結(jié)合對案例的分析,展現(xiàn)我國法院在專利侵權(quán)訴訟中對訴訟時效制度的具體應(yīng)用,以及由此暴露出的專利權(quán)人惡意利用專利訴訟時效制度,在侵權(quán)開始時不主張權(quán)利,而等到侵權(quán)人不斷投資經(jīng)營發(fā)展壯大后,才要求侵權(quán)人承擔(dān)更大數(shù)額的侵權(quán)損害賠償及要求停止規(guī)模已經(jīng)變得更大的侵權(quán)行為的問題。 在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文對我國專利侵權(quán)抗辯中借鑒懈怠制度提出了相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:The patent law of the United States and the case law made by the judge around the patent action form a strict, responsible and huge legal system in the aspects of the generation, transfer, elimination, use, restriction and remedy of the patent right. According to the theory of equity, American courts have further limited patent rights in patent infringement litigation. The counterplea stipulated in equity mainly includes slackness, estoppel, unclean hand principle and so on. This paper intends to be of great significance to the development of the slack system in the 1893 case of Ryan Bradley Inc. v. Locke, 1992 Oakman Company v. Chenis Construction Company, 2002 Combo Technology v. Lemenson Foundation, 2005 Lemen This paper introduces and analyzes four cases in Sen v. Xinbao Science and Technology case in order to apply the slackness defense in patent infringement. The issues of validity and burden of proof are clearly demonstrated and explained. The article then introduces the provisions of the patent tort limitation system in the current laws and regulations of our country, and combined with the analysis of cases, it shows the concrete application of the limitation system in patent infringement litigation in our country. And the patent owner's malicious use of the patent limitation system, which reveals that the patentee does not claim the right at the beginning of the infringement, but after the infringer has continuously invested in the operation and developed, The problem of requiring the infringer to bear a larger amount of tort damages and to stop the infringement that has become larger. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward some relevant suggestions on the defense of patent infringement in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D923.42;D971.2
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 楊U,
本文編號:2078802
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2078802.html