本文選題：地方法治　切入點(diǎn)：治權(quán)自主　出處：《法學(xué)家》2017年04期

【摘要】："法治江蘇""法治浙江""法治廣東"等地方法治實(shí)踐的興起,引發(fā)了學(xué)者們對(duì)地方法治概念的理論爭議。質(zhì)疑者認(rèn)為主權(quán)是現(xiàn)代法治概念的基礎(chǔ),地方不是獨(dú)立的法治單元體,故而地方法治概念不能成立。肯定者從地方法治發(fā)展的主客觀動(dòng)力因素出發(fā),分別提出先行法治論、地域文化論、地方競爭論和國家試錯(cuò)論等四種代表性學(xué)說,但均未闡明受質(zhì)疑的地方法治的權(quán)力基礎(chǔ),故而難以有效證成地方法治概念。主權(quán)與治權(quán)相分離是地方法治概念的法理基礎(chǔ),憲法、法律中有關(guān)地方治權(quán)形態(tài)與治權(quán)事項(xiàng)的規(guī)定是地方法治概念的制度依據(jù),中央主導(dǎo)下的地方治權(quán)自主是地方法治概念的社會(huì)實(shí)效性根據(jù)。治權(quán)自主理論的提出,有助于明確地方法治概念的主體層級(jí)、評(píng)判地方法治實(shí)踐以及合理界定地方法治與國家法治的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The rise of local legal practice, such as "ruling by law Jiangsu", "ruling by law Zhejiang", "ruling by law Guangdong" and so on, has triggered a theoretical dispute among scholars on the concept of local rule of law. The skeptics believe that sovereignty is the basis of the concept of modern rule of law, and that the place is not an independent unit of the rule of law. Therefore, the concept of local rule of law cannot be established. From the subjective and objective motive factors of the development of local rule of law, the affirmative put forward four representative theories, namely, the leading rule of law theory, the regional culture theory, the local competition theory and the state trial and error theory, respectively. However, neither of them clarifies the power basis of the local rule of law, which is difficult to prove effectively. The separation of sovereignty and power is the legal basis of the concept of local rule of law. The regulation of the form and matters of local governance of power in law is the institutional basis of the concept of local rule of law, and the autonomy of local power under the guidance of the central government is the basis of social effectiveness of the concept of local rule of law, and the theory of autonomy of governance of power is put forward. It is helpful to clarify the main level of the concept of local rule of law, to judge the practice of local rule of law and to define the relationship between local rule of law and national rule of law.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;南京師范大學(xué)中國法治現(xiàn)代化研究院;
【基金】：國家社科基金一般項(xiàng)目“地方法治化差異格局與法治中國實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑研究”(14BFX005) “江蘇高校優(yōu)勢(shì)學(xué)科建設(shè)工程資助項(xiàng)目”(PAPD)資助
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 游勸榮;關(guān)于法治概念的界定[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

2 張千帆;;法治概念的不足[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2006年06期

3 李長健;論法治概念與法治判斷的要素[J];黑龍江社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年04期

4 潘佳銘;法治概念的性質(zhì)探析[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

5 石茂生;;論法治概念的實(shí)質(zhì)要素——評(píng)亞里士多德的法治思想[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

6 王振彥;對(duì)“社會(huì)主義法治”概念的理解和思考[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年03期

7 黃濤;;重新思考法治概念[J];讀書;2013年12期

8 陳弘毅;;淺談法治的概念[J];民主與科學(xué);2007年03期

9 呂鶴云;秦潤華;;法治概念探究[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年04期

10 李超;;論清末的法治概念[J];樂山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1672291