本文選題：法律意識(shí) + 患者　； 參考：《北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：現(xiàn)有研究法律意識(shí)的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)中,理論研究成果比較豐富；存在部分對(duì)相關(guān)特定人群法律意識(shí)的調(diào)查分析,并簡(jiǎn)單歸納總結(jié)了法律意識(shí)的影響因素。但尚未出現(xiàn)針對(duì)患者這一群體進(jìn)行的法律意識(shí)研究,.缺少對(duì)患者法律意識(shí)現(xiàn)狀的全面把握�；诜梢庾R(shí)在價(jià)值判斷和行為規(guī)范等方面的重要性,本研究將客觀分析患者的法律意識(shí)現(xiàn)狀,確定患者法律意識(shí)的相關(guān)影響因素,以期為有效提高患者法律意識(shí)水平提供參考。方法：使用自制的問(wèn)卷,通過(guò)方便抽樣的方式,在桂林市A醫(yī)院和北京市B醫(yī)院分別調(diào)查150位患者。對(duì)調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行描述性統(tǒng)計(jì),客觀反映患者的法律意識(shí)現(xiàn)狀。并對(duì)相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)做正態(tài)性檢驗(yàn),然后根據(jù)正態(tài)性檢驗(yàn)的結(jié)果做以下統(tǒng)計(jì)分析：(1)采用兩組獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn)(參數(shù)檢驗(yàn))分析兩地患者法律意識(shí)自評(píng)總分是否存在差異；(2)采用兩個(gè)獨(dú)立樣本的非參數(shù)檢驗(yàn)(Wilcoxon秩和檢驗(yàn))對(duì)兩地法律意識(shí)各維度自評(píng)得分情況進(jìn)行比較；(3)采用多元線性回歸分析方法,以法律意識(shí)自評(píng)總分為因變量(Y),以性別、年齡、受教育程度、月均收入、職業(yè)類別、學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣、收到普法宣傳材料的頻率等因素為自變量(X),建立回歸模型,篩選患者法律意識(shí)的相關(guān)影響因素。結(jié)果：(1)兩地調(diào)查問(wèn)卷回收率均為100%,桂林市A醫(yī)院有效問(wèn)卷為132份,有效率為88.00%,北京市B醫(yī)院有效問(wèn)卷為140份,有效率為93.33%。兩地抽樣患者各個(gè)年齡段人數(shù)相對(duì)均衡,收入水平、城鄉(xiāng)人數(shù)比、受教育水平、職業(yè)分布等情況對(duì)兩地樣本總體有較好的代表性。(2)桂林市患者法律意識(shí)自評(píng)總分為92.71±7.65,法律知識(shí)水平、法律權(quán)利義務(wù)意識(shí)、法律服從和運(yùn)用、法律評(píng)價(jià)、法律心理等5個(gè)維度自評(píng)得分分別為16.88±2.90、19.89±2.23、18.71±2.35、18.53±2.08、18.70±2.29。一直主動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí)和了解法律法規(guī)知識(shí)的患者極少(2.27%),經(jīng)常收到普法宣傳材料的只占11.36%,多數(shù)患者認(rèn)為自主學(xué)習(xí)法律法規(guī)知識(shí)的效果一般(51.52%),法制節(jié)目是患者了解法律知識(shí)最主要的途徑(82.82%)和最喜愛(ài)的法制宣傳途徑(87.88%)。北京市患者法律意識(shí)自評(píng)總分為97.44±7.57,法律知識(shí)水平、法律權(quán)利義務(wù)意識(shí)、法律服從和運(yùn)用、法律評(píng)價(jià)、法律心理等5個(gè)維度自評(píng)得分分別為17.74±3.29、20.96±2.19、19.65±2.15、19.39±2.08、19.71±2.51。較少主動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí)法律知識(shí)的患者所占百分比較大(32.86%),經(jīng)常收到普法宣傳材料的患者僅占12.14%,認(rèn)為自主學(xué)習(xí)效果一般的患者所占百分比最大(45.00%),患者了解法律法規(guī)知識(shí)的途徑和最喜歡的法制宣傳教育形式中,觀看法制節(jié)目所占比例均為最大(78.57%、75.71%)。(3)兩地患者法律意識(shí)自評(píng)總分的差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(雙側(cè)P值小于0.0001)。法律意識(shí)各維度自評(píng)得分也存在顯著差異(雙側(cè)P值均小于0.05)。(4)多元線性回歸分析結(jié)果顯示,桂林市患者法律意識(shí)水平的影響因素包括年齡(Beta=-0.488, P=0.000)學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣(Beta=0.287, P=0.001)、收到普法宣傳材料的頻率(Beta=0.176, P=0.028)以及月均收入(Beta=0.147, P=0.052)。北京市患者法律意識(shí)水平的影響因素包括學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣(Beta=0.366,P=0.000)、受教育程度(Beta=0.298,P=0.000)以及職業(yè)類別(Beta=0.237, P=0.002)。結(jié)論：桂林市患者總體法律意識(shí)水平偏低,兩地患者法律意識(shí)水平差異顯著；患者對(duì)醫(yī)患相關(guān)法律法規(guī)知識(shí)了解甚少,權(quán)利義務(wù)意識(shí)很高；患者法律服從和運(yùn)用、法律評(píng)價(jià)以及法律心理維度表現(xiàn)較好。患者學(xué)習(xí)法律法規(guī)知識(shí)的主動(dòng)性差,自主學(xué)習(xí)效果不理想,對(duì)法制宣傳教育形式有一定的偏好。年齡與患者法律意識(shí)水平呈負(fù)相關(guān)；學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣、收到普法宣傳材料的頻率、月均收入、受教育程度與患者法律意識(shí)水平呈正相關(guān),對(duì)患者法律意識(shí)水平有積極正面的影響；不同職業(yè)類別的患者法律意識(shí)水平存在差異。因此,需要提高患者學(xué)習(xí)法律法規(guī)知識(shí)的主動(dòng)性；在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展落后的地區(qū),可以探索性開(kāi)展全民衛(wèi)生法制宣傳教育；并重視法制教育有效性和可及性,全面提高患者的法律意識(shí)水平。
[Abstract]:Objective: in the relevant literature on legal consciousness, the theoretical research results are abundant, and the legal consciousness of the related specific people is investigated and analyzed, and the factors affecting the legal consciousness are summarized and summarized. However, there has not been a study of legal consciousness for the group of patients. The lack of the status of the legal consciousness of the patients is lacking. Based on the importance of legal consciousness in value judgment and behavior standard, this study will objectively analyze the status of the patient's legal consciousness and determine the related factors of the patient's legal consciousness, in order to provide a reference for the effective improvement of the level of the patient's legal consciousness. 150 patients were investigated at the A hospital in Guilin and B hospital in Beijing. The descriptive statistics of the survey data were used to objectively reflect the status of the legal consciousness of the patients. The normal test of the related data was done and the following statistical analysis was made according to the results of the normality test: (1) the analysis of two groups of independent sample t tests (parameter tests) two Whether there was a difference in the total score of the self-assessment of the legal consciousness of the patients; (2) the non parametric test of two independent samples (Wilcoxon rank sum test) was used to compare the self-assessment scores of the various dimensions of the legal consciousness of the two places; (3) the multiple linear regression analysis was adopted, and the total score of the legal consciousness was divided into the dependent variable (Y), and the gender, age, and education level were taken. The monthly average income, the occupation category, the learning habit, the frequency of the publicity materials received by the pra (X), established the regression model and screened the related factors of the legal consciousness of the patients. Results: (1) the recovery rate of the two places was 100%, the effective questionnaire of the Guilin city A hospital was 132, the effective rate was 88%, the effective questionnaire of the B hospital in Beijing City In 140 cases, the number of people in each age section of the 93.33%. is relatively balanced, the income level, the ratio of urban and rural, the education level, the occupation distribution and so on. (2) the total score of the legal consciousness of the patients in Guilin is 92.71 + 7.65, the legal knowledge level, the legal rights and obligations consciousness, the law There are few patients (2.27%) who have scored 16.88 + 2.90,19.89 + 2.23,18.71 + 2.35,18.53 + 2.08,18.70 + 2.29. to learn and understand the laws and regulations, respectively, with the score of 16.88 + 2.90,19.89 + + 2.35,18.53 + 2.08,18.70 +. The effect is generally (51.52%). The legal program is the most important way for the patient to understand the legal knowledge (82.82%) and the most favorite way of legal publicity (87.88%). The total score of the self evaluation of the legal consciousness of the patients in Beijing is 97.44 + 7.57, the legal knowledge level, the legal right and duty consciousness, the legal obedience and application, the legal evaluation, the legal psychology and so on 5 dimensions. The percentage of the patients who were divided into 17.74 + 3.29,20.96 + 2.19,19.65 + 2.15,19.39 + 2.08,19.71 + 2.51. less active learning legal knowledge accounted for a larger percentage (32.86%), and only 12.14% of the patients received universal publicity materials. The percentage of patients with the general effect of autonomous learning was the largest (45%), and the patient's knowledge of laws and regulations was in the way. In the form of path and favorite legal publicity and education, the proportion of watching legal programs was the largest (78.57%, 75.71%). (3) the differences in the total score of the self-assessment of legal consciousness of the two patients were statistically significant (bilateral P value was less than 0.0001). There were significant differences in the self-assessment scores of the legal consciousness (both the bilateral P values were less than 0.05). (4) multiple linear regression points. The results showed that the factors affecting the level of legal awareness of the patients in Guilin were Beta=-0.488 (P=0.000) learning habits (Beta=0.287, P=0.001), the frequency of Beta=0.176, P=0.028, and monthly average income (Beta=0.147, P=0.052). The factors affecting the level of legal consciousness of the patients in Beijing include the learning habits (Beta=0). .366, P=0.000), the degree of Education (Beta=0.298, P=0.000) and occupational category (Beta=0.237, P=0.002). Conclusion: the overall legal consciousness level of the patients in Guilin is low, the difference of the legal consciousness of the patients in the two places is significant; the patient's knowledge of the related laws and regulations is very little, the consciousness of the rights and duties is very high; the law of the patient is obedient and applied, law The law evaluation and the legal psychological dimension showed good performance. The initiative of the patient's knowledge of laws and regulations was poor, the effect of self-study was not ideal, and the form of legal publicity and education had a certain preference. The age was negatively related to the level of the legal consciousness of the patients; the learning habits, the frequency of receiving the publicity material of the law, the average monthly income, the education and the patients The level of legal consciousness is positively related and has positive positive influence on the level of legal consciousness of the patients; there are differences in the level of legal consciousness of the patients in different occupational categories. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the initiative of the patients to learn the knowledge of laws and regulations; in the areas behind the backward economic development, the public health legal publicity and education can be carried out; Depending on the effectiveness and accessibility of legal education, we should comprehensively improve the level of legal consciousness of patients.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：R-05;D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韋志明;;桂東南農(nóng)村農(nóng)民法律意識(shí)狀況的社會(huì)調(diào)查研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2007年03期

2 金威;章建人;;土地承包過(guò)程中農(nóng)民法律意識(shí)研究——基于對(duì)江西省500戶農(nóng)民調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2011年13期

3 汪飛;儒家法律思想對(duì)當(dāng)代公民法律意識(shí)的影響[J];安慶師院社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期

4 秦華;任大鵬;;公民法律意識(shí)的量表測(cè)量:一個(gè)基于調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];法學(xué)家;2009年05期

5 孫春偉;董越;;法律意識(shí)在法制教育中的作用分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年10期

6 閻輝;李志遠(yuǎn);馬利霞;;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化對(duì)現(xiàn)代法律意識(shí)的消極影響[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年03期

7 方進(jìn)進(jìn);;大力培養(yǎng)公民法律意識(shí) 加快法治建設(shè)步伐[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年04期

8 楊仁家;社會(huì)主義法律意識(shí)在法制建設(shè)中的作用[J];法學(xué);1983年11期

9 王開(kāi)瓊;;當(dāng)代大學(xué)生法律意識(shí)教育調(diào)查研究[J];黑龍江高教研究;2012年07期

10 楊永紅;;論法律意識(shí)在高校管理工作中的作用[J];科技信息(學(xué)術(shù)研究);2008年15期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 郭曉宇;林農(nóng)法律意識(shí)影響因素分析[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

2 王美君;武漢市大學(xué)生法律意識(shí)調(diào)查報(bào)告[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年

3 才智超;醫(yī)務(wù)人員衛(wèi)生法規(guī)知識(shí)知曉度調(diào)查及分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2074952