本文選題：立法后評估 + 立法后評估結(jié)果　； 參考：《廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為社會主義法治國家建設(shè)進(jìn)程的重要環(huán)節(jié),立法后評估對于提高立法質(zhì)量,改進(jìn)立法工作具有特殊的意義和價值。立法后評估結(jié)果是立法后評估主體對法律實施效果進(jìn)行評價后所形成的評估報告,目的在于針對法律法規(guī)自身的缺陷能夠及時加以修改和完善,即通過“立法回頭看”的方式對法律法規(guī)進(jìn)行完善。實踐表明,要真正使立法后評估制度發(fā)揮實效,實現(xiàn)法律法規(guī)的與時俱進(jìn),應(yīng)當(dāng)保障立法后評估結(jié)果得到國家立法機關(guān)的有效回應(yīng),構(gòu)建起完善的立法后評估結(jié)果的回應(yīng)機制。立法后評估結(jié)果的回應(yīng)機制,是指特定國家機關(guān)按照法定程序機制,對立法后評估報告中指出的立法質(zhì)量和法律法規(guī)實施等方面的問題,采取特定方式作出回復(fù)或反應(yīng),以實現(xiàn)立法后評估制度的預(yù)期目的。文章通過對立法后評估回應(yīng)進(jìn)行規(guī)范分析和實踐考察,從立法層面的完善、主體能力的加強和配套制度的建構(gòu)三個方面入手提出了構(gòu)想,認(rèn)為完善立法后評估回應(yīng)機制的關(guān)鍵在于構(gòu)建起有效支撐立法后評估回應(yīng)的立法體制,從頂層設(shè)計的角度重塑立法后評估回應(yīng)的組織機構(gòu)和運作機制,實現(xiàn)立法后評估結(jié)果回應(yīng)制度的統(tǒng)一化、規(guī)范化和制度化。從規(guī)范層面而言,由《立法法》對立法后評估回應(yīng)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行宏觀規(guī)定有助于規(guī)范化的立法后評估回應(yīng)機制的有序運作。同時,各地關(guān)于立法后評估制度的規(guī)范性文件應(yīng)當(dāng)對回應(yīng)機制的具體操作進(jìn)行細(xì)化,對立法后評估回應(yīng)的主體、程序、方式等進(jìn)行明確規(guī)定,使立法后評估制度更具有針對性、可操作性和有效性。此外,還要加強立法后評估回應(yīng)主體能力建設(shè)及健全相關(guān)配套制度。唯有如此,完善立法質(zhì)量的最終目的才能得以實現(xiàn),立法后評估制度才真正發(fā)揮了其應(yīng)有功能。
[Abstract]:As an important link in the process of building a socialist country ruled by law, post-legislative evaluation has special significance and value for improving the quality of legislation and improving the work of legislation.The result of post-legislative evaluation is an evaluation report formed by the subject of post-legislative evaluation of the effect of law implementation. The purpose of the report is to modify and perfect the laws and regulations in time in view of their own shortcomings.That is, through the "legislation look back" way to improve the laws and regulations.Practice shows that in order to make the system of post-legislative evaluation effective and realize the laws and regulations to keep pace with the times, we should ensure that the results of post-legislative evaluation get an effective response from the national legislative organs, and construct a perfect response mechanism of the post-legislative evaluation results.The response mechanism of the results of the post-legislative evaluation refers to the specific state organs responding or responding to the problems concerning the quality of the legislation and the implementation of laws and regulations, as pointed out in the report on the post-legislative assessment, in accordance with the mechanism of legal procedures.In order to achieve the purpose of the post-legislative evaluation system.Through the normative analysis and practice investigation of the post-legislative evaluation response, this paper puts forward the conception from three aspects: the perfection of legislation, the strengthening of the subject's ability and the construction of supporting system.The key to perfect the post-legislative evaluation response mechanism is to construct a legislative system to support the post-legislative evaluation response effectively, and to reshape the organization and operation mechanism of the post-legislative evaluation response from the perspective of top-level design.To realize the unification, standardization and institutionalization of the response system of the evaluation results after legislation.From the normative level, the macro-regulation of the content of post-legislative evaluation response by the Legislative Law is helpful to the orderly operation of the standardized post-legislative evaluation response mechanism.At the same time, the local normative documents on the post-legislative evaluation system should refine the concrete operation of the response mechanism, clearly stipulate the subject, procedure and manner of the post-legislative evaluation response, so as to make the post-legislative evaluation system more targeted.Maneuverability and effectiveness.In addition, we should strengthen the capacity building of the post-legislative evaluation response and improve the relevant supporting system.Only in this way, the final goal of perfecting the quality of legislation can be realized, and the system of post-legislative evaluation can really play its proper function.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳焱光;張耀方;;地方立法調(diào)研規(guī)范化研究[J];江漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2016年05期

2 李巍;;地方立法公眾參與的因應(yīng)之策[J];中共四川省委黨校學(xué)報;2016年02期

3 陳建華;;立法協(xié)商主體探析[J];河北法學(xué);2016年03期

4 鄭功成;;全面提升立法質(zhì)量是依法治國的根本途徑[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年01期

5 馮玉軍;王柏榮;;科學(xué)立法的科學(xué)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)探析[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年01期

6 任懿;;“人民”內(nèi)涵的法理釋義[J];河北法學(xué);2013年05期

7 宋明;陳佳林;;特區(qū)立法評估回應(yīng)機制研究[J];中國經(jīng)濟特區(qū)研究;2012年00期

8 俞榮根;;立法后評估:法律體系形成后的一項重要工作[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年01期

9 汪全勝;陳光;;立法后評估結(jié)果的回應(yīng)機制[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

10 汪全勝;陳光;;立法后評估的回應(yīng)滯阻析論[J];理論與改革;2010年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 李立;;國務(wù)院法制辦立法后評估運作詳情[N];法制日報;2007年

，

本文編號：1735509