本文選題：中國企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法　切入點：韓國破產(chǎn)法　出處：《南京大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在2006年,《中華人民共和國企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》與通過數(shù)次的修訂過程而制定的韓國《統(tǒng)合破產(chǎn)法》都相繼被制定和實施。按照兩國的經(jīng)濟情況和世界潮流被修訂的兩國破產(chǎn)法,對兩國而言,是意義重大的一種變化。本文整體上分析了中國《企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》和韓國《統(tǒng)合破產(chǎn)法》的特征,以兩國的法律條文為主進行制度比較。 正文共分為七個部分。 第一章討論了破產(chǎn)法的目的和在當代社會中破產(chǎn)制度的意義及其必要性。破產(chǎn)有兩種破產(chǎn)形式,一是清算型破產(chǎn),另一是回生型破產(chǎn)。大部分人一聽‘破產(chǎn)’這詞,一般想起來的是傳統(tǒng)的清算型破產(chǎn),就認為破產(chǎn)是一個清算整理公司的程序之一。因此,本文說明給債務(wù)人、債權(quán)人都有幫助的回生型破產(chǎn)‘重整制度’的意義和破產(chǎn)制度的根本目的。 第二章討論中韓兩國的破產(chǎn)制度體系的根源。中國的‘社會主義市場經(jīng)濟’體制和韓國面臨過的‘世界金融危機’等特殊情況影響了兩國的破產(chǎn)制度的修訂。通過中韓兩國的破產(chǎn)制度沿革,比較兩國的經(jīng)濟情況和立法思想,進行分析法律構(gòu)成、適用范圍等兩國破產(chǎn)法制度的體系和其主要特征。 第三章主要討論的是破產(chǎn)制度的核心組織--“破產(chǎn)管理機構(gòu)”。本文通過比較研究,指出兩國均采用破產(chǎn)管理機構(gòu)的代表性機構(gòu)‘管理人制度’和代表債權(quán)人利益的‘債權(quán)人會議制度’。而且,按照兩國的國情,還運營‘債權(quán)人委員會(中國)’、‘管理委員會和調(diào)查委員(韓國)’。本章還討論了這些破產(chǎn)管理機構(gòu)的角色和其必要性。 第四章討論了回生型破產(chǎn)的代表制度‘重整程序制度’。首先說明了重整程序制度的意義和其必要性和兩國重整程序制度的進行過程。而且,通過兩國有關(guān)法律條文,進行分析了兩國的重整制度上的特征。 第五章比較說明了破產(chǎn)程序中和解程序制度。本文指出,中國《企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》的特征之一是重整程序、和解程序、破產(chǎn)清算程序都被連接,進行破產(chǎn)程序。但為了防止因和解制度的惡用而引起的負面影響,制定韓國《統(tǒng)合破產(chǎn)法》時,廢止了曾有的和解法。本章說明了其廢止原因,分析了中國和解制度的特征。 第六章討論了傳統(tǒng)的破產(chǎn)形式‘破產(chǎn)清算程序制度’。通過有關(guān)法律條文,進行比較中韓兩國破產(chǎn)清算程序的過程和其主要特征,同時討論了破產(chǎn)清算程序的終點站‘破產(chǎn)程序的終結(jié)’。 結(jié)語部分對中韓兩國破產(chǎn)制度進行了整體性比較,并提出了兩國需要改善的部分。
[Abstract]:In 2006, both the Enterprise bankruptcy Law of the people's Republic of China and the Korean Unified bankruptcy Law, formulated through several revisions, were formulated and implemented. It is a significant change for the two countries. This paper analyzes the characteristics of China's Enterprise bankruptcy Law and Korea's Unified bankruptcy Law, and compares the two countries' legal provisions. The text is divided into seven parts. The first chapter discusses the purpose of insolvency law and the significance and necessity of bankruptcy system in contemporary society. There are two forms of bankruptcy: liquidation bankruptcy and reincarnation bankruptcy. Most people hear the word 'bankruptcy'. Generally speaking, we think of bankruptcy as one of the procedures of a liquidation company. Creditors are helpful to the meaning of the reincarnation bankruptcy 'reorganization system' and the fundamental purpose of the bankruptcy system. The second chapter discusses the root of the bankruptcy system of China and South Korea. The 'socialist market economy' system in China and the 'world financial crisis' faced by South Korea have affected the revision of the bankruptcy system of the two countries. Through the evolution of the bankruptcy system of China and South Korea, This paper compares the economic situation and legislative thought of the two countries and analyzes the legal constitution and the scope of application of the bankruptcy law system of the two countries and its main characteristics. The third chapter mainly discusses the core organization of the bankruptcy system-"the bankruptcy Administration". Noting that both countries use the 'administrator' system, the representative body of the insolvency administration, and the 'creditors' meeting system, which represents the interests of creditors, and that, in the light of the national conditions of the two countries, It also operates the 'creditor committee' management committee and investigating committee (Korea). This chapter also discusses the role of these insolvency authorities and their necessity. The fourth chapter discusses the representative system of reincarnation bankruptcy 'reorganization procedure system. Firstly, it explains the significance and necessity of the reorganization procedure system and the process of carrying out the reorganization procedure system of the two countries. Moreover, through the relevant legal provisions of the two countries, The characteristics of the reorganization system of the two countries are analyzed. Chapter five compares and explains the settlement procedure system in bankruptcy proceedings. This paper points out that one of the characteristics of China's Enterprise bankruptcy Law is that the reorganization procedure, the settlement procedure, and the bankruptcy liquidation procedure are all connected. But in order to prevent the negative influence caused by the evil use of the settlement system, the former conciliatory law was abolished when the Korean uniform bankruptcy Law was formulated. This chapter explains the reasons for its abolishment and analyzes the characteristics of the Chinese settlement system. The sixth chapter discusses the traditional bankruptcy form, the bankruptcy liquidation procedure system. Through the relevant legal provisions, it compares the process and the main characteristics of the bankruptcy liquidation procedure between China and South Korea. At the same time, the termination of bankruptcy proceedings is discussed. The conclusion part compares the bankruptcy system of China and South Korea, and points out the parts that need to be improved.
【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.92;D931.26

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鄒海林;;我國企業(yè)再生程序的制度分析和適用[J];政法論壇;2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 金星均;韓國公司重整制度立法的研究[D];中國政法大學;2006年

2 楊學波;我國銀行業(yè)破產(chǎn)法律制度分析與構(gòu)建[D];中國政法大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1646686