本文選題：強制性法規(guī) + 違法內(nèi)容　； 參考：《華東政法大學學報》2017年01期

【摘要】：強制性法規(guī),有多種類型。合同違反不同類型的強制性法規(guī),其效力各異。故理論上應先區(qū)分不同類型的強制性法規(guī),再分別考察合同違反此等法規(guī)的效力。瑞士學界和司法界認為,強制性法規(guī)有公法上的和私法上的兩種。公法上法規(guī),多為強制性,其理論重點不在此等法規(guī)強制性的識別上,而在合同違反此等法規(guī)的效力上。私法上法規(guī)多不具強制性,故此等法規(guī)強制性的認定為重點之一,違反此等強制性法規(guī)的合同效力為重點之二。借助審判實踐,違反強制性法規(guī)的合同效力在瑞士法上得到一定程度的類型化。
[Abstract]:There are many types of mandatory regulations. Contracts violate different types of mandatory regulations and have different effects. Therefore, in theory, different types of mandatory laws and regulations should be distinguished, and then the validity of breach of these regulations should be investigated separately. The Swiss academic and judicial circles believe that there are two kinds of peremptory legislation: public law and private law. Laws and regulations in public law are mostly mandatory. The theoretical emphasis is not on the mandatory identification of these regulations, but on the validity of the breach of these laws by contract. Most laws and regulations in private law are not mandatory, so the mandatory recognition of these laws and regulations is one of the key points, and the second is the contract effectiveness of violating these mandatory laws and regulations. With the help of trial practice, the validity of contract in violation of compulsory laws and regulations has been classified to a certain extent in Swiss law.
【作者單位】： 瑞士弗里堡大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金一般項目“電子支付民事法律問題研究”(項目號14BFX164)的階段性研究成果 留學基金委留學基金資助
【分類號】：DD913;D952.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 夏峰;;銀行卡跨行收費不違反強制性法規(guī)[J];金融博覽;2006年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 本報記者 王斌;“停車超3分鐘熄火”或成強制性法規(guī)[N];法制日報;2013年

，

本文編號：1863646