發(fā)布時間：2018-04-16 12:32

  本文選題：賠命價習慣法 + 刑事和解�。� 參考：《西南財經(jīng)大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：藏民族地域分布廣泛、文化背景特殊,在其漫長的歷史中形成了獨具特色的習慣法和糾紛解決機制。這些習慣法是藏族文化系統(tǒng)的組成部分,承載著藏族民眾特別的心理、觀念、情感和價值標準。賠命價就是典型體現(xiàn)。即使在制定法越來越健全的21世紀,藏族習慣法例如賠命價與國家制定法在藏區(qū)的博弈從未間斷。通過對當今甘孜藏區(qū)的實證考察,可以看到賠命價習慣法與國家制定法之間的對壘依舊在上演,甘孜地區(qū)發(fā)生的刑事案件雖然都基本進入司法程序,但與此同時民間調解——賠命價習慣法卻并行不悖。 賠命價習慣法的運行活力,來自于藏區(qū)地光人稀的自然環(huán)境、粗放的生產方式；來自于藏民生死輪回、因果報應、追求和諧的價值理念；來自于賠命價在藏區(qū)能夠有效解決糾紛且成本低廉的有效功能；來自于國家制定法作為一種外來文化的陌生以及忽略被害人利益的漏洞等。但不可否認的是,賠命習慣法的運行也存在許多不盡人意的因素,例如其作為一種自然生發(fā)的法文化,其不具有明確性,行為人對自己的行為不可預期,違背罪行法定原則；其權威性主要來自于民眾對宗教的信仰,容易導致宗教干預司法等。而國家制定法與賠命價習慣法的雙重運行,看似緩和了二者的矛盾,但對于加害方來說,違背了一事不再罰原則,違背了罪責自負原則。 可見兩種法律各有利弊,因此廢除“賠命價”刑事習慣法,強行執(zhí)行國家刑事制定法實行一刀切的做法并不可取；任由“賠命價”刑事習慣法肆意發(fā)展,也不利于藏區(qū)的法制建設及社會穩(wěn)定。因此有必要對賠命價習慣法運行的效果進行客觀分析、理性評價,探究其運行的自然、文化背景。從而在法治現(xiàn)代化的不斷推進的背景下,嘗試在賠命價習慣法與國家統(tǒng)一制定法之間搭建一座橋梁,例如刑事和解制度,以監(jiān)督賠命價習慣法的運行,防止其濫用,并發(fā)揮賠命價習慣法對國家法治建設的積極作用。 本文將分為四部分展開論述,導論主要介紹選題緣由和國內學界關于藏區(qū)賠命價習慣法的研究現(xiàn)狀,并介紹筆者的研究思路和方法；第一章對藏區(qū)賠命價習慣法的制度框架、實證運行狀況進行解讀,主要以四川甘孜藏區(qū)的丹巴縣為例介紹了賠命價習慣法的適用范圍、適用主體、運行程序,并從積極和消極兩方面評價賠命價習慣法的運行。第二章分別從自然環(huán)境、文化背景、國家制定法供給不足的方面分析賠命價習慣法在藏區(qū)運行的原因。第三章嘗試以刑事和解為視角,即刑事和解制度在藏區(qū)的建構,實現(xiàn)賠命價習慣法與國家制定法的對接,從而為國家法整合習慣法,調適賠命價習慣法與制定法之間的沖突尋找一種出路。
[Abstract]:The Tibetan nationality has a wide geographical distribution and special cultural background, and has formed a unique customary law and dispute resolution mechanism in its long history.These customary laws are an integral part of the Tibetan cultural system and bear the special psychological, conceptual, emotional and value standards of the Tibetan people.Loss price is a typical embodiment.Even in the 21st century, the Tibetan customary laws, such as the compensation price and the state law, have never stopped in the Tibetan area.Through an empirical study of the Tibetan area of Ganzi today, we can see that the confrontation between the customary law of compensation and the law of state formulation is still going on. Although the criminal cases that have occurred in the Ganzi area have basically entered the judicial process,But at the same time, folk mediation-life-loss customary law is parallel.The operation vitality of the customary law of compensation price comes from the natural environment and extensive production mode of Tibetan people, from the cycle of life and death of Tibetan people, from karma, from the pursuit of harmonious values.It comes from the effective function that the compensation price can solve disputes effectively and the cost is low in Tibetan area; it comes from the foreign culture of the national legislation and the loopholes of ignoring the interests of the victims and so on.However, it is undeniable that there are many unsatisfactory factors in the operation of the customary law of compensation, for example, as a natural law culture, it is not clear, the actor can not expect their own behavior, violating the legal principle of crime;Its authority mainly comes from the people's belief in religion, which easily leads to religious interference in the judiciary and so on.The dual operation of the state law and the customary law of compensation for life price seems to alleviate the contradiction between them, but for the offending party, it violates the principle of no punishment of the matter and violates the principle of guilt and responsibility.We can see that the two kinds of laws have their advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, it is not advisable to abolish the "compensation for life" criminal customary law and enforce the national criminal law to implement a one-size-fits-all approach; and to allow the "compensation for life" criminal customary law to be wantonly developed.It is also not conducive to the construction of the legal system and social stability in Tibetan areas.Therefore, it is necessary to objectively analyze and rationally evaluate the effect of customary law of compensation price, and explore its natural and cultural background.In the context of the modernization of the rule of law, this paper tries to build a bridge between the customary law of compensation and the unified law of the state, such as the system of criminal reconciliation, in order to supervise the operation of the customary law of compensation for life and prevent its abuse.And play a positive role in the construction of the country's rule of law.This article will be divided into four parts to discuss, the introduction mainly introduces the reason of selecting the topic and the current situation of the domestic academic research on the customary law of life price in Tibetan area, and introduces the author's research ideas and methods; the first chapter introduces the institutional framework of the customary law of the compensation price of life in the Tibetan area.Taking Danba County of Ganzi Tibetan District in Sichuan Province as an example, this paper introduces the applicable scope, applicable subject, operation procedure of the customary law of life price, and evaluates the operation of the customary law of compensation price from both positive and negative aspects.The second chapter analyzes the reasons for the operation of the customary law in Tibetan area from the aspects of natural environment, cultural background and insufficient supply of national law.The third chapter tries to construct the criminal reconciliation system in Tibetan area from the angle of criminal reconciliation, to realize the connection between the customary law of compensation price and the national law, so as to integrate the customary law for the national law.To find a way out of the conflict between customary law and statutory law.
【學位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D920.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 淡樂蓉;;藏族“賠命價”與國家法的漏洞補充問題[J];中國藏學;2008年03期

2 淡樂蓉;;藏族“賠命價”習慣法與日耳曼民族“贖罪金”制度的比較研究[J];中國藏學;2010年01期

3 蘇永生;;“文化的刑法解釋論”之提倡——以“賠命價”習慣法為例[J];法商研究;2008年05期

4 楊華雙;;嘉絨藏區(qū)刑事習慣法分析[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2006年01期

5 蘇永生;;國家刑事制定法對少數(shù)民族刑事習慣法的滲透與整合——以藏族“賠命價”習慣法為視角[J];法學研究;2007年06期

6 徐澄清;關于“賠命價”“賠血價”問題的法律思考和立法建議[J];人大研究;1999年08期

7 鄒敏;;少數(shù)民族習慣法與國家制定法的調適——以藏族“賠命價”習慣法為例[J];西北第二民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年04期

8 劉俊哲;;藏傳佛教生態(tài)倫理試析——兼論藏傳佛教生態(tài)倫理與儒、道及西方生態(tài)倫理之同異[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2007年02期

9 南杰·隆英強;孟繁智;;藏族習慣法如何適應社會主義法制建設的思考——從藏族習慣法中的“賠命價、賠血價”談起[J];西藏民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年02期

10 向朝陽,馬靜華;刑事和解的價值構造及中國模式的構建[J];中國法學;2003年06期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 呂志祥;藏族習慣法及其轉型研究[D];蘭州大學;2007年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 董朝陽;藏族賠命金習慣法與國家制定法的沖突與調適[D];中國政法大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1758933