本文選題：契約締結(jié) + 沽酒��； 參考：《法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展》2017年06期

【摘要】：夏商時(shí)期,酒是締結(jié)天人之契的必要介質(zhì),其在使締約儀式具有象征意義的同時(shí),兼具權(quán)威性。周時(shí),約和盟的締結(jié)憑借酒的儀式性功用,使其在人間契約的締結(jié)中也成了必備品。秦漢時(shí)期,國(guó)家公權(quán)力對(duì)契約管理不甚全面,沽酒條款的功用是證明契約的有效性,從而保障了契約的順利履行。從唐宋時(shí)期開(kāi)始,國(guó)家公權(quán)力開(kāi)始加強(qiáng)對(duì)契約的管理,沽酒條款從現(xiàn)世契約中消失,轉(zhuǎn)而適用于"買(mǎi)地券"——這種公權(quán)力沒(méi)有觸及的虛擬買(mǎi)陰宅契約中,但是"沽酒"作為民事習(xí)慣還存在于人間締結(jié)現(xiàn)世契約的儀式上,協(xié)助國(guó)家公權(quán)力證明契約的效力。經(jīng)過(guò)縱向的比較研究發(fā)現(xiàn),沽酒條款的演化過(guò)程也是契約神化因素退卻,而人文化、制度化加強(qiáng)的過(guò)程。
[Abstract]:During the Xia and Shang dynasties, wine was the necessary medium for the conclusion of the contract between heaven and man, which had symbolic significance as well as authority. In the Zhou Dynasty, the conclusion of the covenant and alliance, with the ceremonial function of wine, made it necessary in the conclusion of the human contract. During the Qin and Han dynasties, the state public power was not comprehensive in the management of the contract, and the function of the liquor selling clause was to prove the validity of the contract, thus ensuring the smooth implementation of the contract. Since the Tang and Song dynasties, the state public power began to strengthen the management of the contract, and the terms of selling wine disappeared from the earthly contract, and then applied to the "purchase of land coupons"-this kind of public power did not touch the virtual purchase of Yin House contract. However, as a civil custom, "selling wine" still exists in the ceremony of the earthly contract, helping the state to prove the validity of the contract. Through the longitudinal comparative study, it is found that the evolution process of the terms of selling wine is also the process of renunciation of contract deification factors, and the strengthening of human culture and institutionalization.
【作者單位】： 沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;吉林大學(xué)古籍研究所;
【基金】：2015年度國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“古代中國(guó)契約法觀念與技術(shù)研究”(15BFX025) 2015年度中國(guó)博士后科學(xué)基金面上資助項(xiàng)目“漢代契約類(lèi)文書(shū)的整理與研究”(2015M571352)的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張姍姍;;古中國(guó)的契約觀念——以唐、宋為中心[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2008年02期

2 王子清;避免我國(guó)法律文化的“大躍進(jìn)”[J];福建金融管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

3 郭長(zhǎng)軍;;市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)與契約[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年12期

4 季金華;;論法治的社會(huì)契約觀念及其市民社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)[J];法制現(xiàn)代化研究;2001年00期

5 張恒山;;論法治思維的觀念基礎(chǔ)[J];理論與改革;2013年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 四川大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 喻中;從契約到身份的運(yùn)動(dòng)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

2 胡志超;“從契約到身份”的變遷與司法援助制度[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 丁敏;清代華北地區(qū)田房契約文書(shū)粘連結(jié)構(gòu)及其契約觀念[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2001年

2 張姍姍;古中國(guó)的契約概念與契約觀[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1914694