發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-08 18:43

  本文選題：中國法學(xué)研究 + 法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)��； 參考：《法商研究》2014年05期

【摘要】：正[編者按]近十幾年來,中國法學(xué)研究不同進(jìn)路之間的分化理路逐漸清晰,其中倡導(dǎo)面向中國社會(huì)實(shí)際、通過運(yùn)用社會(huì)科學(xué)方法研究法律現(xiàn)象和法治問題的社科法學(xué)研究日漸興起,這方面的研究成果越來越豐富。不過,縱觀已有的關(guān)于社科法學(xué)的研究成果不難發(fā)現(xiàn),學(xué)者們多集中于研究方法、實(shí)踐案例等具體問題的論述,而不注重社科法學(xué)一般性問題的討論。例如,當(dāng)法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析、法社會(huì)學(xué)研究、法人類學(xué)路徑等都被囊括在社科法學(xué)"旗下"的時(shí)候,社科法學(xué)的內(nèi)涵和邊界究竟在哪里?社科法學(xué)究竟是一種什么樣
[Abstract]:In the past decade or so, the differentiation between different approaches in Chinese legal research has gradually become clear, in which it is advocated to face the reality of Chinese society. Through the use of social science methods to study legal phenomena and the rule of law, the study of social science law is on the rise, and the research results in this field are more and more abundant. However, it is not difficult to find that scholars focus on the discussion of specific problems such as research methods, practical cases and so on, rather than the discussion of general problems of social science law. For example, when the analysis of law and economics, the study of sociology of law and the path of legal anthropology are all included in the "subordinate" of social science law, where is the connotation and boundary of social science law? What is Social Science Law really like
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉愛龍;;憲政中國及其當(dāng)下法學(xué)任務(wù)——基于歷史考察的視角[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1996808