本文選題：早期中立評價 + 訴前調(diào)解��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：近幾年,隨著大眾法律意識的提高、權(quán)利意識的增強,我國逐漸進(jìn)入了“訴訟高發(fā)期”。自2009年始,全國法院積極推進(jìn)訴前調(diào)解,探索訴前糾紛解決的新途徑,但由于各種因素的制約,訴前調(diào)解并不能像美國的替代性糾紛解決機制ADR(alternative dispute resolution)那般靈活有效。本文將結(jié)合筆者在法院從事訴前調(diào)解的實際工作經(jīng)驗,分析我國目前訴調(diào)機制存在的主要缺陷。筆者認(rèn)為,要使訴前調(diào)解獲得更高的效益、更好的社會效果,應(yīng)當(dāng)引入美國ADR中比較適宜我國法院現(xiàn)狀的機制。本文以美國ADR的早期中立評估ENE(early neutral evaluation)作為切入點,介紹該機制的主要內(nèi)容、特點、弊端、可移植性,針對我國訴前調(diào)解不盡人意的實際狀況,為現(xiàn)有條件下的中國的訴前調(diào)解構(gòu)建早期中立評估機制的基本框架。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the improvement of public legal consciousness and the enhancement of the awareness of rights, China has gradually entered a period of "high incidence of litigation". Since 2009, the national court has actively promoted pre litigation mediation to explore new ways to resolve disputes before litigation. However, due to various factors, the pre lawsuit mediation can not be like the alternative dispute settlement mechanism ADR (alterna Tive dispute resolution) is so flexible and effective. This article will combine the actual working experience of the author's mediation before the court, and analyze the main defects in our current mechanism of mediation. The author thinks that it should be more suitable for the present situation of our court to make the pre lawsuit mediation more effective and better social effect. Based on the early neutrality assessment of ENE (early neutral evaluation) of American ADR as a breakthrough point, this paper introduces the main contents, characteristics, malpractices, portability of the mechanism, and the basic framework for the establishment of an early neutral assessment mechanism for China's pre lawsuit mediation under the existing conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;DD915

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 劉艷芳;;我國古代調(diào)解制度解析[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年02期

2 蔡從燕;美國民事司法改革架構(gòu)中的ADR[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

3 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會責(zé)任 從司法社會化到司法能動主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

4 邵軍;從ADR反思我國的民事調(diào)解現(xiàn)狀[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

5 王福華;;論訴前強制調(diào)解[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張雅婷;訴前調(diào)解機制探析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2070716