本文選題：文物借展扣押豁免　切入點(diǎn)：外國(guó)主權(quán)豁免法案　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在這個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的時(shí)代,人們的物質(zhì)生活得到了極大的豐富和滿(mǎn)足,從而對(duì)精神文化的需求也日漸增多。國(guó)家間的文物交流活動(dòng)成為了人們滿(mǎn)足精神文化需求的重要手段之一。因此,文物借展扣押豁免立法活動(dòng)應(yīng)運(yùn)而生,逐漸走入國(guó)際法學(xué)者的視野之中。本文將以美國(guó)的外國(guó)主權(quán)豁免法案(FSIA)、扣押豁免法案(I.F.S.A.)以及外國(guó)文化交流豁免管轄條例(FCEJICA)三大文物借展司法免扣押法案為切入點(diǎn),具體分析文物借展扣押豁免的條件、形式等等法律要素。并且從中提煉出立法可行性建議,供中國(guó)推進(jìn)相關(guān)立法參考。剖析文物借展扣押豁免立法首先要明確的是文物借展的內(nèi)涵。本文將從文物和文物借展的法律內(nèi)涵入手,清晰界定二者的主體范圍。其次本文將從借展主體和行為性質(zhì)兩個(gè)方面探討文物借展扣押豁免與國(guó)家豁免的本質(zhì)性區(qū)別。這一結(jié)論也是為推進(jìn)我國(guó)相關(guān)立法提供參考性意見(jiàn)的重要環(huán)節(jié)。此外,美國(guó)三個(gè)具有代表性的法律文件在客觀(guān)上是針對(duì)文物借展扣押豁免這一問(wèn)題循序漸進(jìn)的立法實(shí)踐。本文針對(duì)三項(xiàng)文件的立法背景、立法程序以及法案內(nèi)容做出了細(xì)致嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)难芯�。本文得�?文物借展扣押豁免立法須得對(duì)文物的公益性、合法性、文物借展主體的國(guó)家性,文物借展活動(dòng)的無(wú)償性進(jìn)行嚴(yán)格規(guī)定,并且嚴(yán)格規(guī)范文物借展的信息審查環(huán)節(jié)。在對(duì)于我國(guó)立法現(xiàn)狀和文物借展活動(dòng)的現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查中,不光要明確對(duì)外借展的活動(dòng)情況,也要明確兩岸文物借展活動(dòng)現(xiàn)狀,從歷史演變的視角,得出我國(guó)借展活動(dòng)趨于頻繁以及借展活動(dòng)存在障礙的法律原因。在明確了法律要素之后,再根據(jù)從美國(guó)立法文件中提煉出的立法框架,比照我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況,為我國(guó)推進(jìn)相關(guān)立法提供實(shí)質(zhì)性建議。
[Abstract]:In this era of economic integration, people's material lives have been greatly enriched and satisfied. As a result, the demand for spiritual culture is increasing day by day. The exchange of cultural relics between countries has become one of the important means for people to meet the needs of spiritual culture. Gradually entering the field of view of the scholars of international law. This article will take the three major cultural relics of the United States, I. F.S.A., I. F.S.A., and FCEJICA, as a starting point for judicial exemption from seizure through the exhibition of foreign cultural exchanges. Concretely analyzing the conditions, forms, and other legal elements of the exemption from seizure of cultural relics through exhibition, and abstracting legislative feasibility suggestions from them. For China to promote the relevant legislation for reference. Analysis of cultural relics through the exhibition of seizure exemption legislation must be clear first of all is the connotation of cultural relics loan exhibition. This article will start with the legal connotation of cultural relics and cultural relics borrowing exhibition. Secondly, this paper will discuss the essential difference between the immunity of seizure of cultural relics and the immunity of the state from two aspects: the subject of borrowing exhibition and the nature of behavior. This conclusion is also provided for the promotion of the relevant legislation of our country. An important link in a reference opinion. In addition, The three representative legal documents of the United States objectively aim at the gradual legislative practice of exemption from seizure of cultural relics. This paper aims at the legislative background of the three documents. The legislative procedure and the content of the bill have made a careful and rigorous study. This paper draws the conclusion that the legislation on exemption from seizure of cultural relics through exhibition must have public welfare, legality, and the national character of the subject of cultural relics borrowing exhibition. The free nature of cultural relics borrowing and exhibition activities is strictly regulated, and the information examination links of cultural relics borrowing exhibitions are strictly standardized. In the investigation of the current situation of legislation and cultural relics borrowing activities in China, we should not only make clear the activities of borrowing and exhibition activities, It is also necessary to clarify the current situation of cultural relics borrowing and exhibition activities on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and from the perspective of historical evolution, to find out the legal reasons for the frequent lending activities and the obstacles to borrowing and exhibition activities in China. After defining the legal elements, According to the legislative framework extracted from the United States legislative documents, and in accordance with the actual situation of our country, it provides substantive suggestions for our country to advance the relevant legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D971.2;DD912.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 欒文靜;;兩岸文物展覽交流司法扣押豁免問(wèn)題研究[J];故宮博物院院刊;2015年04期

2 高升;李廠(chǎng);;英國(guó)文物借展扣押豁免立法評(píng)析[J];山東科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年04期

3 何志鵬;;主權(quán)豁免的中國(guó)立場(chǎng)[J];政法論壇;2015年03期

4 盧熙;;兩岸文物借展及其司法免扣押?jiǎn)栴}探析[J];臺(tái)灣研究;2010年05期

5 唐海清;;論1954年《海牙公約》對(duì)于文化遺產(chǎn)的國(guó)際保護(hù)[J];湖南行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

6 肖永平;張帆;;美國(guó)國(guó)家豁免法的新發(fā)展及其對(duì)中國(guó)的影響[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

7 王立君;;國(guó)家及其財(cái)產(chǎn)管轄豁免規(guī)則的新發(fā)展——兼論我國(guó)的立法與實(shí)踐[J];法商研究;2007年03期

8 曾令良;;現(xiàn)代國(guó)際法的人本化發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年01期

9 趙建文;;國(guó)家豁免的本質(zhì)、適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];法學(xué)家;2005年06期

10 馬新民;;《聯(lián)合國(guó)國(guó)家及其財(cái)產(chǎn)管轄豁免公約》評(píng)介[J];法學(xué)家;2005年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張露藜;國(guó)家豁免專(zhuān)論[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 彭丹丹;國(guó)家豁免范圍問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1670319