本文選題：刑事回避 + 回避程序比較�。� 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：回避制度作為維護(hù)司法公正中不可或缺的一項(xiàng)訴訟制度，它是指承辦本案的司法人員同案件有法律規(guī)定的情形時(shí)，不得參與該案件訴訟活動(dòng)的一種訴訟制度。它關(guān)系到職務(wù)活動(dòng)是否公正，案件能否順利進(jìn)行，當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)利能否得到保障。同時(shí)，回避程序作為回避制度的重要組成部分，回避制度的不斷完善可以使回避程序在實(shí)施過(guò)程中得到保障，回避程序的有效實(shí)施也能更好的促進(jìn)回避制度的不斷完善。兩者相輔相成，不可分割。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球一體化的發(fā)展，中國(guó)更不能單獨(dú)發(fā)展，所以，借鑒各國(guó)法律也成為現(xiàn)在有利于我國(guó)法律發(fā)展的手段之一。由于我國(guó)刑事回避程序還存在著不足，與其他國(guó)家的回避程序作比較研究，，也有利于豐富和完善刑事回避程序。但是我們也不能完全地照搬照抄他國(guó)的法律，應(yīng)根據(jù)中國(guó)國(guó)情揚(yáng)長(zhǎng)避短、取其精華、去其糟粕、以我為體、為我所用。從而更好地完善我國(guó)的法律制度，更好地服務(wù)社會(huì)。 本文包括引言、論文正文和結(jié)語(yǔ)，共三部分。 引言部分介紹了選題的緣起、完善其程序的重要性以及論文所要達(dá)致的目的。 在正文部分首先對(duì)刑事回避制度及其程序的涵義、刑事回避程序的意義進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的介紹，正文分為兩部分，一部分明確回避制度和回避程序的概念，以及二者之間的聯(lián)系。另一部分重點(diǎn)闡述刑事回避程序的意義。 其次對(duì)中美刑事訴訟回避程序分別從刑事訴訟回避主體、回避原由、啟動(dòng)程序、決定程序、法律后果以及回避救濟(jì)程序等六個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了比較。 再次探討我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟回避程序存在的問(wèn)題及完善的路徑。這部分為兩項(xiàng)內(nèi)容，一是介紹了回避程序在我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟中所存在的不足，包括主體范圍、回避責(zé)任等五方面存在的問(wèn)題。二是根據(jù)對(duì)這些問(wèn)題提出一些完善的建議。 通過(guò)中外回避制度進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的比較分析，對(duì)借鑒和學(xué)習(xí)外國(guó)的發(fā)展優(yōu)勢(shì)和積極因素，列舉我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟回避程序存在的問(wèn)題，有針對(duì)性的提出具體的解決對(duì)策，建立適合我國(guó)國(guó)情的中國(guó)特色的社會(huì)主義回避程序，促進(jìn)我國(guó)刑事程序的完善。
[Abstract]:As an indispensable litigation system in safeguarding judicial justice, the challenge system refers to a kind of litigation system in which the judicial personnel who undertake the case are not allowed to participate in the litigation activities of the case when there are legal provisions in the same case. It relates to whether the duty activity is fair, whether the case can proceed smoothly, and whether the legal rights of the parties concerned can be protected. At the same time, as an important part of the challenge system, the continuous improvement of the challenge procedure can ensure the challenge procedure in the implementation process, and the effective implementation of the challenge procedure can better promote the continuous improvement of the challenge system. The two complement each other and cannot be separated. With the development of global economic integration, China can not develop alone, therefore, drawing lessons from the laws of other countries has become one of the means in favor of the development of our country's law. Because of the deficiency of the criminal challenge procedure in our country, it is beneficial to enrich and perfect the criminal challenge procedure by comparing it with that of other countries. However, we can not copy the laws of other countries completely, we should take advantage of China's national conditions, take the essence, discard the dross, take me as the body, and use it for me. In order to better improve our legal system, better serve the society. This paper includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The preface introduces the origin of the topic, the importance of perfecting its procedure and the purpose of the thesis. In the main part, the meaning of the criminal challenge system and its procedure, the meaning of the criminal challenge procedure are introduced briefly, the text is divided into two parts, one part clarifies the concept of the challenge system and the challenge procedure, and the relationship between the two. The other part focuses on the significance of criminal avoidance procedure. Secondly, this paper compares the withdrawal procedure of Chinese and American criminal proceedings from six aspects, namely, the main body of the criminal procedure, the reasons for the withdrawal, the initiation of the procedure, the decision procedure, the legal consequences and the procedure of avoidance relief. Again, this paper discusses the existing problems and the perfect path of the current criminal procedure challenge procedure in our country. This part is two contents, one is to introduce the challenge procedure in the current criminal proceedings in our country, including the scope of the main body, evading responsibility and other five aspects of the problems. Second, according to these problems put forward some perfect suggestions. Through the systematic comparative analysis of the challenge system between China and foreign countries, this paper enumerates the problems existing in the current procedure of challenge in criminal proceedings in China, and puts forward some concrete countermeasures to solve the problems by using the development advantages and positive factors of foreign countries for reference and learning. To establish the socialist avoidance procedure with Chinese characteristics, which is suitable for our country's national conditions, and to promote the perfection of the criminal procedure in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 侯啟海;鄭宇紅;;論民事訴訟中回避制度的完善[J];浙江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

2 吳高慶;中意刑事回避制度之比較[J];河北法學(xué);1999年06期

3 劉加良,張亞瓊;完善刑事回避制度的一點(diǎn)思考——以麻廣軍妨害作證案為例[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

4 白淑卿;對(duì)我國(guó)刑事回避制度進(jìn)一步完善的思考[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1992年04期

5 鄭鎮(zhèn)寧;幸P;;回避制度的法律價(jià)值與審計(jì)回避創(chuàng)新的思考[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友(下旬刊);2007年11期

6 王海勇;;稅收回避制度亟待完善[J];天津經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年01期

7 張聲瑤;玩忽職守 錯(cuò)兌稻種 直接責(zé)任人被追究刑事責(zé)任[J];人民司法;1982年10期

8 肖常綸;略論刑事責(zé)任[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1988年00期

9 錢(qián)紹成;關(guān)于我國(guó)當(dāng)前刑事犯罪主要原因和刑事犯罪趨勢(shì)的思考[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);1995年04期

10 李記華;廣告犯罪的刑事責(zé)任探究[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 郭高;;我國(guó)刑事檢察權(quán)的合理配置與完善——經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[A];第五屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集[C];2009年

2 鞏富文;姚宏科;;刑事從寬政策之困境探析[A];第三屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集[C];2007年

3 薛培;王波;白文俊;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的刑事司法適用機(jī)制研究[A];第二屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集[C];2006年

4 張靜;;刑事證據(jù)收集的邏輯進(jìn)程[A];第十六屆全國(guó)法律邏輯學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文（成就·反思·前瞻——中國(guó)法律邏輯三十年）[C];2008年

5 杝怲夫;;有曑降低本澳刑事kx尙年焌的墜解[A];少年刑事司法制度學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2001年

6 鄭青;;我國(guó)刑事審前程序的重構(gòu)[A];首屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集[C];2005年

7 龔恒超;;董必武人民司法思想與外來(lái)涉罪未成年人的刑事司法保護(hù)[A];董必武法學(xué)思想研究文集（第十輯）[C];2010年

8 彭健夫;;香港刑事尙任年齡研究[A];青少年違法及藥物濫用防治對(duì)策學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];1999年

9 上海市人民檢察院第一分院量刑監(jiān)督制度研究課題組;沈新康;;和諧社會(huì)語(yǔ)境中量刑監(jiān)督的實(shí)踐與制度構(gòu)建[A];第三屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集[C];2007年

10 李玉臻;椨德i

本文編號(hào)：1935936