本文選題：反補貼法 + 案例研究　； 參考：《中國社會科學院研究生院》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自2007年美國對華銅紙板征收反補貼稅以來,美國反補貼法開始頻頻適用于中國。如今的美國反補貼法已成為美國對華實施貿(mào)易制裁的重要工具。中國出口貿(mào)易在應(yīng)對美國反傾銷的歷程中曾經(jīng)付出過慘痛的教訓,也總結(jié)出來之不易的實戰(zhàn)經(jīng)驗——通過對國際貿(mào)易實踐案例研究可以較快提升貿(mào)易爭端的應(yīng)對能力。有鑒于此,研究美國對華提起的反補貼案例亦可有效應(yīng)對美國反補貼法的對華適用。 研究案例發(fā)現(xiàn),美國對華反補貼中依據(jù)補貼形式的不同主要涉及的應(yīng)抵消補貼類型主要有以下四種:(1)政府獎金和商品服務(wù)應(yīng)抵消補貼;(2)直接稅減免應(yīng)抵消補貼;(3)間接稅減免應(yīng)抵消補貼;(4)出口信貸應(yīng)抵消補貼。上述應(yīng)抵消性補貼在中國國際貿(mào)易實踐中表現(xiàn)形式多樣。例如,(1)地方政府以購置國產(chǎn)設(shè)備為條件給予外資企業(yè)減免設(shè)備增值稅的進口替代補貼。在“Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico”1一案中美國商務(wù)部就認定中國出口產(chǎn)品存在上述應(yīng)抵消補貼。(2)政府基于出口實績給予出口企業(yè)的各類鼓勵基金。在“Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Parts Thereof from China”2一案中出口產(chǎn)品就存在上述應(yīng)抵消補貼。(3)外商投資企業(yè)稅收減免優(yōu)惠。在“PC Strand from China”3一案中被調(diào)查外商投資企業(yè)就已享受上述補貼。(4)政府性銀行基于出口實績或?qū)鴥?nèi)特殊企業(yè)或特定產(chǎn)業(yè)給予的低于相同條件下市場基準利率的貸款。在“Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China”4一案中美國商務(wù)部就認定中國企業(yè)已獲得上述應(yīng)抵消補貼。(5)政府對轄區(qū)內(nèi)出口企業(yè)或特定產(chǎn)業(yè)或特殊企業(yè)提供優(yōu)于其對非出口企業(yè)的商品和服務(wù)供應(yīng)等。在“Steel Grating from China”5一案中美國商務(wù)部就認定中國出口產(chǎn)品存在上述應(yīng)抵消補貼。 針對上述中國貿(mào)易中應(yīng)抵消補貼的實踐表現(xiàn),本文歸納出其對中國貿(mào)易重要的借鑒意義,如嚴格進行補貼項目專向性審查、全面收集和整理補貼信息、踐行產(chǎn)業(yè)優(yōu)惠為主導,地區(qū)優(yōu)惠為輔助的稅收優(yōu)惠原則、認真貫徹2008年《中華人民共和國企業(yè)所得稅法》的“四統(tǒng)一”原則,6即內(nèi)外資企業(yè)統(tǒng)一實施該法、統(tǒng)一使用新的企業(yè)所得稅率、統(tǒng)一和規(guī)范稅前扣除辦法和標準、統(tǒng)一稅收優(yōu)惠政策、防止稅收優(yōu)惠專向性、嚴格對比市場標準進行出口信貸、明確信貸獲得的條件及來源等。凡事預(yù)則立,不預(yù)則廢。中國貿(mào)易面對美國反補貼應(yīng)當做好充分的應(yīng)對準備。隨著中國貿(mào)易的不斷發(fā)展,相信中國會越來越輕松自如地應(yīng)對美國反補貼。
[Abstract]:Since 2007, when the United States imposed countervailing duties on copper cardboard, the United States countervailing law has frequently been applied to China. Today, the US anti-subsidy law has become an important tool for the United States to impose trade sanctions against China. China's export trade has paid a painful lesson in the course of dealing with American anti-dumping, and summed up the hard-won experience of actual combat. Through the case study of international trade practice, the ability to deal with trade disputes can be improved quickly. In view of this, the study of American countervailing cases in China can effectively deal with the application of American countervailing law to China. The case study found that The different types of countervailing subsidies in the United States to China are mainly related to the following four types of countervailing subsidies: government bonuses and goods and services should offset subsidies. Elimination of subsidies 4) Export credits should offset subsidies. The above-mentioned countervailing subsidies are varied in China's international trade practice. For example, local governments grant foreign enterprises import substitution subsidies for equipment value-added tax (VAT) on the condition of purchasing domestic equipment. In the case of "Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico" 1, the U.S. Commerce Department determined that there were various types of incentives for export companies based on export performance. In the case of "Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Parts Thereof from China" 2, the export products have the above offset subsidies. In the case of "PC Strand from China" 3, foreign-invested enterprises have already benefited from the subsidies mentioned above.) Government banks have granted loans based on export performance or to special domestic enterprises or industries below the market benchmark interest rate under the same conditions. In the "Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People's Republic of China" 4 case, the United States Department of Commerce held that Chinese enterprises had received the above countervailing subsidy. 5) the Government provided superior treatment to export enterprises or specific industries or special enterprises within its jurisdiction. The supply of goods and services, etc by exporting enterprises. In the Steel Grating from China 5 case, the Commerce Department ruled that the offsetting subsidies existed for Chinese exports. In view of the practice performance of countervailing subsidies in the above mentioned Chinese trade, this paper sums up its important reference significance for China's trade, such as strictly carrying out the specific examination of subsidy projects, collecting and collating the subsidy information in an all-round way, and practicing industrial preferences as the leading factor. The "four Unification" principles of the 2008 "Enterprise income tax Law of the people's Republic of China" [6] that is, the unified implementation of the law by domestic and foreign enterprises and the uniform use of the new enterprise income tax rate, Unifying and standardizing the methods and standards of deduction before tax, unifying the preferential policy of tax, preventing the specificity of tax preference, strictly contrasting the market standard for export credit, defining the conditions and sources of obtaining credit, etc. Nothing is expected, but nothing is done. China's trade should be well prepared in the face of US countervailing. As China's trade continues to grow, it is believed that China will more and more easily deal with American countervailing.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.29;D971.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 于海霞;李丹丹;;歐盟、美國反補貼立法及對策研究[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2006年02期

2 夏蘭,劉陽;中美反補貼法律機制的幾點比較[J];江西財經(jīng)大學學報;2005年03期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 甘瑛;國際貨物貿(mào)易中的補貼與反補貼法律問題研究[D];廈門大學;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 同曉芬;美國反補貼法的修改及中國的法律應(yīng)對[D];西北大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1914933