本文選題：美國(guó)民事訴訟法 + 既判力��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則與請(qǐng)求排除規(guī)則共同構(gòu)成了美國(guó)的判決效理論。美國(guó)的爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則起源于古日耳曼的禁反言原則，后來傳入英國(guó)，再由英國(guó)的殖民者帶入美國(guó)，并伴隨著美國(guó)獨(dú)立戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的勝利以及法律制度的建立和完善，在美國(guó)確立和發(fā)展。爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則，是指如果一個(gè)爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)在訴訟中由雙方當(dāng)事人進(jìn)行了充分的爭(zhēng)訟，法院對(duì)該爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)作出了判定，且該爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)對(duì)于前訴判決的作出來說是必要的，那么雙方當(dāng)事人在后訴中就不能就該爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)重復(fù)的進(jìn)行爭(zhēng)訟。在關(guān)于美國(guó)民事訴訟法的判決效的有關(guān)規(guī)則中，爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則作為美國(guó)民事訴訟中的核心規(guī)則被廣泛而靈活的適用，其在避免矛盾判決、提高訴訟效率、減少訴訟資源的浪費(fèi)以及維護(hù)司法的穩(wěn)定性方面發(fā)揮著積極的作用。本文通過對(duì)美國(guó)的爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則的內(nèi)涵、歷史演變過程和對(duì)其他國(guó)家地區(qū)的影響以及在美國(guó)的運(yùn)行狀況的研究，同時(shí)結(jié)合我國(guó)既判力理論體系發(fā)展情況，分析我國(guó)引入爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則的必要性、可行性以及存在的障礙，認(rèn)為，，想要在短時(shí)間內(nèi)在我國(guó)建立爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則是困難的同時(shí)也是不現(xiàn)實(shí)的。理性的做法是，通過進(jìn)一步研究美國(guó)的爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則以及相關(guān)規(guī)則制度來更全面的了解爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則的理論知識(shí)，并逐漸在我國(guó)司法工作者中樹立爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則的理念，嚴(yán)格并詳細(xì)規(guī)定爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則在我國(guó)運(yùn)行的適用要件、例外情況以及特殊適用情況，并輔以相應(yīng)的程序保障，以此來實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)建立爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)排除規(guī)則的目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:The rule of dispute exclusion and the rule of request exclusion constitute the judgment effect theory of the United States. The American rule of exclusion originated from the principle of estoppel in ancient Germany.After it was introduced to England and brought into the United States by British colonists, it was accompanied by the victory of the American War of Independence and the establishment and perfection of the legal system. Established and developed in the United States. The rule of exclusion of points of contention means that if a point of contention is sufficiently contested by both parties in the proceedings, the court has ruled on the point of contention, and the point of contention is necessary for the making of the previous judgment. Then the two parties in the post-litigation can not repeat the point of contention. As the core rules of American civil action, the rule of dispute exclusion is widely and flexibly applied in order to avoid contradictory judgments and improve the efficiency of litigation. Reducing the waste of litigation resources and maintaining the stability of the judiciary play an active role. Based on the study of the connotation, historical evolution process, influence on other countries and regions and the operation in the United States of America, this paper combines with the development of res judicata theory system in our country. This paper analyzes the necessity, feasibility and existing obstacles of introducing the rules of contention exclusion in China, and points out that it is difficult and unrealistic to establish the rules of exclusion of points of contention in China in a short period of time. The rational approach is to further study the rules of contention exclusion in the United States and the relevant rules and systems to understand the theoretical knowledge of the rules of exclusion of points of contention more comprehensively, and gradually establish the idea of the rules of exclusion of points of contention among the judicial workers in our country. In order to realize the goal of establishing the rule of contention exclusion in our country, strict and detailed provisions are made on the applicable requirements, exceptions and special application conditions of the rules of contention exclusion in our country, and the corresponding procedural guarantees are provided.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 江偉,肖建國(guó);論既判力的客觀范圍[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年04期

2 許舒寧;;美國(guó)民事訴訟的排除規(guī)則及其借鑒意義[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

3 連品方;;爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)整理程序與即決判決制度的確立[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

4 李亮;;民事判決書判決理由探究[J];人民司法;2009年21期

5 黃ng;;民事案件事實(shí)爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)釋明模式建構(gòu)[J];人民司法;2011年15期

6 張自合;;論已決事實(shí)的預(yù)決效力——以臺(tái)灣地區(qū)爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)效的要件為借鑒[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 吳宜航;論民事爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)效力[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 顧登來;論“預(yù)決的事實(shí)”在后案審理中的作用[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

3 蔣陸軍;爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)效理論研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1949978