發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-25 07:26

  本文選題：商標(biāo) + 商標(biāo)搶注　； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：商標(biāo)不僅具有識(shí)別商品來(lái)源的作用,對(duì)于經(jīng)營(yíng)者來(lái)說(shuō),商標(biāo)更是一筆無(wú)形的資產(chǎn),一筆寶貴的財(cái)富。正因?yàn)樯虡?biāo)蘊(yùn)含著巨大價(jià)值,些基于不正當(dāng)目的的搶注者企圖通過(guò)商標(biāo)搶注行為來(lái)牟取巨額利益�，F(xiàn)在商標(biāo)搶注行為不僅僅在中國(guó),在世界各個(gè)國(guó)家都呈現(xiàn)出了多樣化、復(fù)雜化的趨勢(shì),成為各國(guó)商標(biāo)保護(hù)所面臨的嚴(yán)峻問(wèn)題之一 本文選擇中國(guó)和日本作為對(duì)象,對(duì)中日兩國(guó)的“防止商標(biāo)搶注法律制度”進(jìn)行比較研究。因?yàn)橹腥諆蓢?guó)既是《巴黎公約》的成員國(guó),又是世界貿(mào)易組織的成員,都按照《巴黎公約》和TRIPS協(xié)議的要求提供對(duì)商標(biāo)的相關(guān)保護(hù),所以兩國(guó)在商標(biāo)保護(hù)的有關(guān)規(guī)定上相對(duì)來(lái)說(shuō)比較接近。另一方面,日本的《商標(biāo)法》和《不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)防止法》的實(shí)施都早于中國(guó),并且為了靈活應(yīng)對(duì)科技、經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)的巨大變化,有效解決不斷出現(xiàn)的新問(wèn)題,日本一直頻繁地修改其商標(biāo)相關(guān)法律。通過(guò)比較可以學(xué)習(xí)借鑒日本的一些有價(jià)值的理論,有助于中國(guó)更好地完善防止商標(biāo)搶注的法律制度。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分。 第一部分“關(guān)于商標(biāo)搶注的基本問(wèn)題”。本文首先對(duì)商標(biāo)的概念、商標(biāo)的作用、商標(biāo)搶注的概念、商標(biāo)搶注的類型進(jìn)行梳理。因?yàn)樯虡?biāo)具有重要作用,商標(biāo)所有人才會(huì)付出巨大努力不斷積累并提高商標(biāo)信譽(yù)；同時(shí)商標(biāo)搶注人正是看到了商標(biāo)對(duì)于其所有人的巨大價(jià)值,才會(huì)通過(guò)搶注的行為以達(dá)到快速牟取不正當(dāng)利益的目的。所以為了更好地保護(hù)商標(biāo)所有人、保護(hù)消費(fèi)者的合法權(quán)益,有必要不斷完善我國(guó)防止商標(biāo)搶注行為的法律制度。通過(guò)第一部分的梳理也闡明了本文創(chuàng)作的主要目的。 第二部分“中日商標(biāo)審查評(píng)審流程中防止商標(biāo)搶注制度的比較分析”。本文將“商標(biāo)審查評(píng)審流程”單獨(dú)列為一個(gè)部分進(jìn)行中日兩國(guó)防止商標(biāo)搶注法律制度的比較研究,是想更深入地介紹和分析日本在這方面的一些獨(dú)特的法律制度。首先,分析了中國(guó)商標(biāo)審查評(píng)審流程中防止商標(biāo)搶注的制度；然后介紹分析了日本的相關(guān)制度,特別是日本獨(dú)具特色的制度；最后,針對(duì)中日兩國(guó)商標(biāo)審查評(píng)審流程中具有共性的制度、各自擁有特點(diǎn)的制度分別進(jìn)行了比較分析。 第三部分“中日防止商標(biāo)搶注其他法律規(guī)定的比較分析”。首先,以中日《商標(biāo)法》中防止商標(biāo)搶注的有關(guān)規(guī)定為對(duì)象進(jìn)行分析；然后,對(duì)中日《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》中防止商標(biāo)搶注的規(guī)定進(jìn)行比較分析。 第四部分“完善我國(guó)防止商標(biāo)搶注相關(guān)法律制度的思考”。在前述比較研究的基礎(chǔ)上,本文針對(duì)“我國(guó)商標(biāo)審查評(píng)審流程中防止商標(biāo)搶注的有關(guān)制度”、“《商標(biāo)法》中防止商標(biāo)搶注的其他相關(guān)規(guī)定”以及“《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》的有關(guān)規(guī)定”提出了一些具體的完善建議。 本文在創(chuàng)作過(guò)程中收集了大量關(guān)于日本商標(biāo)審查評(píng)審流程以及日本商標(biāo)法律相關(guān)規(guī)定的資料,介紹了一些日本防止商標(biāo)搶注的具有特色的法律制度。通過(guò)比較研究,希望能夠?qū)ν晟浦袊?guó)防止商標(biāo)搶注的相關(guān)法律制度起到一定的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:The trademark not only has the function of identifying the source of the commodity, but for the operator, the trademark is more an intangible asset and a valuable wealth. It is because the trademark contains great value, and some unjustified preempters attempt to make a huge profit through the act of trademark snatch. All countries in the world have shown the trend of diversification and complexity, and become one of the serious problems facing trademark protection in various countries.
In this paper, China and Japan are selected as the object of the comparative study of the "legal system for preventing trademark snatch" between China and Japan. Since China and Japan are members of the Paris Convention and members of the world trade organization, they all protect the trademark in accordance with the requirements of the "Paris Convention" and the TRIPS agreement, so the two countries are in the trademark protection. The relevant provisions of protection are relatively close. On the other hand, the implementation of the trademark law and the Unfair Competition Prevention Law in Japan is earlier than that of China, and in order to cope with the great changes in science and technology, economy and society, and effectively solve the emerging problems, Japan has been constantly revising its trademark related laws. Learning from Japan's valuable theories will help China better improve the legal system to prevent trademark rush registration.
This article is divided into four parts.
The first part is about the basic problems of trademark snatch. Firstly, the concept of trademark, the role of trademark, the concept of trademark snatch, the type of trademark snatch are combed. Because the trademark has an important role, the trademark owners will make great efforts to accumulate and improve the reputation of the trademark; at the same time, the trademark snatch people are seeing it. In order to protect the owner of the trademark and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the consumers, it is necessary to improve the legal system of our country to prevent the trademark snatch in order to better protect the trademark owners and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the consumers. The main purpose of creation.
The second part is "the comparative analysis of the system of preventing trademark registration in the process of Trademark Review and review in China and Japan". This paper makes a comparative study of the "trademark review and review process" as a part of the legal system of preventing trademark snatch from China and Japan. It is intended to introduce and analyze some unique legal systems in Japan in a more in-depth way. First, it analyzes the system of preventing trademark registration in China's trademark review and review process, and then introduces and analyzes the related system in Japan, especially the unique system in Japan. Finally, the system which has common characteristics in the process of Trademark Review and evaluation in China and Japan is compared and analyzed respectively.
The third part is "the comparative analysis of other legal provisions on preventing trademark snatch by China and Japan". First, the article analyzes the relevant provisions of the Sino Japanese trademark law to prevent trademark snatch from the trademark, and then makes a comparative analysis on the provisions of the anti unfair competition law in China and Japan for preventing trademark snatch.
In the fourth part, "perfecting our country's legal system for preventing trademark registration". On the basis of the previous comparative study, this article aims at "relevant regulations on preventing trademark registration in the process of Trademark Review and appraisal in our country", "other relevant regulations on preventing trademark snatch in the Trademark Law" and the relevant regulations of "Anti Unfair Competition Law". Some concrete suggestions are put forward.
In the process of creation, this article collected a great deal of information about the review process of the Japanese Trademark Review and the relevant regulations of the Japanese trademark law, and introduced some characteristic legal systems in Japan to prevent the trademark snatch from the trademark. Through comparative study, it is hoped that it can be used as a reference for the improvement of the relevant legal system of China's prevention of trademark snatch. Effect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D931.3;D922.294;D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郝玉強(qiáng),姚坤;日本商標(biāo)法律制度概況(上)[J];中華商標(biāo);2001年06期

2 郝玉強(qiáng),姚坤;日本商標(biāo)法律制度概況(下)[J];中華商標(biāo);2001年07期

3 馮曉青;;商標(biāo)法第三次修改若干問(wèn)題[J];中華商標(biāo);2007年04期

4 劉國(guó)棟;;2005年來(lái)日本商標(biāo)法的新動(dòng)向[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年05期

5 森智香子;;中日商標(biāo)申請(qǐng)注冊(cè)制度比較[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年12期

6 程曉梅;;日本特許廳商標(biāo)審判概覽[J];中華商標(biāo);2011年01期

7 王春燕;商標(biāo)保護(hù)法律框架的比較研究[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年04期

8 李揚(yáng);;注冊(cè)商標(biāo)不使用撤銷制度中的“商標(biāo)使用”界定——中國(guó)與日本相關(guān)立法、司法之比較[J];法學(xué);2009年10期

9 尹佳妮;;美日商標(biāo)制度比較及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年34期

10 黃文輝;;日本特許廳的商標(biāo)機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置和商標(biāo)審查官培訓(xùn)制度[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2007年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 北京市第一中級(jí)人民法院 李茜;[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 金YТ，

本文編號(hào)：2065137