本文選題：俄羅斯 + 社會轉(zhuǎn)型��； 參考：《安徽大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：法治在當代社會成為一種全球性的主導話語。俄羅斯在經(jīng)歷社會轉(zhuǎn)型走向世界的同時,不可避免地要融入到這一話語之中。俄羅斯的社會轉(zhuǎn)型是漫長的,同時也將是一個相當復雜的過程。法治國家作為不容拒絕的世界性潮流,是其轉(zhuǎn)型期內(nèi)應有的訴求。但俄羅斯特殊的發(fā)展歷史將使其在法治之路上艱難前行。俄羅斯的法治之路應如何走下去卻是個有待深入探討的問題。筆者從俄羅斯的法治國家建設(shè)的基礎(chǔ)、進程和特征入手,結(jié)合其特有的文化傳統(tǒng)及現(xiàn)實挑戰(zhàn),對俄羅斯法治的構(gòu)建與發(fā)展之路稍做探索。全文共分為四個部分： 第一部分主要闡述轉(zhuǎn)型時期俄羅斯法治構(gòu)建與發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)。筆者主要從理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)兩方面介紹。理論基礎(chǔ)主要介紹俄羅斯歷史上對法治國家理論的認識及其曲折發(fā)展過程；現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)從經(jīng)濟條件、制度條件、文化條件和社會條件來論述當前俄羅斯法治構(gòu)建與發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)具備與否。 第二部分主要介紹進入社會轉(zhuǎn)型期以來俄羅斯法治發(fā)展的歷史進程。從葉利欽時期的混亂到普京的新政,一直到現(xiàn)在的梅普組合新形勢,俄羅斯的法治從機械構(gòu)建逐漸走向穩(wěn)步發(fā)展。 第三部分著重分析了轉(zhuǎn)型時期俄羅斯法治發(fā)展的特征。首先在俄羅斯法治構(gòu)建過程中,俄羅斯的傳統(tǒng)文化與西方的法治文明相沖突,這正是制約俄羅斯法治發(fā)展的重要原因。其次,俄羅斯中央與地方關(guān)系的動蕩變化,是其法治國家發(fā)展不夠穩(wěn)定的重要因素。第三,文章分析了俄羅斯的政府推進型法治發(fā)展模式帶來的利與弊。 第四部分主要對中國的法治建設(shè)略作建議。首先中國的法治建設(shè)必須堅持社會主義道路,理清法治與社會主義之間的關(guān)系；其次,中國的法治建設(shè)要注重本土資源的利用,要吸取俄羅斯一味照搬西方模式的教訓。再次,通過與俄羅斯處理中央與地方關(guān)系的比較,對中國如何正確處理中央地方關(guān)系提出了幾點建議。最后,在俄羅斯的經(jīng)驗之下,中國的政府推進型法治模式應向混合型逐漸發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The rule of law has become a global dominant discourse in the contemporary society. Russia is inevitably involved in this discourse while experiencing social transformation to the world. Russia's social transformation is a long, but also a rather complicated process. The rule of law is a world trend that can not be refused. The special development history of Russia will make it difficult to move forward on the road of rule of law. It is a problem to go on how the road of the rule of law of Russia should go on. The author starts with the foundation, process and characteristics of the construction of the rule of law in Russia, and combines its unique cultural tradition and realistic challenges to Russia. Ross's exploration of the construction and development of the rule of law is divided into four parts.
The first part mainly expounds the foundation of the construction and development of the rule of law in Russia during the transition period. The author mainly introduces the two aspects of the theoretical basis and the realistic basis. The theoretical basis mainly introduces the understanding of the theory of the rule of law in Russian history and the process of its tortuous development; the realistic basis is from the economic conditions, the institutional conditions, the cultural conditions and the social bar. To discuss the foundation of the construction and development of the rule of law in Russia at present.
The second part mainly introduces the historical process of the development of the rule of law in Russia since the period of social transformation. From the confusion of Yeltsin to Putin's new deal, the new situation of the combination of the MEP combination in the present period, the rule of law in Russia has gradually developed from the construction of machinery.
The third part focuses on the analysis of the characteristics of the development of the rule of law in Russia during the transition period. In the process of building the Russian rule of law, the Russian traditional culture conflicts with the rule of law civilization in the West. This is the important reason that restricts the development of the rule of law in Russia. Secondly, the turbulent changes in the relations between the Russian Central and the local are the development of the rule of law. Third, the article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of Russia's government promoting rule of law development model.
The fourth part mainly makes some suggestions on the construction of the rule of law in China. First of all, the construction of the rule of law in China must adhere to the socialist road and clarify the relationship between the rule of law and socialism. Secondly, the construction of the rule of law in China should pay attention to the use of local resources and absorb the lessons from the Russian model. In comparison with the relationship between the central and the local, some suggestions on how to deal with the central and local relations in China are put forward. In the end, under the Russian experience, the Chinese government propelled rule of law mode should be gradually developed into a mixed type.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D951.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 張俊杰;俄羅斯法治國家思想歷史初析[J];求是學刊;2004年04期

2 陸南泉;;普京執(zhí)政的前四年與后四年[J];上海財經(jīng)大學學報;2006年01期

3 張貫益;葉利欽時期俄羅斯的社會轉(zhuǎn)型[J];社會主義研究;2000年06期

4 徐臻;;轉(zhuǎn)型時期的俄羅斯總統(tǒng)選舉[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治論壇;2008年01期

5 謝暉;;全球化、社會轉(zhuǎn)型和中國法制模式的選擇[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2007年01期

6 鄭言;梁磊;;中央與地方關(guān)系:中國、俄羅斯之比較研究[J];新視野;2006年03期

7 鄭淑娟;;和諧社會法治建設(shè)的基石:法治本土資源借鑒[J];西安建筑科技大學學報(社會科學版);2008年02期

8 張明明;;法治中國的模式選擇及其原因[J];玉溪師范學院學報;2009年01期

9 郭學德;試論中國的“政府推進型”法治道路及其實踐中存在的問題[J];鄭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年01期

，

本文編號：2019598