本文選題：馬克思主義法學(xué) + 法學(xué)研究方法��； 參考：《渤海大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：馬克思主義法學(xué)從誕生至今已有一百多年的歷史。馬克思主義法學(xué)是馬克思主義理論的重要組成部分，，它起源于馬克思、恩格斯等人對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、社會(huì)等方面的認(rèn)識(shí)，從歷史唯物主義的角度詮釋了“法”的本質(zhì)和作用。馬克思主義法學(xué)研究方法對(duì)于后來(lái)的社會(huì)主義革命與建設(shè)的實(shí)踐有著極其重要的指導(dǎo)意義。我國(guó)社會(huì)主義建設(shè)的歷程上也離不開馬克思主義法學(xué)的研究方法，但是自從改革開放起，傳統(tǒng)的馬克思主義法學(xué)逐漸沒(méi)落，法學(xué)研究陷入了功利主義和實(shí)用主義的極端，以詮釋法條為核心的“詮釋學(xué)派”占據(jù)了法學(xué)研究的中心。但這種孤立化的研究必然引起法學(xué)領(lǐng)域的形而上學(xué)，我國(guó)法學(xué)的研究脫離了其它學(xué)科的有力支撐，其理論始終薄弱，法務(wù)實(shí)踐也在飛速發(fā)展的社會(huì)狀況面前亦步亦趨，而相關(guān)的司法制度也因?yàn)槿狈υ醋陨鐣?huì)學(xué)和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的指導(dǎo)而難以實(shí)現(xiàn)自我突破。因此，以研究社會(huì)科學(xué)為特征的“社科學(xué)派”在20世紀(jì)90年代橫空出世。這種研究方法不但摒除了“詮釋學(xué)派”的種種弊端，并且其核心方法論與傳統(tǒng)馬克思主義法學(xué)研究方法是一致的，是建立在馬克思主義法學(xué)理論基礎(chǔ)之上的創(chuàng)新與發(fā)展。然而目前的法學(xué)界和馬克思主義理論學(xué)界都沒(méi)有充分意識(shí)到這二者之間的聯(lián)系，傳統(tǒng)馬克思主義法學(xué)依然在“沒(méi)落”，“社科學(xué)派”則日漸昌盛，成為了未來(lái)我國(guó)法學(xué)研究可以預(yù)期的重心。 本文首先分析了“社科學(xué)派”產(chǎn)生的原因是因?yàn)槟壳拔覈?guó)法學(xué)研究出現(xiàn)了一些難以突破的困境，而“社科學(xué)派”的特征決定了它是破解這些困境的有力武器。接著本文將“社科學(xué)派”與傳統(tǒng)馬克思主義法學(xué)研究方法進(jìn)行了具體方法論和理論內(nèi)容方面的對(duì)比，提煉出“社科學(xué)派”對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)馬克思主義法學(xué)研究方法的繼承、發(fā)展與改革之處。最后，本文將“社科學(xué)派”的前景進(jìn)行了展望，期待著馬克思主義法學(xué)能夠在“社科學(xué)派”的促進(jìn)下重新獲得現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Marxist law has a history of more than one hundred years since it was born. Marxist jurisprudence is an important part of Marxist theory. It originates from Marx and Engels' understanding of economy, politics, society and so on. It explains the essence and function of Law from the angle of historical materialism. The research method of Marxist law has very important guiding significance for the practice of socialist revolution and construction. The course of socialist construction in our country is also inseparable from the research methods of Marxist jurisprudence. However, since the reform and opening up, the traditional Marxist jurisprudence has gradually declined, and the legal research has fallen into the extreme of utilitarianism and pragmatism. The hermeneutical school, which is centered on the interpretation of the law, occupies the center of the study of law. However, this kind of isolated research will inevitably lead to metaphysics in the field of law. The study of law in our country is divorced from the strong support of other disciplines, its theory is always weak, and the practice of legal affairs is also following the trend in the face of the rapid development of social conditions. The relevant judicial system is also difficult to achieve self-breakthrough because of the lack of guidance from sociology and economics. Therefore, the social science school characterized by the study of social sciences was born in the 1990 s. This research method not only eliminates all kinds of defects of the "hermeneutical school", but also its core methodology is consistent with the traditional Marxist legal research method, and it is an innovation and development based on the Marxist jurisprudence theory. However, at present, neither the legal circles nor the Marxist theoretical circles have fully realized the connection between the two. The traditional Marxist jurisprudence is still "declining", while the "social science school" is flourishing day by day. Has become our country law research can anticipate the center of gravity in the future. This paper first analyzes the causes of the "Social Science School" because there are some difficult difficulties in our country's legal research at present, and the characteristics of the "Social Science School" determine that it is a powerful weapon to solve these dilemmas. Then, this paper compares the "social science school" with the traditional Marxist law research method in terms of specific methodology and theoretical content, and abstracts the inheritance of the "social science school" to the traditional Marxist law research method. Development and reform Finally, this paper looks forward to the prospect of "social science school" and expects Marxist jurisprudence to regain its practical value under the promotion of "social science school".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李勤;;淺析儒家思想對(duì)古代未成年人刑事司法制度的影響[J];北京青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

2 張凱;;淺談馬克思的國(guó)家理論[J];才智;2010年14期

3 徐慧娟;;古典自然法哲學(xué)思想與近代西方憲政的關(guān)系[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

4 葛洪義;法理學(xué)的定義與意義[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

5 彭健;;建國(guó)以來(lái)我黨對(duì)社會(huì)主義民主法制認(rèn)識(shí)的歷史演進(jìn)[J];黨史博采(理論);2010年10期

6 張燁;;社會(huì)正義的探究維度——法哲學(xué)[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年01期

7 玉梅;;法律語(yǔ)言的法哲學(xué)思考[J];廣西民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

8 付子堂;;中國(guó)馬克思主義法學(xué)理論的新拓展——研究動(dòng)態(tài)與問(wèn)題意識(shí)[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

9 蔡偉;李其瑞;;經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和哲學(xué):馬克思主義法學(xué)的三個(gè)方法論貢獻(xiàn)[J];江海學(xué)刊;2007年01期

10 王云飛;豐霏;陳連志;;馬克思恩格斯法學(xué)理論內(nèi)核剖析[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉悅;馬克思主義法學(xué)方法論及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2003年

2 王孝強(qiáng);行政立法與現(xiàn)代法治[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

3 杜建明;論法學(xué)研究中的階級(jí)分析方法[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2023151