本文選題：法律信任　切入點(diǎn)：法的價(jià)值合理性　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：法律信任何以是可能的?在很大程度上,它需要由法律的價(jià)值合理性、法律的形式合理性以及法律在實(shí)際運(yùn)行中的執(zhí)行情況這三個(gè)因素來(lái)決定。這是本文探討法律信任合理性的主線。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分。其中,第一部分是對(duì)法律信任構(gòu)成與法律信任合理性的綜述,后面三個(gè)部分則從三個(gè)角度分別對(duì)法律信任合理性要素進(jìn)行具體闡釋。第一部分主要是為了解決兩個(gè)問題。其一,法律信任的內(nèi)在構(gòu)成應(yīng)當(dāng)如何剖析?這是后文進(jìn)一步探析法律信任合理性的基礎(chǔ)。其二,通過對(duì)法律信任內(nèi)在構(gòu)成的考察,得出了法律信任的三個(gè)合理性基礎(chǔ),即法律的價(jià)值合理性、法律的形式合理性和法律的強(qiáng)制力屬性。 第二部分論述了法律正義與法律信任的密切關(guān)聯(lián)。法律的生命力來(lái)源于它的正義屬性,并且,只有當(dāng)法律正義與社會(huì)正義相結(jié)合時(shí),人們才會(huì)在心理上認(rèn)同法律,從而接受法律。同時(shí),我們也必須注意到,法律正義與社會(huì)正義的結(jié)合是有限的,因此必須以一種理性的態(tài)度來(lái)看待法律正義。 第三部分圍繞形式理性法的合法性向度來(lái)論證法律信任的可能性。通過對(duì)韋伯法律形式合理性理論的考證,筆者進(jìn)而得出傳統(tǒng)法律形式合理性理論的局限性。而要克服這一合法性危機(jī),只有借鑒程序主義法律范式的思想,通過建立法律共識(shí)來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)法律事實(shí)性與有效性的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一。惟其如此,人們忠誠(chéng)于法律的信念才是穩(wěn)固的。 第四部分研究了法律運(yùn)行中的另一重要層面,即公民不服從問題。之所以要對(duì)之專章單獨(dú)論述,是因?yàn)槠溆袆e于人們通常所理解的以法律強(qiáng)制力屬性來(lái)催生法律信任的機(jī)理。公民不服從是以對(duì)法律的不服從為中心,然而它又是有限的不服從,其實(shí)質(zhì)是基于法律正義的不服從。通過對(duì)公民不服從的正當(dāng)性分析,我們可以認(rèn)為公民不服從是培養(yǎng)法律信任的一種內(nèi)生型的力量,它不但有利于法律的不斷進(jìn)步,而且能增進(jìn)人們對(duì)法律的感情。
[Abstract]:How is legal trust possible?To a great extent, it needs to be determined by the value rationality of the law, the formal rationality of the law and the implementation of the law in practice.This is the main line of this article to discuss the rationality of legal trust.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part is a summary of the composition and rationality of legal trust, and the latter three parts explain the reasonable elements of legal trust from three angles.The first part is mainly to solve two problems.First, how to analyze the inner constitution of legal trust?This is the basis of the further analysis of the rationality of legal trust.Secondly, through the investigation of the inner constitution of legal trust, three rational bases of legal trust are obtained, that is, the rationality of legal value, the rationality of form of law and the attribute of compulsory force of law.The second part discusses the close relationship between legal justice and legal trust.The vitality of law comes from its nature of justice, and only when legal justice and social justice are combined, can people accept the law psychologically.At the same time, we must also notice that the combination of legal justice and social justice is limited, so we must treat legal justice with a rational attitude.The third part demonstrates the possibility of legal trust around the legitimacy of formal rational law.Based on the textual research of Weber's theory of legal form rationality, the author draws the limitation of traditional theory of legal form rationality.In order to overcome this legitimacy crisis, we can only use the thought of procedural legal paradigm for reference and realize the organic unity of legal fact and validity through establishing legal consensus.Only in this way, people's faith in the law is solid.The fourth part studies another important aspect in the operation of law, that is, citizen's disobedience.The reason why it should be discussed separately is that it is different from the common understanding of the mechanism of giving birth to legal trust by the attribute of legal compulsion.Civil disobedience is centered on the disobedience to the law, but it is limited, and its essence is based on the legal justice.Through the analysis of the legitimacy of citizen disobedience, we can think that citizen disobedience is an endogenous force to cultivate legal trust, which is not only conducive to the continuous progress of law, but also can enhance people's feelings towards law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬新福;楊清望;;法律信任初論[J];河北法學(xué);2006年08期

2 胡啟忠;;法律正義與法律價(jià)值之關(guān)系辨正[J];河北法學(xué);2010年03期

3 唐濤;哈貝馬斯對(duì)韋伯形式主義法律觀的批判與超越[J];江蘇科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

4 任滿軍;;法律正義的理性視角[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2006年01期

5 馬長(zhǎng)山;哈貝馬斯的交往理性法律觀及其啟示[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年04期

6 劉雪梅;;公民的道德權(quán)利是否可能?——當(dāng)代政治哲學(xué)有關(guān)公民不服從基本問題之爭(zhēng)論[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年05期

7 呂建高;;論公民不服從的形式特征[J];理論界;2009年03期

8 岳th,田海平;信任研究的學(xué)術(shù)理路——對(duì)信任研究的若干路徑的考查[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年06期

9 呂建高;;論公民不服從的正當(dāng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年09期

10 周旺生;論作為高層次倫理規(guī)范的正義[J];法學(xué)論壇;2003年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1724681