本文選題：我國(guó)古代 + 國(guó)家土地所有權(quán)��； 參考：《長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文的寫作目的在于以歷史順序考察我國(guó)古代土地所有權(quán)思想的基本內(nèi)容之上,探索出我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化中土地所有權(quán)思想的變遷規(guī)律,找到我國(guó)土地所有權(quán)制度可“依賴的歷史路徑”,總結(jié)各種所有權(quán)制度成功的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和失敗的教訓(xùn),以期為我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地權(quán)利制度的重構(gòu)提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)和借鑒。 在綜合運(yùn)用歷史分析、多元化和古今結(jié)合的研究方法基礎(chǔ)上,本文從一種新穎的視角切入,為我國(guó)當(dāng)前農(nóng)村土地權(quán)利制度的改革提出以下創(chuàng)新性建議：一是要在現(xiàn)有農(nóng)村土地集體所有的框架內(nèi),協(xié)調(diào)好國(guó)家、集體和農(nóng)民三方的關(guān)系,改變現(xiàn)有國(guó)家力量畸強(qiáng),而集體和農(nóng)民力量畸弱的局面,應(yīng)賦予農(nóng)民更多的權(quán)利。二是要推進(jìn)土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的物權(quán)化,使土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的權(quán)能法定化；同時(shí)要加強(qiáng)土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)自由的建設(shè),使市場(chǎng)在農(nóng)地資源配置中發(fā)揮主導(dǎo)作用。 本文第一部分和第二部分以歷史年代為主線,考察了我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化中土地所有權(quán)思想的變遷歷程。從縱向來看,并非單純采用按朝代的歷史分期法,而是以國(guó)家土地所有權(quán)與私有土地所有權(quán)“誰戰(zhàn)誰勝”為根據(jù),將我國(guó)歷史劃分為四個(gè)階段：夏商周——春秋,戰(zhàn)國(guó)——秦漢,魏晉南北朝——中唐,唐中后期——明清。歷史分期本身并非重點(diǎn),目的在于以這種方法更好地呈現(xiàn)國(guó)家土地所有權(quán)與私有土地所有權(quán)在這四個(gè)階段的演化和發(fā)展。第三部分是對(duì)前兩章內(nèi)容進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)出我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化中土地所有權(quán)思想的演變規(guī)律。作為歷史研究的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,第四部分研究了我國(guó)現(xiàn)有農(nóng)村土地權(quán)利的現(xiàn)狀,以及歷史與現(xiàn)行制度之間的繼承,并進(jìn)一步地提出了改革我國(guó)現(xiàn)行農(nóng)村土地權(quán)利制度的可行性方案。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to investigate the basic content of the ancient land ownership thought in the historical order, and to explore the law of the change of the land ownership thought in the traditional legal culture of our country. To find out the historical path on which the land ownership system of our country can depend, and to sum up the successful experiences and lessons of the various ownership systems in order to provide experience and reference for the reconstruction of the rural land rights system in our country. On the basis of the comprehensive application of historical analysis, pluralism and the combination of ancient and modern research methods, this paper starts with a novel perspective. This paper puts forward the following innovative suggestions for the reform of the current system of rural land rights in China: first, it is necessary to coordinate the relationship between the state, the collective and the peasants within the framework of collective ownership of the existing rural land, and to change the existing national strength. The situation that collective and peasant forces are extremely weak should give peasants more rights. Second, it is necessary to promote the real right of land contract management right and legalize the power of land contract management right; at the same time, it is necessary to strengthen the free construction of land contract management right, so that the market can play a leading role in the allocation of agricultural land resources. The first part and the second part of this paper take the historical age as the main line, has inspected the change course of the land ownership thought in the traditional legal culture of our country. From the vertical point of view, the history of our country is divided into four stages: Xia, Shang, Zhou, Spring and Autumn, based on the national land ownership and private land ownership, which are divided into four stages: Xia, Shang Zhou, Spring and Autumn period. Warring States-Qin-Han, Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties-mid-Tang, Tang, late-Ming-Qing Dynasty. Historical staging itself is not the focus, the purpose of this method is to better present the evolution and development of national land ownership and private land ownership in these four stages. The third part summarizes the law of the evolution of the thought of land ownership in the traditional legal culture of our country on the basis of systematically combing the contents of the first two chapters. As the practical significance of the historical research, the fourth part studies the present situation of the rural land rights in our country, and the inheritance between the history and the current system, and further puts forward the feasible plan of reforming the current rural land rights system of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.3;D923.2;D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張傳璽;論中國(guó)封建社會(huì)土地所有權(quán)的法律觀念[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1980年06期

2 賈春澤;;中國(guó)古代土地制度淺析[J];滄桑;2005年06期

3 顧華詳;;論我國(guó)古代土地所有權(quán)保護(hù)制度的特征[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

4 王旭偉;;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)土地物權(quán)制度的解讀[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

5 侯外廬;;中國(guó)封建社會(huì)土地所有制形式的問題——中國(guó)封建社會(huì)發(fā)展規(guī)律商兌之一[J];歷史研究;1954年01期

6 陳鋒;;中國(guó)古代的土地制度與田賦征收[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

7 陳u&;土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)物權(quán)化與農(nóng)地使用權(quán)制度的確立[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1996年03期

8 王小映;土地制度變遷與土地承包權(quán)物權(quán)化[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年01期

9 秦暉;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)史上的怪圈：“抑兼并”與“不抑兼并”[J];戰(zhàn)略與管理;1997年04期

10 魏天安,葛金芳;中國(guó)古代土地制度的發(fā)展特點(diǎn)和趨勢(shì)[J];中州學(xué)刊;1990年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2027026