本文選題：口供 + 自由、自愿原則�。� 參考：《比較法研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：受歐洲人權(quán)法院的壓力,法國(guó)于2011年出臺(tái)了《刑事拘留法》,明確了口供的自由、自愿原則。在內(nèi)容上,口供自由、自愿原則包括權(quán)利告知、獲取口供的合法性限制以及非法口供排除的自由評(píng)價(jià)。從制度設(shè)計(jì)上,法國(guó)式的口供自由、自愿原則具有三大特點(diǎn):以判例為主導(dǎo)的非法口供排除規(guī)則體系、"相對(duì)無效為主、絕對(duì)無效為輔"的排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及以中立司法官為主要的權(quán)力監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)。盡管口供的自由、自愿原則已在法國(guó)扎根并日漸成熟,但仍帶有濃厚的職權(quán)主義色彩。從根本而論,"社會(huì)利益優(yōu)先"、"國(guó)家權(quán)力主導(dǎo)"、"追求實(shí)質(zhì)真實(shí)"等核心目標(biāo)在法國(guó)刑事訴訟中未發(fā)生根本變化,公權(quán)力機(jī)構(gòu)在刑事司法體系中還處于較優(yōu)勢(shì)的地位。
[Abstract]:Under pressure from the European Court of Human Rights, France introduced the Criminal Detention Act in 2011, which clarifies the principle of free and voluntary confessions. In content, freedom of confession, voluntary principle includes the right to inform, the limitation of the legality of obtaining confession and the free evaluation of the exclusion of illegal confession. In terms of system design, the principle of freedom of confession in French style and voluntary principle have three characteristics: the rule system of illegal confession exclusion, which is dominated by case law, is relatively invalid. Exclusion criteria for absolute invalidity and neutral magistrates as the main supervisory authority. Although the freedom of confession and the principle of volunteerism have taken root and matured in France, there is still a strong sense of authoritarianism. Fundamentally speaking, the core goals of "social interests first", "state power leading" and "pursuing substantial truth" have not fundamentally changed in French criminal proceedings, and the public power institutions are still in a more advantageous position in the criminal justice system.
【作者單位】： "2011
【分類號(hào)】：D956.5;DD915.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 沈愛玲;;博物館收購(gòu)文物行為法律效力分析[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2011年10期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1816953