本文選題：法律現(xiàn)實主義 + 實證研究　； 參考：《法學家》2014年04期

【摘要】：對新法律現(xiàn)實主義之所以被提出的背景與意義的闡釋,離不開對自20世紀二三十年代以來興起的舊法律現(xiàn)實主義、法律過程主義、批判法學、法社會學、法經(jīng)濟學等流派與運動的梳理。新法律現(xiàn)實主義不僅延續(xù)了舊法律現(xiàn)實主義對事實和開放法學研究的提倡,還強調對已有的多學科方法研究成果的法律性重視,也呼吁其它學科的研究關注其研究的法律實質意義。在其推動下,傳統(tǒng)的法學研究和利用其它學科方法展開的法學研究得以更好地滲透和合作,使得學科整合和實證法學研究更為有效地進行。
[Abstract]:The explanation of the background and significance of the new legal realism is inseparable from the old legal realism, legal process doctrine, critical jurisprudence, and sociology of law which have arisen since the 1920s and 1930s. The carding of schools and movements of law and economics. New legal realism not only continues the advocacy of the old legal realism for the study of facts and open jurisprudence, but also emphasizes the legal importance attached to the research results of the existing multidisciplinary methods. It also appeals to other disciplines to pay attention to the legal significance of their research. Under its impetus, the traditional law research and the law research carried out by using other discipline methods can better infiltrate and cooperate, so that the subject integration and the empirical law research are carried out more effectively.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學法學院;
【基金】：中國人民大學科學研究基金(中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務費專項資金)資助項目“中國案例檢索系統(tǒng)的完善——基于中美的比較研究”(項目編號:2013030014)的研究成果
【分類號】：D909.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 許慶坤;;重讀美國法律現(xiàn)實主義[J];比較法研究;2007年04期

2 劉，

本文編號：1831447