本文選題：司法大眾化　切入點：司法職業(yè)化　出處：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：研究司法大眾化可以從職業(yè)維度與政治維度兩種視角進行,職業(yè)維度說得是司法從業(yè)者來自于普通民眾,而政治維度說得是掌握中央權(quán)力的社會階層,通過讓民眾參與其司法過程,將它希望的社會秩序落實于其它社會階層的過程。職業(yè)維度是司法大眾化的表象,政治維度才是司法大眾化的本質(zhì)。并且,司法大眾化具有“參與”和“救濟”兩個層面的內(nèi)含。我國和英國都廣泛存在司法大眾化現(xiàn)象,其中典型的有陪審制度與“三刺之法”,治安法官制度與鄉(xiāng)—里“司法”。司法大眾化在兩國的表現(xiàn)不同,效果不同,這種不同可以從三個方面進行解釋。一是司法大眾化的主觀訴求,二是司法大眾化的客觀必要性,三是司法大眾化的可行性。近現(xiàn)代,兩國歷史上的司法大眾化的典型制度都受到不同程度地影響,英國較好地處理了司法大眾化與司法職業(yè)化的關(guān)系,淡化司法大眾化中的參與成分,轉(zhuǎn)而強調(diào)司法大眾化的救濟成分。我國也進行過幾次司法大眾化與司法職業(yè)化的取舍實踐,屢屢遇到困難。只要政治訴求尚存,司法大眾化就有其存在的意義。司法大眾化與司法職業(yè)化不存在必然的沖突,單一的大眾化與職業(yè)化在我國都行不通。我國應(yīng)當(dāng)在實踐司法大眾化的同時,堅持走司法職業(yè)化道路,應(yīng)當(dāng)更多地強調(diào)司法大眾化中的實質(zhì)性救濟。
[Abstract]:The study of judicial popularization can be carried out from two perspectives: the professional dimension and the political dimension. The professional dimension is that the judicial practitioners come from the ordinary people, and the political dimension is the social stratum that holds the central power. By involving the public in its judicial process, the social order it hopes for is implemented in the process of other social strata. The professional dimension is the representation of judicial popularization, and the political dimension is the essence of judicial popularization. Judicial popularization has two aspects: "participation" and "relief". The phenomenon of judicial popularization exists widely in China and Britain. Typical of them are the jury system and the "law of three thorns", the system of magistrates and the "justice of justice" in the township. The judicial popularization is different in the two countries and the effect is different. This difference can be explained from three aspects. One is the subjective appeal of judicial popularization, the other is the objective necessity of judicial popularization, and the third is the feasibility of judicial popularization. The typical system of judicial popularization in the history of the two countries has been affected to varying degrees. Britain has handled the relationship between judicial popularization and judicial professionalization and played down the participation in judicial popularization. Instead of emphasizing the relief elements of judicial popularization, our country has also carried out several times of judicial popularization and judicial professionalization practice, often encountered difficulties, as long as the political appeal remains, Judicial popularization has its own significance. There is no inevitable conflict between judicial popularization and judicial professionalization. Sticking to the road of judicial professionalization should emphasize more substantial relief in judicial popularization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926;D956.1

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 郭愛民;;中世紀(jì)英國多元權(quán)力社會結(jié)構(gòu)與間接民主起源[J];北方論叢;2007年04期

2 屈文生;;試論普通法令狀的起源及其嬗變[J];東方法學(xué);2009年05期

3 顧榮新;;12世紀(jì)～19世紀(jì)英國治安法官的起源與流變[J];法律文化研究;2007年00期

4 沈德詠;;司法大眾化的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];法制資訊;2009年01期

5 程漢大;12—13世紀(jì)英國法律制度的革命性變化[J];世界歷史;2000年05期

6 陳日華;;中古英格蘭的教區(qū)行政[J];世界歷史;2007年01期

7 何兵;司法職業(yè)化與民主化[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年04期

8 侯欣一;;陜甘寧邊區(qū)司法制度的大眾化特點[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年04期

9 王敏遠;中國陪審制度及其完善[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年04期

10 程遠宏;;論明清鄉(xiāng)族勢力對經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的阻礙作用[J];荊州師專學(xué)報;1991年04期

中國博士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 曹永軍;陪審制度變革的歷史成因[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 陸娓;明清鄉(xiāng)里調(diào)解制度研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1643098