本文選題：Speaker案 + Daniels案��； 參考：《比較法研究》2014年06期

【摘要】：美國Speaker案和Daniels案,揭示了為防治傳染病而頻繁使用的強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療控制措施,卻屢次傷害和侵襲公民個(gè)體的權(quán)利和自由的現(xiàn)實(shí)。實(shí)體法必須對(duì)自由進(jìn)行限制,但其正當(dāng)性還應(yīng)得到程序性規(guī)則之檢視。兩起事件暴露出美國傳染病防治中出現(xiàn)的立法及法律實(shí)施問題,在強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療過程中完善保障患者權(quán)利的規(guī)則、明確法院審查原則和審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以提高審判智慧方面,為我們提供了經(jīng)驗(yàn)和借鑒。
[Abstract]:The cases of Speaker and Daniels in the United States reveal the reality of the frequent use of compulsory medical control measures for the prevention and control of infectious diseases, while repeatedly harming and attacking the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.Substantive law must restrict freedom, but its legitimacy should be examined by procedural rules.The two incidents exposed the problems of legislation and law enforcement in the prevention and control of infectious diseases in the United States. In the process of compulsory medical treatment, they improved the rules to protect the rights of patients and clarified the principles and standards of court review in order to enhance the wisdom of the trial.For us to provide experience and reference.
【作者單位】： 南方醫(yī)科大學(xué)人文與管理學(xué)院法學(xué)系;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究青年課題“強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療法律關(guān)系研究”(10YJC820054)的研究成果 廣州市城鄉(xiāng)公共衛(wèi)生服務(wù)體系建設(shè)研究基地研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 ;非典確診病人逃跑造成嚴(yán)重后果將被重處[N];中國石化報(bào);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1749685