本文選題：立法后評估 + 立法后評估結果�。� 參考：《廣東財經(jīng)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為社會主義法治國家建設進程的重要環(huán)節(jié),立法后評估對于提高立法質量,改進立法工作具有特殊的意義和價值。立法后評估結果是立法后評估主體對法律實施效果進行評價后所形成的評估報告,目的在于針對法律法規(guī)自身的缺陷能夠及時加以修改和完善,即通過“立法回頭看”的方式對法律法規(guī)進行完善。實踐表明,要真正使立法后評估制度發(fā)揮實效,實現(xiàn)法律法規(guī)的與時俱進,應當保障立法后評估結果得到國家立法機關的有效回應,構建起完善的立法后評估結果的回應機制。立法后評估結果的回應機制,是指特定國家機關按照法定程序機制,對立法后評估報告中指出的立法質量和法律法規(guī)實施等方面的問題,采取特定方式作出回復或反應,以實現(xiàn)立法后評估制度的預期目的。文章通過對立法后評估回應進行規(guī)范分析和實踐考察,從立法層面的完善、主體能力的加強和配套制度的建構三個方面入手提出了構想,認為完善立法后評估回應機制的關鍵在于構建起有效支撐立法后評估回應的立法體制,從頂層設計的角度重塑立法后評估回應的組織機構和運作機制,實現(xiàn)立法后評估結果回應制度的統(tǒng)一化、規(guī)范化和制度化。從規(guī)范層面而言,由《立法法》對立法后評估回應內容進行宏觀規(guī)定有助于規(guī)范化的立法后評估回應機制的有序運作。同時,各地關于立法后評估制度的規(guī)范性文件應當對回應機制的具體操作進行細化,對立法后評估回應的主體、程序、方式等進行明確規(guī)定,使立法后評估制度更具有針對性、可操作性和有效性。此外,還要加強立法后評估回應主體能力建設及健全相關配套制度。唯有如此,完善立法質量的最終目的才能得以實現(xiàn),立法后評估制度才真正發(fā)揮了其應有功能。
[Abstract]:As an important link in the process of building a socialist country ruled by law, post-legislative evaluation has special significance and value for improving the quality of legislation and improving the work of legislation.The result of post-legislative evaluation is an evaluation report formed by the subject of post-legislative evaluation of the effect of law implementation. The purpose of the report is to modify and perfect the laws and regulations in time in view of their own shortcomings.That is, through the "legislation look back" way to improve the laws and regulations.Practice shows that in order to make the system of post-legislative evaluation effective and realize the laws and regulations to keep pace with the times, we should ensure that the results of post-legislative evaluation get an effective response from the national legislative organs, and construct a perfect response mechanism of the post-legislative evaluation results.The response mechanism of the results of the post-legislative evaluation refers to the specific state organs responding or responding to the problems concerning the quality of the legislation and the implementation of laws and regulations, as pointed out in the report on the post-legislative assessment, in accordance with the mechanism of legal procedures.In order to achieve the purpose of the post-legislative evaluation system.Through the normative analysis and practice investigation of the post-legislative evaluation response, this paper puts forward the conception from three aspects: the perfection of legislation, the strengthening of the subject's ability and the construction of supporting system.The key to perfect the post-legislative evaluation response mechanism is to construct a legislative system to support the post-legislative evaluation response effectively, and to reshape the organization and operation mechanism of the post-legislative evaluation response from the perspective of top-level design.To realize the unification, standardization and institutionalization of the response system of the evaluation results after legislation.From the normative level, the macro-regulation of the content of post-legislative evaluation response by the Legislative Law is helpful to the orderly operation of the standardized post-legislative evaluation response mechanism.At the same time, the local normative documents on the post-legislative evaluation system should refine the concrete operation of the response mechanism, clearly stipulate the subject, procedure and manner of the post-legislative evaluation response, so as to make the post-legislative evaluation system more targeted.Maneuverability and effectiveness.In addition, we should strengthen the capacity building of the post-legislative evaluation response and improve the relevant supporting system.Only in this way, the final goal of perfecting the quality of legislation can be realized, and the system of post-legislative evaluation can really play its proper function.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D920.0

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳焱光;張耀方;;地方立法調研規(guī)范化研究[J];江漢大學學報(社會科學版);2016年05期

2 李巍;;地方立法公眾參與的因應之策[J];中共四川省委黨校學報;2016年02期

3 陳建華;;立法協(xié)商主體探析[J];河北法學;2016年03期

4 鄭功成;;全面提升立法質量是依法治國的根本途徑[J];國家行政學院學報;2015年01期

5 馮玉軍;王柏榮;;科學立法的科學性標準探析[J];中國人民大學學報;2014年01期

6 任懿;;“人民”內涵的法理釋義[J];河北法學;2013年05期

7 宋明;陳佳林;;特區(qū)立法評估回應機制研究[J];中國經(jīng)濟特區(qū)研究;2012年00期

8 俞榮根;;立法后評估:法律體系形成后的一項重要工作[J];西南政法大學學報;2011年01期

9 汪全勝;陳光;;立法后評估結果的回應機制[J];鄭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2011年01期

10 汪全勝;陳光;;立法后評估的回應滯阻析論[J];理論與改革;2010年05期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 李立;;國務院法制辦立法后評估運作詳情[N];法制日報;2007年

，

本文編號：1735509