發(fā)布時間：2018-06-27 09:31

  本文選題：法律推理 + 法律規(guī)則��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：法律推理是法律邏輯學的一個非常重要的內容,它是法律邏輯學研究的主要對象之一。法律推理是司法實踐中法律適用的一種重要方法。法律就是維護社會秩序的強制性工具,對社會秩序具有重要作用。這要求法律必須穩(wěn)定,不能朝令夕改,法律推理在司法實踐中的運用有利于維護法律的穩(wěn)定,可以減少其他原因對裁判者造成的影響,從而較好的實現法律的確定性。改革開放以來,我國經濟和社會得到快速發(fā)展,人與人、人與社會之間的關系越來越復雜,這對法律推理在司法實踐中的運用提出了更高的要求,學者們熱切關注法律推理的研究。 本文從法律推理的含義、類型和困境談起,著重分析法律規(guī)則和道德評價對法律推理的影響。對于法律推理的定義、特點、類型等基本問題,筆者對目前國內外學者的研究進行了總結和分析,并在此基礎上進行了有意義的探索。此外,本文著重研究法律規(guī)則、道德評價對法律推理過程具有重要的影響,法律推理要對法律規(guī)則與道德評價選擇性適用,法律推理是適用法律規(guī)則和道德評價的結合體。 研究法律規(guī)則與道德評價對法律推理的影響不是一個簡單的課題,而是一項龐大而艱巨的工程,不僅需要研究者具有深厚的法哲學和邏輯學底蘊,而且還需要研究者具有豐富的司法實踐經驗。筆者只是憑著自己有限的能力,試圖研究法律規(guī)則與道德評價對法律推理的影響,以探求一條不脫離法學實際的法律邏輯研究方法。 本文分為五章,第一章主要是法律推理的概述,包括法律推理的含義和特征;第二章是法律推理的困境,包括法律推理的分類及形式法律推理和形式正義的約束,實質法律推理和實踐理性的局限;第三章是講法律規(guī)則,包括法律規(guī)則的含義和類型,按照不同的標準有不同的分類;第四章是講道德評價的含義和類型;第五章是法律規(guī)則與道德評價對法律推理的影響,主要分析法律規(guī)則和道德評價對法律推理過程的影響,法律推理對兩者的選擇性適用,法律推理是適用法律規(guī)則和道德評價的結合體。 本文采用的研究方法有如下幾種: 第一,文獻法。充分利用國內外有關法律規(guī)則、道德評價和法律推理這一主題的相關的文獻資料,把握國內外的研究動態(tài),并在此基礎上對本研究進行資料擴充,擴大研究思路和渠道。 第二,定性分析法。定性分析法就是在總結國內外有關法律推理的研究資料基礎上,對法律推理的概念、分類,及法律規(guī)則與道德評價對法律推理的影響透過表面,進行“質”的分析。在具體研究分析時運用歸納和演繹的方法、分析與綜合的方法以及抽象與概括等方法,對獲得的各種材料進行思維加工,去粗取精、去偽存真、由此及彼、由表及里,達到認識事物本質、揭示內在規(guī)律的目的。 第三,功能分析法。功能分析法是法學等社會科學用來分析社會現象的一種重要方法。
[Abstract]:Legal reasoning is a very important content of legal logic, and it is one of the main objects of legal logic. Legal reasoning is an important method of legal application in judicial practice. Law is a compulsory tool to maintain social order and plays an important role in social order. This requires that the law must be stable, can not be changed, the use of legal reasoning in judicial practice is conducive to maintaining the stability of the law, can reduce the impact of other reasons on the referee, so as to achieve legal certainty. Since the reform and opening up, China's economy and society have developed rapidly, and the relationship between people and society has become more and more complicated, which puts forward higher requirements for the application of legal reasoning in judicial practice. Scholars pay keen attention to the study of legal reasoning. This paper discusses the meaning, types and difficulties of legal reasoning, and analyzes the influence of legal rules and moral evaluation on legal reasoning. For the definition, characteristics, types and other basic problems of legal reasoning, the author summarized and analyzed the current research of scholars at home and abroad, and on this basis carried on a meaningful exploration. In addition, this paper focuses on the study of legal rules, moral evaluation has an important impact on the process of legal reasoning, legal reasoning should be applied selectively to legal rules and moral evaluation, legal reasoning is the combination of applicable legal rules and moral evaluation. To study the influence of legal rules and moral evaluation on legal reasoning is not a simple subject, but a huge and arduous project. Moreover, it is necessary for researchers to have rich experience in judicial practice. The author, with his limited ability, tries to study the influence of legal rules and moral evaluation on legal reasoning in order to explore a method of legal logic research which does not deviate from the practice of law. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an overview of legal reasoning, including the meaning and characteristics of legal reasoning, the second chapter is the dilemma of legal reasoning, including the classification of legal reasoning and formal justice constraints. The third chapter is about legal rules, including the meaning and types of legal rules, which are classified according to different standards, and the fourth chapter is about the meaning and types of moral evaluation. The fifth chapter is the influence of legal rules and moral evaluation on legal reasoning, mainly analyzes the influence of legal rules and moral evaluation on the process of legal reasoning, and the selective application of legal reasoning to both. Legal reasoning is the combination of applying legal rules and moral evaluation. The research methods used in this paper are as follows: first, literature method. This paper makes full use of the relevant literature on the subject of legal rules, moral evaluation and legal reasoning at home and abroad to grasp the research trends at home and abroad, and on this basis, expands the research ideas and channels. Second, qualitative analysis. On the basis of summarizing the research data of legal reasoning at home and abroad, the qualitative analysis method is to analyze the concept, classification, and the influence of legal rules and moral evaluation on legal reasoning through the surface. In the specific research and analysis, the methods of induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, abstract and generalization, etc., are used to process the various materials obtained, to get rid of the rough and refined, to distinguish the false things, to retain the real things, from the outside to the inside, To realize the essence of things and reveal the internal laws. Third, functional analysis. Functional analysis is an important method used by social sciences such as law to analyze social phenomena.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90-05

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張傳新,司獻英;法律推理過程的形式分析[J];當代法學;2003年07期

2 王鴻貌;論當代西方法學中的法律推理[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1995年05期

3 沈宗靈;法律推理與法律適用[J];法學;1988年05期

4 阮松;西方的非形式邏輯運動與我國邏輯學的走向[J];南開學報;1996年06期

5 戴維·凱爾瑞斯;王晨光;;法律推論[J];中外法學;1990年02期

6 雍琦;關于法律邏輯性質及走向的思考[J];現代法學;1997年05期

7 德全英,解興權;法律推理論綱[J];新疆大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1998年03期

8 張保生;法律推理活動和學說的歷史考察[J];煙臺大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年02期

9 王德玲,田秀娟;法律推理確定性與不確定性芻議[J];政法論叢;2000年02期

10 陳景輝;;規(guī)則、道德衡量與法律推理[J];中國法學;2008年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 張傳新;論法律推理[D];河南大學;2001年

2 賈秀琴;法律實踐的論證方法—法律推理[D];華南師范大學;2002年

，

本文編號：2073469