本文選題：權(quán)利本位論　切入點：法本位　出處：《廣西大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在改革開放的時代背景下,為了糾正長期以來“以階級斗爭為綱”的法學(xué)路線,上世紀(jì)八十年代末、九十年代初法學(xué)理論界圍繞著“法本位”問題展開激烈的爭論。其中權(quán)利本位論論者主張以“權(quán)利”作為法的本位贏得了眾多的支持者,他們認(rèn)為法以(應(yīng)當(dāng)以)“權(quán)利”為其起點,軸心或重心,權(quán)利本位范式為法學(xué)提供了理解系統(tǒng)、重構(gòu)工具、理論框架,應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)權(quán)利本位論重構(gòu)中國法學(xué)。學(xué)術(shù)界眾多法學(xué)家紛紛對此進(jìn)行了質(zhì)疑和批判,并形成了一系列有價值的學(xué)術(shù)理論�？v觀國際法學(xué)理論研究,西方法學(xué)界同樣針對西方當(dāng)下的“權(quán)利話語”進(jìn)行了質(zhì)疑和批判。故此,為了梳理權(quán)利本位論的邏輯脈絡(luò),筆者通過研究權(quán)利本位論提出的背景、權(quán)利本位論的主要觀點、以及當(dāng)代中西法學(xué)理論界對權(quán)利本位論的質(zhì)疑與批判,進(jìn)而對權(quán)利本位論進(jìn)行了再次探討,并嘗試提出一條探視性的路徑。
[Abstract]:In the background of the reform and opening up, in order to correct the "class struggle" line of law for a long time, at the end of -20s, In 90s, the academic circle of law launched a fierce debate around the issue of "law standard", in which the right-based theorists advocated "right" as the standard of law, which won many supporters. They think that law should take "right" as its starting point, axis or center of gravity, and the right-based paradigm provides a system of understanding, a tool for reconstruction, a theoretical framework for law. Chinese jurisprudence should be reconstructed according to the theory of right standard. Many jurists in academic circles have questioned and criticized it one after another, and formed a series of valuable academic theories. Therefore, in order to sort out the logic of the right standard theory, the author studies the background of the right standard theory and the main viewpoints of the right standard theory by studying the background of the right standard theory and the main point of view of the right standard theory. In addition, the contemporary Chinese and Western legal theorists question and criticize the theory of right standard, and then probe into the theory of right standard again, and try to put forward a visitation path.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 侯猛;中國的后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)研究及其前景[J];法商研究-中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(法學(xué)版);2001年02期

2 張文顯;;從義務(wù)本位到權(quán)利本位是法的發(fā)展規(guī)律[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;1990年03期

3 葛洪義;法律·權(quán)利·權(quán)利本位——新時期法學(xué)視角的轉(zhuǎn)換及其意義[J];社會科學(xué);1991年03期

4 張文顯;;“權(quán)利本位”之語義和意義分析——兼論社會主義法是新型的權(quán)利本位法[J];中國法學(xué);1990年04期

5 劉旺洪;權(quán)利本位的理論邏輯——與童之偉教授商榷[J];中國法學(xué);2001年02期

6 李步云,劉士平;論行政權(quán)力與公民權(quán)利關(guān)系[J];中國法學(xué);2004年01期

7 高中;后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)與批判法學(xué)關(guān)于"權(quán)利話語"論爭的啟示[J];法治論叢;2005年01期

8 鄧正來;中國法學(xué)向何處去(上)——建構(gòu)“中國法律理想圖景”時代的論綱[J];政法論壇;2005年01期

，

本文編號：1644458