本文選題：城市 + 法治發(fā)展　； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：我國城市法治發(fā)展具有差異是不爭的事實(shí)。法學(xué)界對此展開的研究呈現(xiàn)出一個有趣的現(xiàn)象。1.部分學(xué)者對客觀存在的“不平衡”現(xiàn)象重視不夠;2.部分學(xué)者認(rèn)真對待城市法治發(fā)展的差異,研究微觀層面的城市治理法治化問題,但對城市與法治發(fā)展關(guān)系的認(rèn)識存在盲點(diǎn);3.隨著我國城市問題的普遍化,更多學(xué)者從宏觀層面著手對各地差異進(jìn)行比較,但對比較中的“可比性”這一關(guān)鍵問題存在研究上的空白。本文正是對上述三個“模糊”問題展開探討。從城市與法治發(fā)展關(guān)系出發(fā),圍繞我國城市法治評估的可比性問題(能否比較、如何比較),對我國法治發(fā)展模式進(jìn)行研究。研究將夯實(shí)城市法治評估的基礎(chǔ),觀察轉(zhuǎn)型時期我國的法治發(fā)展方式,推動地方法治研究向縱深前進(jìn)。全文以日常生活實(shí)踐為研究視角,采用比較研究法,共五章,第一章與第五章為緒論與結(jié)論。第二章研究我國城市法治發(fā)展可比的基礎(chǔ),解決我國城市法治發(fā)展能否進(jìn)行比較的問題。我國的法治建設(shè)是在黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下統(tǒng)一推進(jìn)的。各地各級黨委領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部對法治的認(rèn)識與選擇存在差異,導(dǎo)致其所在的地方法治發(fā)展路徑不同,形成了特殊的城市法治發(fā)展的多樣性,這是可比的基礎(chǔ)。第三、第四章解決我國城市法治發(fā)展如何進(jìn)行比較的問題。其中,第三章研究我國城市的法治發(fā)展模式。我國城市是構(gòu)建型的法治發(fā)展模式。對我國城市進(jìn)行比較既可以揭示我國法治發(fā)展的多樣性與城市法治的具體樣態(tài),又可以對不同城市法治發(fā)展提供可資借鑒的方法與路徑。第四章研究我國城市法治發(fā)展可比的內(nèi)容。在比較具有重要意義的基礎(chǔ)上,以市民的自主性為城市法治建設(shè)的主要標(biāo)準(zhǔn),結(jié)合我國國情,推導(dǎo)出可比的主要內(nèi)容是權(quán)力制約與權(quán)利實(shí)現(xiàn)。同時,除了對上述兩方面的法律制度進(jìn)行比較,各地法治建設(shè)的工作方式也是值得比較的重要內(nèi)容。我國法治建設(shè)的重心在地方。研究我國城市法治發(fā)展的可比性,對法治中國進(jìn)程的推進(jìn)不無裨益!
[Abstract]:It is an indisputable fact that there are differences in the development of urban rule of law in China. There is an interesting phenomenon in the field of law. Some scholars pay less attention to the objective existence of "imbalance" phenomenon. Some scholars seriously treat the differences in the development of urban rule of law and study the issue of urban governance by law at the micro level, but there are blind spots in the understanding of the relationship between the city and the development of the rule of law. With the generalization of urban problems in China, more and more scholars begin to compare the regional differences from the macro level, but there is a gap in the study of the key issue of "comparability" in comparison. In this paper, the above three "fuzzy" problems are discussed. Based on the relationship between the city and the development of the rule of law, this paper studies the development mode of the rule of law in our country, focusing on the comparability of the evaluation of the rule of law in our country (whether or not and how to compare it). The research will consolidate the foundation of urban rule of law evaluation, observe the development mode of the rule of law in China during the transition period, and promote the study of local rule of law to advance in depth. From the perspective of daily life practice, this paper adopts comparative research method, which consists of five chapters, the first and fifth chapters are the introduction and conclusion. The second chapter studies the comparable basis of the development of urban rule of law in China, and solves the problem of whether the development of urban rule of law in China can be compared. Under the leadership of the Party, the construction of the rule of law in our country is promoted in a unified way. There are differences in the understanding and choice of the rule of law among the leading cadres of the Party committees at all levels, which leads to the different development paths of the local rule of law and forms the diversity of the development of the special urban rule of law, which is the basis of comparison. Third, the fourth chapter solves the problem of how to compare the development of urban rule of law in our country. Among them, the third chapter studies the development mode of the rule of law in Chinese cities. The city of our country is a constructive development mode of the rule of law. The comparison of Chinese cities can not only reveal the diversity of the development of the rule of law and the specific patterns of the urban rule of law, but also provide reference methods and paths for the development of different cities. The fourth chapter studies the comparable content of the development of urban rule of law in China. On the basis of comparative significance, taking citizen's autonomy as the main standard of urban rule of law construction, combined with the national conditions of our country, it is deduced that the comparable main content is power restriction and right realization. At the same time, in addition to the above two aspects of the legal system to compare, the construction of the rule of law in various areas of the work is also worth comparing the important content. The center of gravity of our country rule of law construction lies in the place. The study of the comparability of the development of urban rule of law in China is beneficial to the advancement of the process of the rule of law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D920.0
，

本文編號：2078738