本文選題：歐洲中央銀行 + 法定權(quán)力��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：歐洲中央銀行是根據(jù)《馬斯特里赫特條約》在1998年正式成立的,歐洲央行成為歐洲中央銀行體系的核心機構(gòu),同時也成為歐盟的核心金融機構(gòu)。歐洲央行在歐盟構(gòu)建體系中占有重要地位,歐洲央行的法定權(quán)力對歐盟及其各成員國也有重要意義。但是,國內(nèi)學(xué)界對歐洲央行權(quán)力的研究多數(shù)是從經(jīng)濟學(xué)角度進行的,而從法學(xué)角度對歐洲央行權(quán)力的研究卻非常少。隨著歐元區(qū)主權(quán)債務(wù)危機的爆發(fā),歐洲央行開始啟動直接貨幣交易項目進行成員國主權(quán)債券購買舉措,而這一舉措引起了歐洲央行體系內(nèi)部乃至整個國際社會的爭論,歐洲中央銀行法定權(quán)力的相關(guān)問題一躍成為國際金融法領(lǐng)域最熱門的問題。本文從法學(xué)角度對歐洲央行法定權(quán)力的相關(guān)問題進行研究,并在文中著重探討歐洲央行法定權(quán)力在法學(xué)領(lǐng)域的爭議問題。文章圍繞歐洲央行法定權(quán)力的界定、歐洲央行法定權(quán)力的分類、歐洲央行法定權(quán)力的行使以及歐洲央行法定權(quán)力的效力四個方面對歐洲中央銀行的法定權(quán)力進行研究。以案例研究的方法對歐盟法院審理的案例中歐洲央行參與的典型案例進行分析,并在此基礎(chǔ)上討論歐洲央行的越權(quán)行為和起訴歐洲央行的主體資格問題。以比較研究方法對國際上的中央銀行權(quán)力進行探討,分析監(jiān)管權(quán)與貨幣權(quán)的關(guān)系。以比較研究方法對歐洲央行的法定權(quán)力與協(xié)定權(quán)力的要素進行對比,得出法定權(quán)力與協(xié)定權(quán)力的非對立關(guān)系和歐洲央行的權(quán)力應(yīng)屬于法定權(quán)力的結(jié)論。以法經(jīng)濟學(xué)研究的方法考量歐洲央行法定權(quán)力行使中存在的利益沖突問題。經(jīng)過上述研究方法的運用,以歐洲央行的權(quán)力界定、權(quán)力內(nèi)容、權(quán)力行使、權(quán)力審查以及權(quán)力效力等幾個方面構(gòu)建出歐洲央行法定權(quán)力的研究框架,并提出歐洲央行法定權(quán)力需要進一步規(guī)制的問題,如問責(zé)制等問題。
[Abstract]:The European Central Bank (ECB) was formally established in 1998 under the Maastricht Treaty. The ECB has become the core institution of the European Central Bank system as well as the core financial institution of the European Union. The ECB plays an important role in the construction of the European Union, and the ECB's statutory powers are also important to the EU and its member states. However, most of the researches on the power of the European Central Bank are carried out from the angle of economics, but the study of the power of the European Central Bank from the angle of law is very few. With the onset of the euro zone's sovereign debt crisis, the European Central Bank has launched a direct currency trading program to buy sovereign bonds of member states, which has caused controversy within the ECB system and in the international community as a whole. The question of the legal powers of the European Central Bank has become the hottest issue in the field of international financial law. This paper studies the legal power of the European Central Bank from the point of view of law, and focuses on the controversy of the legal power of the European Central Bank in the field of law. This paper focuses on the definition of the statutory powers of the ECB, the classification of the statutory powers of the ECB, the exercise of the statutory powers of the ECB and the effectiveness of the statutory powers of the ECB. This paper analyzes the typical cases in which the European Central Bank (ECB) is involved in the case heard by the European Union Court of Justice by case study, and on this basis discusses the question of the ECB's ultra vires behavior and the subject qualification of the prosecution of the ECB. This paper discusses the power of the central bank in the world by means of comparative research, and analyzes the relationship between the right of supervision and the right of money. By comparing the legal power of the European Central Bank with the elements of the agreement power, the conclusion is drawn that the legal power and the agreement power are not in opposition and the power of the European Central Bank should belong to the statutory power. The conflict of interest in the exercise of the legal power of the European Central Bank (ECB) is considered by means of legal and economic research. Through the application of the above research methods, the research framework of the legal power of the European Central Bank is constructed from the following aspects: the definition of power, the content of power, the exercise of power, the review of power and the effectiveness of power, and so on. It also points out that the ECB's statutory powers need to be regulated further, such as accountability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D95;DD912.28

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭紅楓;陳文博;譚小玉;;人民幣國際化研究述評[J];國際金融研究;2015年10期

2 王曉;李佳;;金融穩(wěn)定目標下貨幣政策與宏觀審慎監(jiān)管之間的關(guān)系:一個文獻綜述[J];國際金融研究;2013年04期

3 徐聰;;從歐債危機看歐洲央行的獨立性困境[J];歐洲研究;2012年04期

4 張青龍;;人民幣國際化對貨幣政策的影響:基于IS-LM模型分析[J];新金融;2011年02期

5 謝佑平;江涌;;論權(quán)力及其制約[J];東方法學(xué);2010年02期

6 張曉東;;論歐盟法的性質(zhì)及其對現(xiàn)代國際法的貢獻[J];歐洲研究;2010年01期

7 蘇楊;;從歐盟法的性質(zhì)看歐盟法與成員國法的關(guān)系[J];經(jīng)濟研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年34期

8 謝罡;;淺析歐盟法與成員國國內(nèi)法的關(guān)系[J];北京城市學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期

9 周旺生;論權(quán)力資源的法律調(diào)控動因[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2004年04期

10 趙全軍,陳艷艷;權(quán)力概念的多面解讀[J];云南社會科學(xué);2004年04期

，

本文編號：1943359